![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
My '92 Audi 100 used to routinely get 30-32 mpg cruising at ~65mph on the highway - until E10 came to play. Now I'm lucky to get 25-27mpg.
|
||
![]() |
|
Just thinking out loud
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Close by
Posts: 6,884
|
I like how Toyota is advertising a Prius getting 45mpg. It makes me laugh, I don't think either one of the two in the fleet get 45, I know the 07 I drive gets around 37 on good day, on the highway, driving down wind. However it has 150K and a clogged cat, at least that's the code it throws.
I'm not impressed.
__________________
83 944 91 FJ80 84 Ram Charger (now gone) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,482
|
Quote:
__________________
I love you guys outside this forum ![]() -Eric |
||
![]() |
|
canna change law physics
|
I am a firm believer that E10 is really E10/W10/G80. The only way that mileage should drop off is if there is water there.
__________________
James The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the engineer adjusts the sails.- William Arthur Ward (1921-1994) Red-beard for President, 2020 |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,832
|
25, 30, 45 mpg?......bah, whatever.
The only "true" hybrid daily driver on the market today is the Honda Insight: 70+mpg when driven considerately. That is more than double the milage of a 2011 Subaru, the same rating as 15 years ago. The Insight chassis and interior is based somewhat identically on the Toyota Prius, but the powerplant is considerably superior. All of this "recent debate" pales in comparison with the world cars designed decades ago. When you learn more about the history, the more it all seems comical. Last edited by john70t; 03-27-2011 at 05:15 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,482
|
Can ethanol and water co-exist in the same liquid?
__________________
I love you guys outside this forum ![]() -Eric |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,482
|
Quote:
__________________
I love you guys outside this forum ![]() -Eric |
||
![]() |
|
Cogito Ergo Sum
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
To answer the previous question, when it came time to buy a "new" car, what did I end up with? An unmolested 91 CRX Si. An honest 40MPG(@65-70MPH) and fun as heck to drive. The only issue is, it's a tin can, the only safety features are seat belts, acres of glass, and an active mind behind the wheel. There's no way in hell it would pass any federal standards 20 years later.
__________________
Tim 1973 911T 2005 VW GTI "Dave, hit the brakes, but don't look like your htting the brakes...what? I DON'T KNOW, BRAKE CASUAL!!!" dtw's thoughts after nearly rear ending a SHP officer |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,832
|
I try not to intake unknown and unwanted substances. Period.
But if I was to willingly inhale a known substance into my lungs, it would be within the framework of the constitutional fathers or common sense. The CAFE standards the OP mentioned, and of which I spoke of before,..ummm...speaks for themselves. 25mpg. Same as the Model T. Last edited by john70t; 03-27-2011 at 05:54 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,482
|
So without the, ahem, enhancement of such substances....
Please enlighten us and elaborate on how a 2011 Honda Insight is 'considerably superior' to a 2011 Toyota Prius
__________________
I love you guys outside this forum ![]() -Eric |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I had a new Opel GT in '73, I think. Seems like it got up in the over 30 mpg range.
|
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,832
|
The federal standards which require airbags and abs and traction-control directly contribute to the weight and milage of new vehichles.
This is all in relation to corporate insurance statistics in relation to the 7,500lbs vehicles, currently registered as "cars", which are now on the road. |
||
![]() |
|
300hp 1800lbs is the goal
|
I've been thinking about this......
get an old beetle (pre all this overweight safety shat) take the body off, turn it into a small ultralight dune buggy thing styled like an Ariel Atom, and put in a small diesel engine. Summer use only high mpg DD. Unfortunately, I don't think Canada will see summer again, it's still snowing. Run it off vegetable oil from Costco when diesel goes above $1.40cdn ![]() The laws for modified cars in Canada are so ridiculous, you need to start with something pre safety/mileage/emissions.
__________________
The '66 912 Bastardization project has begun. Note to PO's: LAY OFF THE FREAKING BONDO!!!! The science was settled: Earth was flat. Galileo : Flat Earth denier. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,832
|
Quote:
Now that I've officially declared myself decades free off marijuanna, aka the demon drug, we can now begin to discuss the federal CAFE standards of millions of American vehicles on the road daily. A more important and relavent comparison is the CAFE milage standards to those 20 years ago.... I beleive that was the intent of the original post. |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,832
|
The federal requirements are biased towards larger, faster, more expensive vehicles.
Everyone else pays more, in one form or another. Federal subsidy.(sp) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,482
|
Quote:
That's why they're called 'threads'
__________________
I love you guys outside this forum ![]() -Eric |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,832
|
Kaisen, you want to know why CAFE standards haven't improved in 100 years?
I'm sorry. I can't be of help there. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 7,482
|
However, let's also discuss CAFE and what it stands for: Corporate Average Fuel Economy
Anything under 8,600 pounds gross vehicle weight falls under the average. Ten years ago, twenty years ago, there weren't as many 'large' vehicles sold. Yet manufacturers STILL found ways to meet the CAFE standards. So even a 1/2 ton pickup that will be used to tow and haul is calculated in the average. They get considerably better fuel economy today than they did ten or twenty years ago. And since more of them are sold than hyper-mile economy cars, MORE fuel is saved in the SUV/CUV/Truck segments than will ever be saved by an Insight or Prius or Jetta TDI
__________________
I love you guys outside this forum ![]() -Eric |
||
![]() |
|
winter-hater club member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 24,705
|
gasoline to mechanical energy = 30% efficiency (someone will probably correct me), in an internal combustion engine. this isn't going to change. the rest is lost as heat, hence the relatively large radiator and coolant reservoir.
bmw was (is?) trying to do something with this heat by using it to create HP via steam. it looked VERY complicated to me. edit: i was optimistic, it seems: 15% http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/atv.shtml
__________________
2000 Corvette - ????, 2007 Buell XB9R - Astrid, 1996 Discovery - Piglet, 2000 Forester "COOL PRIUS!" - Nobody Ever Last edited by nynor; 03-27-2011 at 06:52 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|