![]() |
He appears to be the victim of an illegal search & seizure.
Do you really want the cops to be able to bust in your front door if you accept & write about something someone else found and gave to you?? Even if Chen was not given the phone by someone who found it (i.e the 3rd party stole it) should a warrant have issued to bust in and search his home?? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have no sympathy for him. I was involved in a business transaction where the other party requested a concession far in excess of what was legally allowed. The likelihood of getting tagged for it was pretty insignificant. On advice of my attorney I killed the deal as I would have been aiding in the commission of a fraudulent act. Considering the fraudulent portion of the deal was 6 figures I'm sure it would have carried felony penalties. He either got some pretty bad legal advice or chose to ignore it and take the risk. |
"when you're accused"
"willing accomplice" - you guys are missing something - it is called probable cause & is enshrined in the Constitution there is a tiny tiny chance that the cops somehow had probable cause but I'd REALLY like to see the evidence |
his computer may have the evidence your looking for..... what if the guy next to him slipped him a "ghb" beer...... remember Gizmodo offered 100,000$$ for 1 hour with an Ipad before it was launched, how many $$$ have they made off of this, the prototype had a plastic case over it, that looked pretty hard to get off
|
Quote:
He posted a video of himself dissecting property that he bought from someone he KNEW was not the owner. No probable cause? Really? REALLY??? |
yeh - REALLY
he lives in the US - we have a Constitution here where the F do you live??? |
Quote:
I'd ask you to think carefully before you respond but I don't want you to hurt yourself. |
it is amazing how many legal and factual errors you can compress into a single sentence
|
actually the REAT team has not opened the computers up because Gizmodo is saying it is protected by the "Journalist' confidentiality clause, so before anything can be looked at do they fall under that... I say no, but I was just trying to get differing views on if bloggers are in fact journalist and protected http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2010/04/26/daily36.html
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, here's the list of observations from gizmo guys... • Front-facing video chat camera • Improved regular back-camera (the lens is quite noticeably larger than the iPhone 3GS) • Camera flash • Micro-SIM instead of standard SIM (like the iPad) • Improved display. It's unclear if it's the 960x640 display thrown around before—it certainly looks like it, with the "Connect to iTunes" screen displaying much higher resolution than on a 3GS. • What looks to be a secondary mic for noise cancellation, at the top, next to the headphone jack • Split buttons for volume • Power, mute, and volume buttons are all metallic Again, they didn't divulge any killer features about the product. Just that the iPhone is FINALLY getting some features that so many other phones have had for some time now. Oh wait . .this JUST in... the new iPhone has a special, customizable, voice activated vibe-mode --to control, fanboys just yell; yes Apple YES!!! . .. yes YES YES!!! :eek: |
island: "My HTC TouchPro 2 " yes yes yes...... HAHAHAHAHAHA LMAO what a 'piece'
|
Buying known stolen property- how does that protect a journalist?
That may/may not be the case, but I bet that is how they acquired the subpoena! Even a journalist is not protected if they did something illegal to acquire the source/story/whatever! |
I agree
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They are the 21st century newspapers. Quote:
District attorneys think everyone is guilty. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website