Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Why do liberals fear gloabl warming more than conservatives? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/289562-why-do-liberals-fear-gloabl-warming-more-than-conservatives.html)

jorian 06-22-2006 07:29 AM

Moneyguy1- jorian says that GW was caused by hot air?

Nope. Was just commenting on 914GT's link to a paper disputing the cause of GW. Nothing in it (it was only a paragraph or two) convinces me that GW isn't the cause of CO2 emissons.

914GT 06-22-2006 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jorian
Moneyguy1- jorian says that GW was caused by hot air?

Nope. Was just commenting on 914GT's link to a paper disputing the cause of GW. Nothing in it (it was only a paragraph or two) convinces me that GW isn't the cause of CO2 emissons.

Then you are ignoring what several reputable climatologists have to say. To be 'convinced' indicates you've made up your mind and that you reject any research by other scientists working in that field. I would not be convinced of anything at this point in time. Being skeptical makes a good scientist.

jorian 06-22-2006 08:11 AM

Post said "nothing in it convinces me...." Not rejecting/indicating anything.

914GT 06-22-2006 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jorian
Post said "nothing in it convinces me...." Not rejecting/indicating anything.
I'm not referring specifically to that post or that paper by Hansen. I'm referring to all research by all climatologists, where there is disagreement that CO2 is factor in global warming. You seem to need 'convincing' that CO2 is not the cause of global warming.

Moneyguy1 06-22-2006 08:46 AM

I was jokingly referring to a totally different "GW"!!!!

<G>

Mulhollanddose 06-22-2006 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
I was jokingly referring to a totally different "GW"!!!!

<G>

As I was joking, suggesting that ya'll libeRATs can't find anything you won't blame on Bush or Republicans...The joke was the absurdity of the left.

You misunderestimate me woodennickle.

Racerbvd 06-22-2006 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 914GT
I'm not referring specifically to that post or that paper by Hansen. I'm referring to all research by all climatologists, where there is disagreement that CO2 is factor in global warming. You seem to need 'convincing' that CO2 is not the cause of global warming.
You can't argue with a liberal, especially a canuke, they have no grasp that the Earth has been going through climate changes since the beginning and that the same stupid liberals were saying we were going into a global freeze in the 70s. Weathermen can't even predict the weather day to day, yet these dumb asses think that they can predict that the earth will burn. THEY DON'T HAVE A CLUE!!!! They ignore real threats that have attacked us like terrorist, accuse Republicans of using fear tactics, yet they call and lie to old people about losing government aid and global warming. I think I'll go out and punch a liberal to day all in the name of Free Speech , an aclu one at that!!

nostatic 06-22-2006 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Racerbvd
I think I'll go out and punch a liberal to day
nice to see the 5th grade playground is alive and well. I think that girl in the braces likes you...but she has cooties!

JSDSKI 06-22-2006 09:04 AM

This is from CNN.com this morning - top story:

Study: Earth hottest in 400 years
The Earth is the hottest it has been in at least 400 years, probably even longer. A panel of top climate scientists told lawmakers that the Earth is running a fever and that "human activities are responsible for much of the recent warming."

It's hard to imagine that people still think the technological age beginning only 125-150 years ago has had this much impact on the earth's climate. It's even harder to understand that some still believe current global warming is fundamentally a natural cycle.

Moneyguy1 06-22-2006 09:05 AM

The most dangerous thing in the world is a closed mind.

JSDSKI 06-22-2006 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gaijindabe
Big cause, lots of money, lots of social engineering. Lots of what we know is best for you.
Sounds just like "War on Terror", "Faith Based Initiatives" and "Changing the Face of the Supreme Court", to me.

Face reality, brother, all sides act the same once in power.

That's the reason they want power in the first place - to institute their beliefs into government policy and move the culture in a direction that makes them happy and comfortable.

fastpat 06-22-2006 09:13 AM

Re: Why do liberals fear gloabl warming more than conservatives?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by daepp
Interesting observation by Dennis Prager...

"Observers of contemporary society will surely have noted that a liberal is far more likely to fear global warming than a conservative. Why is this?

After all, if the science is as conclusive as Al Gore, Time, Newsweek, The New York Times and virtually every other spokesman of the Left says it is, conservatives are just as likely to be scorched and drowned and otherwise done in by global warming as liberals will. So why aren't non-leftists nearly as exercised as leftists are? Do conservatives handle heat better? Are libertarians better swimmers? Do religious people love their children less?"

Thw whole article is here

I think he's on to something!

Probably for the same reason another segment of the "great booboise'" became fearful of the collapse of America as a result of 20 guys that got lucky when the federal government refused to do its' duty on 9/11/2001.

914GT 06-22-2006 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JSDSKI
This is from CNN.com this morning - top story:

Study: Earth hottest in 400 years
The Earth is the hottest it has been in at least 400 years, probably even longer. A panel of top climate scientists told lawmakers that the Earth is running a fever and that "human activities are responsible for much of the recent warming."

It's hard to imagine that people still think the technological age beginning only 125-150 years ago has had this much impact on the earth's climate. It's even harder to understand that some still believe current global warming is fundamentally a natural cycle.

But they also admit there was a period of warming around 1000 AD and they are unable to assess its magnitude and whether or not it was similar to that occurring today. It also cannot specifically determine what the 'much' is as far as human activities - it very well could be part of a natural earth cycle. There's absolutely no doubt the earth has been in a warming trend, the paper only reinforces what has aleady been observed for hundreds of years. The proof it's caused by human activity still eludes us.

nostatic 06-22-2006 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
The most dangerous thing in the world is a closed mind.
no it isn't

Moneyguy1 06-22-2006 09:24 AM

Then what is?

IROC 06-22-2006 09:36 AM

Supposedly, we had a similar "warming" period in the 1920s/30s. I read an article in Popular Mechanics years ago that quoted newspaper articles from the 1930s that could have been written yesterday. They were all freaking out about "global warming". The funny thing is that the Earth then started cooling and continued to do so for the next 40 years or so.

Does anybody have any details about what went on in the 1930s?

While I am convinced that the Earth is warming (heck, it's 97 degrees outside right now with a heat index in the low 100s), but I am not convinced that there is anything we can do about it. Seriously. We cannot pinpoint to what extent "greenhouse" gases are contributing to the current warming. If we can't quantify that, then how can we quantify the mitigation of global warming by reducing the output of these gases? Can we really substantially reduce the output? I doubt it. Should we try? Maybe. We might simply be along for the ride at this point.

Mike

914GT 06-22-2006 09:38 AM

Already they are confused.

Earth is hottest now in 2,000 years, according to study that says humans responsible for much of the warming

Study Says Earth's Temp at 400-Year High

Take your pick. 400 years. 1000 years. 2000 years. The earth was as hot or hotter then before significant human activity.

nostatic 06-22-2006 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
Then what is?
asking 3 word questions

Moneyguy1 06-22-2006 09:47 AM

And 4 word responses?

Heehee.

nostatic 06-22-2006 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
And 4 word responses?

even worse


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.