Quickest anyone ever got on your ignore list?!

[red-beard]

Oh, something like this...

[Icemaster]

Wow.

That looks just like my screen.

[red-beard]

Originally posted by legion
I have zero on my ignore list...but one clothing maker and one cowboy lawyer have come close.

Don't hold back!

[fastpat]

Originally posted by legion
I have zero on my ignore list...but one clothing maker and one cowboy lawyer have come close.

Ignore lists, with few exceptions, are for unmitigated whimps.

[fastpat]

Originally posted by procon
Took Mul's second incarnation to add the first & only member on my list. Didn't last long though, I can seem to resist watching a train wreck.

I think it was Techweenie who came up with the one close to valid reason to use the ignore function, but I can't remember what it was.

[928ram]

I think it was Techweenie who came up with the one close to valid reason to use the ignore function, but I can't remember what it was.

From time to time some one will be particularly long-winded or overly repetitive in a thread I'm trying to follow; this ,I think, is a valid reason to use the function. Tidies things up a bit.

[MRM]

It is perfectly valid to put someone on the ignore list because he keeps spelling "its" as "it's". While one may argue about whether socialism or facism are evil by definition (of course they are, but debate on the subject is healthy) abusing apostrophes in words only three letters long clearly is both evil by definition and is too hard on the eyes of a literate man to tolerate.

Hint, "it's" is a contraction (the reason for the apostrophe, get it?) So only use the apostrophe when you are using it's as short for "it is".

Not that anyone on this thread would abuse their native language that way.

[cantdrv55]

I can't stand that cantdrv55 guy.

[911boost]

That racist hate filled bastard Sports_Car didn't take long to get on my list. In 4 years that is the only person.

I can disagree with someone, but I still read what they have to say, who knows, maybe it is making me more well rounded.

I should add that I read what other members on the OT have to say, not all the damn cut and pastes. Sometimes they annoy me.

Plus, its pretty damn easy to ignore a thread.

[m21sniper]

Originally posted by Superman
This is Mul's THIRD appearance. Not his second. He's hoping to find the self-control and maturity to keep his remarks just barely tolerable enough to not get banned. Eventually he'll make it but even then, the next step would be to make remarks that are intelligent or insightful or helpful. Pipe dream.

I think Pat and Mul might find each other "hot." How can we get them acquainted?

I hate to break up your stupid little diatribe nit wit, but i've been running my own website with over 1600 members since 2002...you might want to check in to ask if i'm mul(if the 9 pix of me and my 928 i posted in the other thread are not enough, lolol).

www.a-10.org

You can also go here, a political message board of over 4500 registered users(and growing like wildfire) where i am one of the board co-founders:

www.worldaffairsboard.com

Or you can go to any of the 928 boards ive been posting on for oh, 3.5 years now.

Or you could simply continue to babble on like a moron.

Whatever suits you best.

[cantdrv55]

What's with the A-10? I used to work on those in South Korea when I was in the USAF. I haven't thought about them since 1986.

[m21sniper]

Hey bro, you should hop on over to my forum "Warthog Territories", we have hundreds of crewdogs, loadtoads, and hog drivers, past and present there.

http://forum.a-10.org/

Generally speaking, what's up with the A-10 is the A-10C/PE(Precision Engagement) program(Sniper XR targeting pods with full Paveway/JDAM capability), and the re-wing issues that are still bedeviling the fleet(there was a "Hog Up" program a few years back that addressed cracking issues at wing stations 9 and 11 IIRC, but it did not satisfactorilly address the issue). There's also a re-engine plan on the backburner, but it's currently unfunded.

Anyway, hope to see you stop in over at the forum!

[m21sniper]

Originally posted by dhoward
It's NOT mul.
I found him elsewhere.
Warthog.

Do you post on my forum bro?

What's your S/N?

[m21sniper]

Originally posted by Rodeo
I don't have one. I guess I can understand why people do it, but I find it kinda weird. Like a little kid sticking her fingers in her ears and singing out loud. La la la la la, I can't hear you

And guess what? You don't HAVE to read every post.

That's always been my philosophy.

But i guess some folks prefer the 'La la la la' approach better.

LOL.

[m21sniper]

Originally posted by mikester
[B]It really isn't about agreeing or disagreeing it is the manner in which the data is presented.

Case in point; Socialism is not evil.

To the contrary, socialism is evil because it is FORCED wealth redistribution. It's also thievery, but that's another issue entirely.

But, if you become offended to the point of ignoring me because i attacked "communism light", well, then, i can hardly stop you.

Now I'm not a socialist but I believe there are more than a few of our allies that are and I don't believe they are evil.

We used to be allied to the Soviet Union(during WWII for the history challenged among us).

Let me guess, they weren't evil either?

This sort of extremist philosophy is not one to be reasoned with.

It is not extremist to hold a view that a certain socialist crybaby finds offensive.

If someone cannot reasonably at least agree to disagree what is the point to listening to that person wail away about anything.

So if you said rapists were not evil and i insisted they were without 'agreeing to disagree', then that would make me an extremist too?

So in your world, people with firm convictions are extremists?

Well, that's intersting.

It's like that guy on the corner with the megaphone preaching the end of the world.

They're written words- which you have the option to simply not read.

I fail to see your rationale, but then, socialists and their apologists have always baffled me.