Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/259527-do-i-say-not-i-do-profiles-liberal-hypocrisy.html)

Hugh R 01-06-2006 08:04 AM

Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy
 
Have you heard about this book?

The author gives a dozen examples of liberals who act different in their private lives than what they expouse in their public statements.

Examples.

Teddy Kennedy who advocates a 49% estate (death) tax has moved several hundred million of his families wealth to tax havens in Fiji. Kennedy also pays less taxes than a 17 year old working on minimum wage.

Barbara Streisand who says were ruining the earth pays $20,000 water bills for irrigation of her estate in Malibu, and sh relocated a stream several hundred feet so that she could have a bigger contiguous front yard.

Michael Moore holds stock in Boeing, Halliburton and other companys he bad mouths.

Hillary says 13 and 14 year old girls are mature enough to decide on getting abortions without parental approval, yet she stopped Chelsea from getting her ears pierced at 15. I guess she knows whats best for her child and your child.

aways 01-06-2006 09:52 AM

Not surprising... Liberals usually get a free pass on hypocrisy because they control most of the forums for public discourse (Hollywood, Universities, most TV and news papers). Thankfully, the left hasn't found a way to neutralize talk radio or ban conservative books, but that doesn't mean they aren't trying. BTW, another example of liberal hypocrisy is Robert Redford's use of an "evil" SUV to explore off-road in the mountains... A conservative would be portrayed as "tearing up the environment".

cool_chick 01-06-2006 11:21 AM

This is not an "idealogic-specific" thing.....



Take for example Minister Lonnie Latham of the South Tulsa Baptist Church in Oklahoma. The reverend apparently thought he was "pastoring" to police when he was arrested for propositioning a male Oklahoma City Police officer.

The ministry claim is puzzling when you consider that "Latham, who has spoken out against homosexuality, asked the officer to join him in his hotel room for oral sex." In fact, "He has also spoken out against same-sex marriage and in support of a Southern Baptist Convention directive urging its 42,000 churches to befriend gays and lesbians and try to convince them that they can become heterosexual 'if they accept Jesus Christ as their savior and reject their 'sinful, destructive lifestyle."'

Well, mistakes do happen, but not many police officers get fellatio confused with preaching on behalf of Jesus.

Latham has a family, and the South Tulsa Baptist Church was quick to put a note up on its website expressing their support for the minister and his loved ones.

But BuzzFlash can only say that we've never read any religious tract that says you can find Christ through a blowjob. So, for that bizarre religious claim, we feel compelled to bestow the honor of the BuzzFlash GOP Hypocrite of the Week on Rev. Latham, in the category of perverse religiosity.

Remember our motto at BuzzFlash.com: So many Republican hypocrites, so little time.

Catch up with you soon
http://www.gophypocrites.com/2006/01/hyp06001.html

Teutonics 01-06-2006 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
Take for example Minister Lonnie Latham...
Who? Never heard of him before.

I've heard the others names once or twice before.

stevepaa 01-06-2006 11:29 AM

So Hugh, got any documentation for those facts?

stevepaa 01-06-2006 11:30 AM

The best was that southern ca republican ousted recently.

Jeff Higgins 01-06-2006 11:34 AM

Let's see... he is a Christian, a Southern Bapist at that. Must be a Republican. He has spoken out against homosexuality. Must be a Republican.

Those stereotypes say an awful lot about the people that perpetuate them. Nowhere do I see any reference to his political party affiliation. The clear inference from those within the Demcratic Party that support these stereotypes is that they feel there is no room in their party for anyone that holds those values. "We certainly don't hold them, so anybody that does must not be one of us" seems to be the attitude they present. Incredible for a "liberal" party that prides itself on inclusiveness.

legion 01-06-2006 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by stevepaa
The best was that southern ca republican ousted recently.
I call B.S.

There is no such thing.

"southern ca republican" really means "not liberal enough".

cool_chick 01-06-2006 11:38 AM

Yes, you hit the nail on the head Jeff. Stereotypes, just like this original post support these stereotypes that millions of people are a "certain way" because of the actions of a couple.

Good job Jeff. You win the award for getting it!

And what "liberal" party were you talking about? If you're talking about me, I didn't realize Libertarian is a "liberal" party.....

stevepaa 01-06-2006 11:46 AM

Or Reagan saying the US will not deal with terrorists.

oldsam 01-06-2006 12:08 PM

Or GW making campaign promises that he wouldn't do any nation building.:rolleyes:

Jeff Higgins 01-06-2006 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
Yes, you hit the nail on the head Jeff. Stereotypes, just like this original post support these stereotypes that millions of people are a "certain way" because of the actions of a couple.

Good job Jeff. You win the award for getting it!

And what "liberal" party were you talking about? If you're talking about me, I didn't realize Libertarian is a "liberal" party.....

Caught violating one of my own rules - I assumed "Buzzflash", with its Republican-bashing page, was a liberal Democratic leaning website. Are you saying it's not, or are you saying you are not (a liberal Democrat)? Are you really a Libertarian? Does "Buzzflash" have a Democrat-bashing page as well?

Rodeo 01-06-2006 12:55 PM

I call bull on all of them. In fact, it's pretty interesting that anyone would swallow these "facts,” indeed embrace them, not knowing anything about the source or the backup.

"Kennedy also pays less taxes than a 17 year old working on minimum wage."

Get real.

I've got one for you: "I'll be a uniter, not a divider."

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by oldsam
Or GW making campaign promises that he wouldn't do any nation building.:rolleyes:
Or Bill Clinton saying he had no knowledge that Charlie Trie and Johnny Chung's fundraising was coming from the ChiCom military...mere coincidence that Clinton loosened trade restrictions allowing his buddies to sell ICBM technology to the ChiComs.

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rodeo
I've got one for you: "I'll be a uniter, not a divider."
You haven't bought that big lie too, have you?...Really is hard to unite when you are constantly pulling knives from your back...The left calls him a "divider" as cover, true to scumbag form they accuse Bush of doing precisely their central strategery.

Ya'll should change your political symbol from the jackass to the jackal.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff Higgins
Caught violating one of my own rules - I assumed "Buzzflash", with its Republican-bashing page, was a liberal Democratic leaning website. Are you saying it's not, or are you saying you are not (a liberal Democrat)? Are you really a Libertarian? Does "Buzzflash" have a Democrat-bashing page as well?
Hell if I know. I found that on another forum and thought it was so appropriate in light of this silly thread.

FrayAdjacent911 01-06-2006 01:39 PM

I think anyone of any ideology can be hypocritical... heck, I bet EVERYONE to some degree or another, is hypocritical.

However, with the not so long ago presidential elections... I can't recall how many times I saw or read about protesters protesting our President, and so called 'peace protesters' turn violent and riot. Heck down here in the small city of Austin, peace protesters had to be broken up and about a score arrested because they would NOT behave. I know several local cops, one of which was there. The protesters were told they could protest, as long as they did not obstruct traffic.... so what did they do? They tried to block off the Congress street bridge.

I've seen video of conservative counterprotesters being assaulted, verbally and physically, by protesters outside of the RNC in '04.

Sorry, but it does seem to be that many leftists are 'tolerant'... but only if you are of the same opinion.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 01:53 PM

I tend to have an intolerence for intolerant people. Think every single person, "leftie", "rightie", purple, green, blah blah blah blah more useless "leftie/rightie" blah blah is not "tolerant" from time to time.

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
I tend to have an intolerence for intolerant people. Think every single person, "leftie", "rightie", purple, green, blah blah blah blah more useless "leftie/rightie" blah blah is not "tolerant" from time to time.
Try being a black person and a Republican simultaneously...Talk about discrimination...The Democrats will call you an Uncle Tom, house ni$$er, or worse.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Try being a black person and a Republican simultaneously...Talk about discrimination...The Democrats will call you an Uncle Tom, house ni$$er, or worse.
You're a joke.

I know one person did, which, of course, is not representative of anything, let alone Democrats.

It's like saying "talk about loonies, those republicans, Robertson said that Sharon's stroke was divine retribution."

:rolleyes:

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
You're a joke.

I know one person did, which, of course, is not representative of anything, let alone Democrats.

It's like saying "talk about loonies, those republicans, Robertson said that Sharon's stroke was divine retribution."

:rolleyes:

Apples and oranges...Pat Robertson is the exception...Black and Democrat prejudice against black Republicans is the rule...From the "Black caucus" to the "NAACP" there is no allowance for stepping off the liberal plantation.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Apples and oranges...Pat Robertson is the exception...Black and Democrat prejudice against black Republicans is the rule...From the "Black caucus" to the "NAACP" there is no allowance for stepping off the liberal plantation.

Apples and oranges my ass.

Now the NAACP, etc. is "against" black Republicans?

:rolleyes:


whaaaaaaaaaa. The classic "victim" bull***** again. haha


Look at it this way, if everyone thought a republican was like you, they'd have a very distorted view of what republicans are and they too would think all republicans are whacked out crazies. Now how realistic is that?

It's not intelligent or realistic to attribute the actions of a few to millions. In fact, it's pretty damn stupid of that person who does that....

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
Now the NAACP, etc. is "against" black Republicans?

whaaaaaaaaaa. The classic "victim" bull***** again. haha
The NAACP and the Black Caucus are LIBERAL organizations who seek to lynch blacks who dare stray from the socialist plantation.

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 02:34 PM

What I find interesting is how quick the left goes from throwing spears at Sharon to swinging his near dead body at Pat Robertson...What a bunch of scumbags.

I will never forget the Democrats turning Paul Wellstone's memorial into a political rally and three-hour Republican hate-a-thon.

Nathans_Dad 01-06-2006 02:40 PM

Do I REALLY need to bring up the treatment of Michael Steele, Black Republican running for Governor of Maryland?? The following is an excerpt from a Washington Times piece on the situation:

"State Sen. Verna Jones, Baltimore Democrat and vice chairman of the General Assembly's black caucus, said black Republicans deserve criticism because the GOP has not promoted the interests of the black community.
Even the spokesman for Mr. Mfume's campaign said pelting Mr. Steele with Oreo cookies and calling him an "Uncle Tom" are simply "pointing out the obvious."

"There is a difference between pointing out the obvious and calling someone names," Mfume spokesman Joseph R. Trippi said Tuesday. "

http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20051103-120701-5604r_page2.htm

Yes, that is the spokesman for Kweisi Mfume, poster child of the Democratic party these days saying that.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 03:31 PM

Already been discussed Nathans_dad. How can you be so unrealistic to attribute one person's actions/feelings to millions of people?

tabs 01-06-2006 04:15 PM

America is doing the work of Satan.....

Nathans_Dad 01-06-2006 04:40 PM

One person?? Um, are you familiar with the story at all??

The man was pelted with Oreos by multiple black people at a debate. He was called an Uncle Tom by multiple black Democrats in Maryland. Mfume's spokesman said all this action was just "pointing out the obvious". Various black Democrats have refused to denounce the activity, trying to justify it because they say that party trumps race.

It isn't "just one person"...

But feel free to keep telling yourself that it doesn't happen.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nathans_Dad
One person?? Um, are you familiar with the story at all??

The man was pelted with Oreos by multiple black people at a debate. He was called an Uncle Tom by multiple black Democrats in Maryland. Mfume's spokesman said all this action was just "pointing out the obvious". Various black Democrats have refused to denounce the activity, trying to justify it because they say that party trumps race.

It isn't "just one person"...

But feel free to keep telling yourself that it doesn't happen.


When did I say it "doesn't happen?"

This is an isolated incident with a few people at best. But feel free to keep telling yourself this is how millions are.....

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
Now the NAACP, etc. is "against" black Republicans?

It's not intelligent or realistic to attribute the actions of a few to millions. In fact, it's pretty damn stupid of that person who does that....
Absofreakinlutely frightening...Chicky, you buttress my rationale for not having a girlfriend.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Absofreakinlutely frightening...Chicky, you buttress my rationale for not having a girlfriend.

Yep, you don't know what to do with an intelligent woman on your arm.....

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 04:48 PM

I rest my case.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
I rest my case.

Hey, I don't know why intelligent women threaten you so.....

Why don't you just seek some help with that or something....

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 04:55 PM

Go make me a sandwich.

cool_chick 01-06-2006 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
Go make me a sandwich.
Why on earth would I do that?

Nathans_Dad 01-06-2006 05:21 PM

And where did I say that I thought that is how "millions" are?

You are the one that bristled at the idea that black Republicans are denigrated by Black Democrats. Seems to me you have the position to defend, not me.

lendaddy 01-06-2006 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
Hey, I don't know why intelligent women threaten you so.....

Where? :)

cool_chick 01-06-2006 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lendaddy
Where? :)
On Mul's arm...and here.

Hugh R 01-06-2006 05:31 PM

Back on subject

Stevepaa, go to amazon.com type in the name of the book and read the reviews.

As far as kennedy paying less taxes than a 17 year old I should have said "on the hundreds of millions that he move to a tax shelter in Fiji" sorry.

And sure there are no doubt plenty of republicans who are corrupt, and/or don't practice what they preach, and they should be called on the carpet as well. Just cause the author jumps on Liberal-democarts, doesn't mean others don't exist.

The book discusses Nancy Pelosi and the fact that her family vineyards are non-union, and so are her restaurants, yet she preaches pro-union support publically and the United Farm Workers gave her an award last year for her pro-union stance...let me say again, her enterprises are non-union what's up with that?

Mulhollanddose 01-06-2006 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
On Mul's arm...and here.
Keep 10 feet behind in public and naked in private. :D


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.