Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   PPOT Rules of Debate (for those of you who missed the memo) (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/524841-ppot-rules-debate-those-you-who-missed-memo.html)

Dottore 02-04-2010 08:59 AM

PPOT Rules of Debate (for those of you who missed the memo)
 
Since (as is apparent from other threads) some of you didn’t get the memo about the new PPOT Debating Rules, I thought I should draw the key points to your attention.

They’re really quite simple.

1. Forget facts. Facts are not important. Important is that you weigh in on a subject as though you understood it. When you know absolutely nothing about a topic, a quick look at Wiki will bring you up to speed in no time. Quote liberally from Wiki, but always disguise your quote, because, hey, everyone else is reading Wiki too.

2. Logic? What’s that? No need to be rational. Just say whatever comes to your mind. If anyone disagrees with you just call them names. (*******, asshat and douchenozzle are perennial favorites.) And if that doesn’t work, mail the mods in a huff and ask them to move the thread to PARF.

3. Post frequently on the gun threads. This will give you a certain gravitas that is highly respected here.

4. Finally, and most importantly, you must carefully construct, cultivate and mythologize your on-screen persona. This will make you irresistible to the new generation of grasshoppers on PPOT.

You could for example be a Falstaffian, Zorbaesque guru of infinite wisdom, taste and prescience, who is disturbingly close to his mother and whose only vice is gluttony. Or you could be an international man of mystery who drives important people to exotic lands on a jet plane, drinks flagons of whisky and rogers his cabin crew thrice daily, and then posts at length about his solitary adventures on the Hershey Highway from distant hotel rooms. Or you could be a mysterious man of action who writes poetry and draws ancient dragons, drives the best car in automotive history, dates scary black Russian lesbians with PhDs on internet forums, and spends long nights alone sharpening his Katana sword. Or you could keep it simple and just be a completely daft religious nut job who quotes scripture in reply to every issue raised. Or even better: a rock star! The possibilities are endless, and the only limit your imagination.

Hope this helps.

kaisen 02-04-2010 09:01 AM

I disagree, douchehat!!

Why isn't this in PARF!?

vash 02-04-2010 09:04 AM

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1265306651.gif


great stuff.

GH85Carrera 02-04-2010 09:04 AM

This should end in a fight, or debate.

I is impossible to "debate" someone that sees a fact in a different way than you can imagine possible.

Many topics are what one person sees as a fact and it really just an opinion. "Because I KNOW this to be true you must be wrong". If I believe that pink unicorns are real there is no way to prove me wrong and that applies to any strongly held belief.

BRPORSCHE 02-04-2010 09:07 AM

I see this thread going down the hershey highway quickly.

Azzhat.

onewhippedpuppy 02-04-2010 09:12 AM

Well played sir, I can't even discipher if that should have been typed in green. In which case I will default to calling you a douchebag and move on with my day.:D

herr_oberst 02-04-2010 09:12 AM

This is too damn funny. Best thing, you're safe from retribution, because the illustrations you cite won't recognize themselves - rock-star included, because he comes across as too modest to see himself as one.

Roosterrusek 02-04-2010 09:17 AM

Only two appropriate ways to insult here....

When referring to a male, the term is "douchenozzle".

When referring to a chick, the term is "swampdonkey".

Roosterrusek 02-04-2010 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roosterrusek (Post 5165028)
Only two appropriate ways to insult here....

When referring to a male, the term is "douchenozzle".

When referring to a chick, the term is "swampdonkey".

So...as an example, when someone wants to smack down Dipso, they say "Dipso, you are such a swampdonkey"

Tervuren 02-04-2010 09:20 AM

I should edit Wikipedia with rules of debate other than what is posted here, and then prove you wrong!!! But my time is far more important because I'm not a ******* like the rest of you morons.

pwd72s 02-04-2010 09:21 AM

I feel slighted

Taz's Master 02-04-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 5164986)
Since (as is apparent from other threads) some of you didn’t get the memo about the new PPOT Debating Rules, I thought I should draw the key points to your attention.

They’re really quite simple.

1. Forget facts. Facts are not important. Important is that you weigh in on a subject as though you understood it. When you know absolutely nothing about a topic, a quick look at Wiki will bring you up to speed in no time. Quote liberally from Wiki, but always disguise your quote, because, hey, everyone else is reading Wiki too.

2. Logic? What’s that? No need to be rational. Just say whatever comes to your mind. If anyone disagrees with you just call them names. (*******, asshat and douchenozzle are perennial favorites.) And if that doesn’t work, mail the mods in a huff and ask them to move the thread to PARF.

3. Post frequently on the gun threads. This will give you a certain gravitas that is highly respected here.

4. Finally, and most importantly, you must carefully construct, cultivate and mythologize your on-screen persona. This will make you irresistible to the new generation of grasshoppers on PPOT.

You could for example be a Falstaffian, Zorbaesque guru of infinite wisdom, taste and prescience, who is disturbingly close to his mother and whose only vice is gluttony. Or you could be an international man of mystery who drives important people to exotic lands on a jet plane, drinks flagons of whisky and rogers his cabin crew thrice daily, and then posts at length about his solitary adventures on the Hershey Highway from distant hotel rooms. Or you could be a mysterious man of action who writes poetry and draws ancient dragons, drives the best car in automotive history, dates scary black Russian lesbians with PhDs on internet forums, and spends long nights alone sharpening his Katana sword. Or you could keep it simple and just be a completely daft religious nut job who quotes scripture in reply to every issue raised. Or even better: a rock star! The possibilities are endless, and the only limit your imagination.

Hope this helps.


Should this post be submitted to wikipedia as an illustration of irony or sanctimony?

BeyGon 02-04-2010 09:24 AM

I know you are just trolling but you forgot one description

Il Dottore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

creaturecat 02-04-2010 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeyGon (Post 5165048)
I know you are just trolling but you forgot one description

Il Dottore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia






http://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/wat3.gif
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/wat3.gif
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/wat3.gif

Jeff Higgins 02-04-2010 09:43 AM

That was all way too hard to understand, so, if you don't mind, I will continue to contribute as the resident drunken Irish, gun toting, Harley riding bastard I am. Anyone who believes a god damn thing I say does so at their peril.

Jim Richards 02-04-2010 09:50 AM

Rebuttals should always take on one of the the following two forms:

"So, you prefer that (insert stoopid blather here)?" or

"So, you're saying that (insert made up fecal matter)?"

And make sure to use the term asshat liberally, and the term liberal as only a fascist fanatic can. Unless of course you're a leftist/commie. Then you must call out the mouthbreathers.

Debate? We doan need no stinkin' debate!

kach22i 02-04-2010 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 5164986)

Hope this helps.

Yes it does.

Thanks for the tips.;)

m21sniper 02-04-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 5164986)
Since (as is apparent from other threads) some of you didn’t get the memo about the new PPOT Debating Rules, I thought I should draw the key points to your attention.

They’re really quite simple.

1. Forget facts. Facts are not important. Important is that you weigh in on a subject as though you understood it. When you know absolutely nothing about a topic, a quick look at Wiki will bring you up to speed in no time. Quote liberally from Wiki, but always disguise your quote, because, hey, everyone else is reading Wiki too.

2. Logic? What’s that? No need to be rational. Just say whatever comes to your mind. If anyone disagrees with you just call them names. (*******, asshat and douchenozzle are perennial favorites.) And if that doesn’t work, mail the mods in a huff and ask them to move the thread to PARF.

3. Post frequently on the gun threads. This will give you a certain gravitas that is highly respected here.

4. Finally, and most importantly, you must carefully construct, cultivate and mythologize your on-screen persona. This will make you irresistible to the new generation of grasshoppers on PPOT.

You could for example be a Falstaffian, Zorbaesque guru of infinite wisdom, taste and prescience, who is disturbingly close to his mother and whose only vice is gluttony. Or you could be an international man of mystery who drives important people to exotic lands on a jet plane, drinks flagons of whisky and rogers his cabin crew thrice daily, and then posts at length about his solitary adventures on the Hershey Highway from distant hotel rooms. Or you could be a mysterious man of action who writes poetry and draws ancient dragons, drives the best car in automotive history, dates scary black Russian lesbians with PhDs on internet forums, and spends long nights alone sharpening his Katana sword. Or you could keep it simple and just be a completely daft religious nut job who quotes scripture in reply to every issue raised. Or even better: a rock star! The possibilities are endless, and the only limit your imagination.

Hope this helps.

Are you rankled because you defended a pedophile and dozens of posters called you a lot of nasty names?

Don't you think a moderator should start a thread like this? Or are you not nuanced enough to make that realization?

Net nanny.

PS: I sure didn't get any memo.

M.D. Holloway 02-04-2010 09:57 AM

What about sea monsters, vaginas and kid posts? Where is the debate rules for those?

Superman 02-04-2010 11:01 AM

Bravo, Bravo! I just wish I had received the honor of a caricature. Or did I? Or do I?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.