![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: san jose
Posts: 4,982
|
smart car
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Vancouver bc
Posts: 5,293
|
sister in law bought the top of the line one, 2 weeks ago.
Should have bought a Yaris IMHO. Really bad ride, awful manual/auto trans, noisy, great on gas, a joke to park. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lake Cle Elum - Eastern WA.
Posts: 8,417
|
Check the "Car and Driver" test. Not very flattering. IF you're buying for fuel mileage, you'll do almost as will with a Civic or Corolla and have a lot more comfort.
__________________
Bob S. 73.5 911T 1969 911T Coo' pay (one owner) 1960 Mercedes 190SL 1962 XKE Roadster (sold) - 13 motorcycles |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I drove one Sat. Gearbox is very odd. I don't quite understand how the fuel mileage can be so poor - 33 city, 41 highway. I can do much better than that in my Jetta TDI's and seat 5 people with luggage. I suppose it could be a fun little car to drive around the neighborhood - everybody smiles and waves when you're driving around.
__________________
1983 AUDI Turbo Ur quattro 1987 PORSCHE 944 turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Zink Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 4,007
|
Stupid fad. Mileage is no better than a nice civic, corolla, hybrid. 2 Seats, poor safety, no utility. I don't get it.
__________________
Jerry 983 911 SC/Carrera Franken car, 1974 914 Bumblebee, 1970 914-4 |
||
![]() |
|
naturally aspirated
|
Its not designed for here and they are about as stupid as a Maybach. In France/Germany the Smarts are everywhere, which is where they belong.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MD
Posts: 5,733
|
When I first read it was coming here a few years ago I thought maybe I'd buy one. Now that I see what it's turned into, no chance I'll own one. For the $$ I'd much rather have a Civic or Fit and a pile of cash in the backseat.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 5,472
|
Lots of them around here. I think they're neat little cars, I'll certainly be interested in one as a second vehicle when they become cheap used cars.
However, as a practical vehicle they just don't make any sense to me. Less room then a Yaris, and a VW diesel gets better mileage.
__________________
Jake Often wrong, but never in doubt. '81 911 euro SC (bits & pieces) '03 Carrera 4s '97 LX450 / '85 LeCar / '88 Iltis + a whole bunch of boats |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Strong points on styling, and I liked the handling on my test drive last year.
The engine is in the rear.................gotta love that aspect of it.
__________________
1977 911S Targa 2.7L (CIS) Silver/Black 2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe (AWD) 3.7L Black on Black 1989 modified Scat II HP Hovercraft George, Architect |
||
![]() |
|
Slumlord
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,983
|
Totally over-priced for what you get.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Just like a new Porsche, so just buy pre-owned.
__________________
1977 911S Targa 2.7L (CIS) Silver/Black 2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe (AWD) 3.7L Black on Black 1989 modified Scat II HP Hovercraft George, Architect |
||
![]() |
|
Feelin' Solexy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 3,792
|
Quote:
I can see their utility for living in a city where your other major option is a motorcycle, but as others have stated it doesn't have much to recommend it if you have space for any other econobox.
__________________
Grant In the stable: 1938 Buick Special model 41, 1963 Solex 2200, 1973 Vespa Primavera 125, 1974 Vespa Rally 200, 1986 VW Vanagon Syncro Westfalia, 1989 VW Doka Tristar, 2011 Pursuit 315 OS, 2022 Tesla Y Gone but not forgotten: 1973 VW Beetle, 1989 Porsche 944, 2008 R56 Mini Cooper S |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Gon fix it with me hammer
|
scary on highways
__________________
Stijn Vandamme EX911STARGA73EX92477EX94484EX944S8890MPHPINBALLMACHINEAKAEX987C2007 BIMDIESELBMW116D2019 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What do they cost?
__________________
Jacksonville. Florida https://www.flickr.com/photos/ury914/ |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
I respectfully disagree with that opinion, based on what I've seen and heard of the design of the smart. Granted, with a lack of mass, there is very little impact absorbsion, but there is a very, very strong passenger compartment area which does a fantastic job of protecting the occupants from intrusion in an impact. There are very few cars that are designed with as much safety in mind as the smart. The problem is - given it's size, there's only so much they can do. - Z-man.
__________________
2010 Cayman S - 12-2020 - 2014 MINI Cooper S Coupe - 05-17 - 05-21 1989 944S2 - 06-01 - 01-14 Carpe Viam. <>< |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
EDIT: 04/09/08
I went to the Smart Dealership yesterday. Convertible: $17,500 Coupe: $14,500 .............and a long waiting list. .................................................. ........see pictures on page 2 Posted by james on April 27, 2006 at 11:46 AM http://www.retrothing.com/2006/04/smart_car_poise.html Quote:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=117630 Quote:
http://www.erynn.ca/smart%20car%20cost.htm Quote:
__________________
1977 911S Targa 2.7L (CIS) Silver/Black 2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe (AWD) 3.7L Black on Black 1989 modified Scat II HP Hovercraft George, Architect Last edited by kach22i; 04-09-2008 at 08:31 AM.. |
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Honestly, if you're in the market for that type of car, check out the Honda Fit. I came this close to buying one - they handle well, have plenty of interior room, and get about the same mileage as a Smart.
__________________
Steve Wilwerding 1998 3.4L Zenith Blue Boxster 2009 Meteor Gray Cayenne |
||
![]() |
|
Zink Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
I drive an old 911 and race a Formula V so safety for myself isn't my #1 buying concern. My main issue with the Smart is the $'s you pay for what you get. That calculation makes no sense. But neither does driving a 25 year old Porsche to most people ![]()
__________________
Jerry 983 911 SC/Carrera Franken car, 1974 914 Bumblebee, 1970 914-4 |
||
![]() |
|
naturally aspirated
|
The Smart cars were also designed to use less parking space. In Europe, you'll see two Smart cars share one standard size parking space. You'll also see them parked on the side walk without taking too much space. See what happens if you try doing that here. The car was not designed for America.
|
||
![]() |
|
Slumlord
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,983
|
It's fine to say they are designed to bounce on impact, but controlled decelleration is preferable, hence the development of crumple zones.
And with pick-up trucks and SUV's on the road you are at a decided disadvantage, I think that's pretty obvious. Z-man - shouldn't you be declaring a conflict of interest here? |
||
![]() |
|