45th Anniversary Mustang Fastback
 

<embed type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/largeplayer011008/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf' id='mediumFlashEmbedded' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' bgcolor='#000000' allowScriptAccess='always' allowFullScreen='true' quality='high' name='undefined' play='false' scale='noscale' menu='false' salign='LT' scriptAccess='always' wmode='false' height='275' width='305' flashvars='playerId=011008&playerTemplateId=fncLar gePlayer&categoryTitle=&referralObject=6206998&ref erralPlaylistId=playlist' />

be sure and tell us if anyone you know gets one.

$65k, i'll pass.

I'd pay $65K in a heartbeat....but I know damned well I couldn't get one for that. (edit) Question Austin...have you ever driven a new Mustang with the "track pack" suspension? Wanna make a small bet that my Bullitt Mustang, 100% stock, wouldn't beat your P-car on it's current street tires on a skid pad?

I think the two latest two mustangs (is the newest one out yet) that are retro look great. I think the camaro is OK visually. I think the new Challenger looks pretty hot. I still wouldn't have any of the three. They are way, way too common. Around here they are second only to trucks which is saying something.

We rented a Mustang for fun a while back and were impressed. I still want to try the Camaro out being an old Chevy fan.

A friend of my dads is building a '67 GT500 fastback. Sadly the motor is not the original but its still a very slick car.

My BF in highschool had a 65/351. Man we had fun in that car. He ended up dying in it though.
:(

When did he swap the 351 in?

yeah....that would have been a 289.

IIRC, a 265 in '65...289 in '66. But I could be wrong...

I had a 64.5 , it was a 289.

I think they were a six, then 260, then 289

Brother spotted one in Vegas. Snapped with his phone:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1245727718.jpg

Memory jogged...I believe you're correct.

The very early ones had a 260.

I think you are right on that one. I had a 64.5 with a 289 which I later swapped out for a 289 cobra. The original 289 in that car had a generator and later models had an alternator.

Gotta love this.....

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CpUDrd8L9Hg&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CpUDrd8L9Hg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Just started the early steps of restoring my Wife's '65 Mustang. Her parents bought it new and it's what she was driving when we met..

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1245798545.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1245798612.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1245798679.jpg

Pic of the engine, going to need some work..
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1245798916.jpg