![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
|
Generating electricity
Not being very knowledgeable in the subject I will ask the experts. Would it be economically feasible to generate enough electricity for a small house in the Houston area using the earth as a heat sink and solar panels as a heat source with propane as the transfer medium. A piston type motor would drive the generator.
|
||
![]() |
|
Cogito Ergo Sum
|
You need you a Gererator.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
No idea - sounds pretty experimental, yes? Solar PV panels and solar water heating, that would be the proven technology.
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211 What? Uh . . . “he” and “him”? |
||
![]() |
|
Detached Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
|
Not sure what you're getting at. Are you talking about heat transfer of fluid? How would the piston move? Look up on wikipedia and search for gas refrigerator and tell us if that is what you're thinking about. I wouldn't use propane for a transfer fluid for anything.
__________________
Hugh |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
"generate enough electricity for a small house in the Houston area"
No. Unless you plan to suffer along w/o a/c. People survived that way long ago - does not mean it is fun. You could put up a bunch of PV panels, collect a govt. subsidy to help w/the cost; feel good about it; and sell to the elec. co. or keep the watts on site... it would likely be "booster power" not handle all your needs. that would help quite a bit but not pay for itself over 10, or even 20 years. Now if you wait 10 years, we will likely have some nice cheap PV panels out there... it's all relative. Last edited by RWebb; 06-29-2009 at 10:49 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
|
Operation
The solar panel would vaporize the propane and the increased volume would drive the piston motor thereby driving the generator. The motor would exhaust the gas and the gas would be pushed into the earth cooling piping to condense the vapor back into a liquid. There would be a check valve to force the flow in one direction.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Detached Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
|
You'd want a series of successively smaller pistons to claim the rest of the enthalpy.
__________________
Hugh |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
|
Re.: Operation
I believe the mechanical operation will work. I have read the earth has a constant temperature below a certain number of feet and all of this varies with the area of the country. Around Houston it is supposed to be some were about 55-60 degrees below 4-5 feet but I am not sure.The information I am lacking is the amount of piping in the earth to condense the vapor continually and the amount of solar panel area to absorb the required BTU. The propane would be at the required vapor pressure to operate within this temperature range.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
|
Re: Hugh R - the would work like steam engines with variable diameter pistons for the same reason.
|
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Texas certainly does have a good environment for solar
Quote:
...but you need lots of area and lots of equipment.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Detached Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
|
Yeah, if you want to use something really dangerous, like propane, why not just go for anhydrous ammonia? That's what commercial refrigerator used to use, they may still.
__________________
Hugh |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
|
Propane - dangerous
Propane would be dangerous to use in a home or car AC due to the location of an ignition source but this system would be away from any ignition source and I do not think there would be that great of volume. It is also cheap and plentiful (relatively speaking). |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
which begs the question; why not just burn it for energy?
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
|
RE: The propane would be used much like a refrigerant, it would not be burned.
|
||
![]() |
|
Unconstitutional Patriot
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: volunteer state
Posts: 5,620
|
Quote:
I ran the numbers for using a small Lister diesel engine, biodiesel, and a generator for making electricity. The expense, complexity, and labor lost out to grid power at 11 cents/KW. I also considered buying an outhouse and diesel fired boiler to heat water and my home. Despite cost savings using homebrew biodiesel, it still could not match the cost of natural gas. Sure, if I was off-the-grid, it would be more attractive, but I was faced with sacrificing time for no cost savings. Hard to justify the investment with infinite payback time. The problem I see with your idea is you'd need significant pressure to move that piston. Or, you could make the piston larger, but then you'd need more vapor. More vapor = more solar panels. Your theory is very similar to solar vacuum tubes used for water heating. The tubes are placed under vacuum to minimize heat loss and increase efficiency. The medium is vaporized by the heat of the sun. The vapor rises and condenses on a manifold at the end of the tube. That heat is eventually transferred to water. Solar water heating should receive greater focus in America. It's proven, efficient, and can immediately reduce energy usage, particularly in the sunny Southern US. |
||
![]() |
|
abit off center
|
Just tap in before the meter
__________________
______________________ Craig G2Performance Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,852
|
I was curious about geothermal heating and cooling, so I did a little research (I did say 'a little'). I saw/heard/read someplace that Houston would be a hard place to manage it because of the heat. I know that my tap water comes out of the ground at over 80* during the summer. I think you'd need a lot of pipe, and it would have to be fairly deep.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Unoffended by naked girls
|
100 ballons and flannel shirts.
__________________
Dan 1969 911T (sold) 2008 FXDL www.labreaprecision.com www.concealedcarrymidwest.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Posts: 206
|
My understanding is that you would use the 55-60 deg-F earth has a huge heat sink. In a normal A/C unit you have to compress the freon, this is where most of the energy cost comes from. If you install a bunch of underground piping that is filled with water or air you can move this air or water for a much lower cost than compressing refrigerant. No propane needed just air or water.
__________________
1980 SC 71 Chevelle SS454 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Posts: 206
|
and a lot of land
__________________
1980 SC 71 Chevelle SS454 |
||
![]() |
|