hypocrite; two faced, Heather mills Mcartney

[sammyg2]

This from a greedy psycho-skank that sued her ex for a huge amount of cash, even though they weren't married very long and she did absolutely nothing to help earn it:


McCartney's Estranged Wife Berates Rich
Nov. 21, 2007, 9:12 PM EST

The Associated Press

DUBLIN, Ireland -- Heather Mills McCartney, who is reportedly seeking millions of dollars in her breakup with Paul McCartney, denounced the world's rich as misers and snobs Wednesday.

Mills McCartney delivered the critical comments during her 90-minute speech to the debating society of Trinity College Dublin.

Former model Mills McCartney, 39, married the 65-year-old music legend in 2002 and gave birth to the couple's only child, Beatrice, a year later. But the couple separated last year, and McCartney filed for divorce alleging "unreasonable behavior" by his wife.

Mills McCartney said she was reluctantly obliged to befriend the world's wealthy because that was the only way to maximize her power as an agent for change.

"Sadly, you have to mix at a certain level of people to raise the level of funds you need to bring about the greater good," she said. "Because people are very snobby. These people who have lots of money, they're either snobby or they're stingy. If you have lots of money, you have to be stingy — because why would you want that amount of money?"
She also compared herself to human rights crusaders down through the ages, suggesting they all had been victimized for their beliefs.

"If you look at every single person in the history of the world who has tried to make a difference, you'll find a very long section of their lives where they were treated horrifically by the government or by the media," she said.

[Aerkuld]

I had to laugh at Mr. Clarkson on Top Gear the other week. His introduction of 'The Stig' was something like "...and if he was getting divorced from Sir Paul McCartney he'd keep his stupid little whining mouth shut!"

[URY914]

Didn't this B@tch get $100 million from Sir Paul?

[sammyg2]

Something like that which is the ironic part. She just said that if you want to have alot of money you have to be a greedy stingy snob, but I've read that she sued Paul for about $250,000 per day for every day the marriage lasted.
poor guy, he turned into a psycho-b!tch magnet all the sudden.

[Joeaksa]

Beyotch slapping is far too good for this one...

[sketchers356]

But how about cratch?

[Zeke]

While she may appear to be an ingrate, I'd be willing to listen to more of her as long as it has some logic. So far as the story goes as reported by Sam, I can buy into her attitude about the rich. What about the rumors of his treatment of her?

[Shuie]

Is anyone going to admit to watching her on the 'Dancing With The Stars' just in case her prosthetic leg would have flown off?

[pwd72s]

We peons don't have a clue what really went on...

Anybody here remember the rock group...1960's..."The Turtles" ? They specialized in syrupy love songs. Anyway, a local girl married one of the members of that group. She made it back to this small town..a physical and mental wreck. Her parents, along with a bit of community support brought her back to reality.

Me? Slam Heather Mills because Paul was a member of the Beatles?

Let's just say I love the music...

[sammyg2]

OK, I'll retract my opinion until Milt gives me a better one. not.
I've watched this mess unfold.
I've watched Paul take the high road.
I've watched her go crazy, breaking into his house, breaking windows, vandalizing his cars, until the police are called. I've watched him say he wanted to keep a private matter private, I've watched her go on every talk show that will have her and blast Paul at every chance, contradicting her own accusations many times and then later complain that the media won't give her any privacy. I've seen her claim she doesn't want his mobey, then sue for $350 million.
Then when she only got $100 million she went crazy again.

You can go ahead and give her some smore slack through your rose colored glasses, I'll go ahead and see the world as it really is.

[Shaun @ Tru6]

Why are ultra-conservatives always worried about what other people have/do?

[artplumber]

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

Why are ultra-conservatives always worried about what other people have/do?

[svandamme]

me thinks Macka has only himself to blame

repeat after me:

"if, you have multimegasupermillions in the bank
then, you get a prenupt"

[sammyg2]

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

Why are ultra-conservatives always worried about what other people have/do?

Why do ultra-lib bleeding heats always have to politicize every single thread and defend those with no morals? It is professional courtesy?

To answer your question, I despise people like her. People who are greedy liars but pretend not to be. She attacks the rich for being greedy and stingy, but she worse. She is a wanna be that will become rich by unscrupulous means, not by earning it. Unless she thinks she earned it on her back and she can't be that good.

Just like I hate the lazy dishonest people who will sue anyone for any reason in hopes of hitting the lottery. To ignore the actions of these people is to accept it and I will not. I'm tired of watching the morals of the world go down hill. I'm tired of watching the libs destroy society for their own personal gain. I'm tired of them pretending to take a moral stance to cover up their ulterior personal greedy motives.

The difference bewteeen a conservative and a lib is that a conservative only asks for an chance to go out and work hard earn a living and then be allowed to keep it after he earns it.
A lib says we don't feel like earning a living, it's too hard, trhere are too many excuses, it's easier to blame others for our own shortcomings that to try and overcome them, why don't you just take al the money away from the conservatives and give it to us?
The conservatives earned it and we didn't, but we really want what they have so we can pretend taking it is the right thing to do and if we spin the truth around we can pretend that we deserve it.

[Racerbvd]

I only knew he was seeing a 1 legged chick (with his money, you would think he could afford a whole chick) and don't really care about what there do (did he beat her with her leg??)
It is a common fact that, while members of the Beatles may have been decent musicians with cool tunes, when it came to women, they were total flaming idiots, hell, Lennon hired someone to shoot him to get away from the ugly ***** who destroyed the band Thanks Shaun, you made me put thought into someting that I really don't give a poop abot, I WANT MY 2 MINUTES BACK!!!

[Dottore]

Originally Posted by sammyg2

I'm tired of watching the libs destroy society for their own personal gain.

What are you smoking and where can I get some?

[DARISC]

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

Why are ultra-conservatives always worried about what other people have/do?

Because I got MINE gahdammit an' I intend to KEEP it an' don' want NO ONE rockin' the freakin' boat, you dissatisfied "better idea" laden ultra-liberal?

Originally Posted by Dottore

What are you smoking and where can I get some?

You really wanna flirt with profound delusion!

[Nathans_Dad]

I am assuming then that she will be donating her entire fortune to the poor??

[sammyg2]

[QUOTE=DARISC;3603723]Because I got MINE gahdammit an' I intend to KEEP it an' don' want NO ONE rockin' the freakin' boat, you dissatisfied "better idea" laden ultra-liberal?

Just keep your stinking low-life hands off my wallet, and you can think anything you want. All you have to do is stop supporting and voting for the tax-raising bleeding heart poverty-pimp politicians and stop trying to spend my money and we will get along just fine.

I personally don't like it when the government takes $48k a year out of my paycheck so they can spend it on welfare scum or drug addicts (sounds like you are well familiar with that).
You bleeding hearts think it is a good idea to support those who are too lazy or low-life to support themsleves? Then you pay for them. Just don't do it with my money.

What's next, are you going to suggest that I am well off because I was lucky or privileged? That's standard operating procedure in the democrat manual but it's not even close.

I started working as a mechanic when I was 20. I worked hard, went back to school, and worked my way up to be a successful engineer and established a strong rep in a tough business.
The only privilege I had was parents with morals who taught me to work hard and if I wanted something I should go out and earn it.
I was taught that those who worked hard were rewarded and those who did not put in the effort would do without.
Too bad that's not a very popular notion anymore.

Instead of wasting my money trying to keep up with the jones or spending it faster than it came in, I SAVED it and INVESTED it. I bought a house and was very careful with every dollar. Now that house is almost paid for and I don't need to work anymore. I still work only because I want to.
No one gave me squat, I earned every bit so I think I'm justified in wanted to keep it and not give it to a bunch of poser-idealistic morons.

[artplumber]

Originally Posted by Nathans_Dad

I am assuming then that she will be donating her entire fortune to the poor??

This just in: "Noooo"