Observation on bias
 

Recent posts have made me think (and it hurts, to quote Yosemite Sam).....

Why are so many people convinced that their view is absolutely correct and anyone who does not believe the same way are somehow flawed? Could this aspect of humanity be its ultimate downfall?

You are dead wrong.

We are all open to discussion and the adoption of new ideas. ;)

Re: Observation on bias
 

I think this is one of the most fascinating things about people and one of the things that draws me to PPOT. Some people can believe so strongly in something that others totally discount. Why is that? They both can't be right. Extremely interesting. I think that's why religious threads are so prevalent. Both sides can't be right, yet both sides are convinced that they are correct. I love it.

Mike

actually I think it is just the fringe that think they have ownership on the right ideas

Unfortunately some of them become president.

Ask Rodeo:D

...and his alter-ego lendaddy. ;)

You two guys are like the Bell brothers, Ding and Dong. :D :D :D

+1 (at least)

Is somebody at the door?

I am absolutely convinced that GWB has been bad for my country.

Under Bob's analysis, that apparently makes me "biased."

I am not a radical person, but when you oppose a radical administration, it makes you appear so, since you constantly disagree with their radical positions.

Yes, you are viewed here as the voice of reason.

ding er...dong...whatever:D

These are unreasonable times daddy. In historical context, I am pretty much dead center.

I know on this board, for instance, that opposing warrantless spying on Americans is considered "far left," but I also know that when the country returns to normal, that position will be viewed as a prefectly normal, even conservative viewpoint.

Oh yes, absolutely. :D

Dong....

That's not at all the argument and you know it. The question is one of wartime surveillance of enemy calls to/from our country. This is not even remotely close to the tipping point you paint it to be.

Level-headed people understand this, and your irrational response is what makes you extreme. The fact that you don't even accurately summarize the dispute makes you extreme..... your amazingly generous helpings of unwarranted drama and hyperbole make you extreme....

dong

The issue is warrantless spying on Americans, exactly as I have framed it.

Thanks for making my point.

The way you describe it a person must worry about all their calls being listened in on. That's not the case at all, not even close...but that's the way you present it for effect. You don't even try to have honest debate.

I would also note that your statement above leads the reader to believe that the target of the spying is the American citizen, which is not the case at all. Misleading is the name of the game.

That's such bull. The WHOLE ISSUE is WARRANTLESS and you KNOW IT......

Ding, Dong? You fellas gonna be needin' a room? ;)

I think you posted in the wrong thread. Were you arguing with someone about warrants? A mod can move your post.

OK, coolie, I know I'm going to regret this......but, should initating a call to or receiving a call from an overseas terrorist be grounds for a warrant?

Belongs right in response to your quote. Apparently your memory of 5 minutes ago is *****

Recap for the obvious Alzheimers dude, Lendaddy.

Rodeo:
I know on this board, for instance, that opposing warrantless spying on Americans is considered "far left," but I also know that when the country returns to normal, that position will be viewed as a prefectly normal, even conservative viewpoint.

Lendaddy:
That's not at all the argument and you know it. The question is one of wartime surveillance of enemy calls to/from our country. This is not even remotely close to the tipping point you paint it to be.

Level-headed people understand this, and your irrational response is what makes you extreme. The fact that you don't even accurately summarize the dispute makes you extreme..... your amazingly generous helpings of unwarranted drama and hyperbole make you extreme....


Cool_Chick
That's such bull. The WHOLE ISSUE is WARRANTLESS and you KNOW IT......

Don't bother CC ... when you argue with a radical, it makes you look like a radical yourself.

Ask me how I know :)

I'll quote myself for you coolie. What say you?

Anyway, my point is that this could be discussed in a rational way...but when Rodeo misrepresents what we're even talking about what's the point? Back in an hour or so....

I'm staying in my corner for this one.

It took me 5,000 posts, but I have learned something :)

I am at one with my duality. :p

Coolio? No answer to my question?

Wait, I got one...

Is the visable presence of a Wild Turkey Bottle in the passenger seat grounds for an assumed warrant to search a car?

If it means an all-out search for the hopefully now-nekkid female passenger, then yes.

WILD TURKEY SUCKS.

How's that for bias? :)

"I know on this board, for instance, that opposing warrantless spying on Americans is considered "far left," but I also know that when the country returns to normal, that position will be viewed as a prefectly normal, even conservative viewpoint."

Or opposition of the suspension of, lets say, habeus corpus. Color me radical.

Agreed:D


But how about a warrantless search of my person just because I crossed the yellow line?

Chicky?

We'll just color you Canadian, hows that?:D

Back to your corner Rodeo!

Only if it's an open bottle... ha ha... got you on that one... neener neener. :p

My 911 is biased toward the rear. As long as she's hot.

This thread went to ***** without my participation ... let that be a lesson to all of you :)

True, and only if the guy on the other end of the phone is a terrorist.:D

Hot rear? Who? No, don't even think of mentioning snowman! :eek:

Re: Observation on bias
 

I know what you mean and Pelican is just a small mirror of society. Narrow mindedness (is that the correct term?) is among the most intolerable traits in my book. It´s a stone age strategy that very much limits the possibilities for further development in any given situation.

Re: Re: Observation on bias
 

Are you being intolerant of my intolerance?