![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 5,850
|
Dreamliner first flight
Anybody see the video or pictures ?
I *know* conceptually that the composite wings and spars are a good things, though the spars had to be reinforced with real metal as they cracked before, but watching that plane's wings practically do the "YMCA" on take off and landing really bothers me... It looks wrong... I know gliders do too, I'm sure flexible is a good thing, but that flexible? it's gonna take some getting used to... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,161
|
You would REALLY hate the wing flex in the Boeing B-52 then.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
UnRegistered User
|
I thought the Dreamliner was the big mombo jet, competition for the Air Bus double decker...
Boeing claims 'historic day' with Dreamliner test flight - CNN.com
__________________
Bill K. "I started out with nothin and I still got most of it left...." 83 911 SC Guards Red (now gone) And I sold a bunch of parts I hadn't installed yet. |
||
![]() |
|
abit off center
|
If they don't flex they break. Gives you a smoooooother ride too....
__________________
______________________ Craig G2Performance Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 5,850
|
Quote:
I know smarter people have calculated all this, and I've flown a glider once, I know it's a good thing, but sheesh, it looks..... weird !!! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 1,925
|
Here are some milestones for the 787. Check out the wing break testing.
Boeing 787 Dreamliner Milestones |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
It'll be legen-waitforit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 6,975
|
Sorry full size, half span is not a valid test
__________________
Bob James 06 Cayman S - Money Penny 18 Macan GTS Gone: 79 911SC, 83 944, 05 Cayenne Turbo, 10 Panamera Turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 5,850
|
+1... I looked at the video and also thought that was the inboard portion of the wing... i'd like to see them do that on a full "clothed" wing ! It's the outboard portion that really deflects a lot, flaps around, and looks odd on the video....
Again, I'm not criticizing the engineering, it just *looks* freaky ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,673
|
Chase planes are Lockheed T-33's. First built 60 years ago, but those may be newer; but not new.
Haven't seen one of those flying for decades. When I was a kid, the New Mexico ANG flew them from Albuquerque. Significance? Anyone know? Last edited by tcar; 12-21-2009 at 02:15 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
How many initial planes did they build? I'm guessing more than one right? I mean with that much at stake if they somehow lost the plane in a crash or fire I would imagine it could be devastating to Boeing if they didn't have others waiting in the wings.
Definitely a different look (wings) but it does look like a comfy ride ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,044
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,044
|
|||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Apparently, they could bend until the tips would touch.
![]() Certainly, at that point, they wouldn't return to where they started, but they wouldn't break either.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
abides.
|
Deceptive manipulation of numbers! Witchcraft! Burn them!
__________________
Graham 1984 Carrera Targa |
||
![]() |
|
abides.
|
I think the first flight was an elaborate hoax staged by the illuminati to manipulate boeing stock prices. The video you see is just a scale model filmed on a sound stage in rural British Columbia.
__________________
Graham 1984 Carrera Targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,179
|
Carbon fiber does not fatigue like aluminum. Thus flexing can be allowed much moreso than with aluminum rib and spar construction.
A carbon fiber stress-strain curve is practically a straight line to yield. Keep it under a certain point and you will never strain fatigue a part.
__________________
M |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 1,925
|
During the full scale static stress test, the wing tips were deflected 18 feet from static position... and no failures. These wings were designed to "flap".
http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=13&item=964 Last edited by abisel; 12-17-2009 at 01:26 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,510
|
Any pilots here? Perhaps you could tell me why the footage always showed gear down. Cindy's been asking about this. I said probably because it's a test flight and is standard procedure...but I'm just guessing.
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 1,925
|
pwb72s,
It is procedural. They always do first flights of any new aircraft (civil or military) with gear down. Mainly because they don't want to retract the gear and then have a failure in which the gear won't extend. Not a good thing. Subsequent flights they will cycle the gear. |
||
![]() |
|