How Aware Of Subliminal Influence Are You

[tabs]

Originally Posted by motion

Sorry, Tabby, but I am finished speaking on the subject, and have more important things to do, like spend money like a drunken sailor and chase young, blonde women. You have fun now

A Saint Augustine U are not.

[nynor]

Originally Posted by tabs

1. One needs to know your definition of the term "Emotional Baggage" so that a common understanding can be established. Or how clear is your understanding of the term or can you enumerate?

2. Dreams don't have substance is in affect what your saying. Dreams are a fact because you have them and as such they exist. They in some way represent you, your feelings and intellect. Therefore one can expo-late that you don't pay much attention to your feelings nor the meaning/reason for that those feelings convey. Back in the bad ole days when man lived in nature he had to pay attention to what his feeling meant or he got eaten...People only think things have changed..

3. "Fourth, fifth way etc"....your talking about PERCEPTIONS..and the inference is that art is somewhat of an intellectual endeavor...instead of the additional emotional aspect as well. The creation of Art is GENERALLY the point where intellect and emotion meet that results in a burst of energy or light which is the art.

1. you already defined it for us. even this monkey saw that.

2. you and i are going to have to agree to disagree on the definition of substance.

3. this is redundant.

and 4. you sure miss a lot of what is said. even by yourself.

[Geronimo '74]

Originally Posted by tabs

further the Liberal Progressive agenda has NOW PROVEN itself to be a FAILED NOTION of the 1930's.


The above sentence was posted by myself on another Thread on this Board. What makes it a very potent and affective sentence in casting aspersions on the "Liberal" agenda. What is it that makes it Effective on a subliminal level.

AFAIK, there are two types of subliminal messaging, audible and visible.

Audible would be playing a message at that is not consiously perceived (can be either a normal message or backmasked, played in reverse.

Visible would be showing a single image in a series of images (film). The one single image would be shown for such a short interval that it can not be individually perceived. (1/30th of a second or so)


I don't see where the sentence (or part of) could carry any subliminal message, unless you are referring to the 'strategic' placement of capital words.

BTW, the effectiveness of subliminal messaging is next to none has never been proven definitivly. (again AFAIK)

[tabs]

Originally Posted by Geronimo '74

AFAIK, there are two types of subliminal messaging, audible and visible.

Audible would be playing a message at that is not consiously perceived (can be either a normal message or backmasked, played in reverse.

Visible would be showing a single image in a series of images (film). The one single image would be shown for such a short interval that it can not be individually perceived. (1/30th of a second or so)


I don't see where the sentence (or part of) could carry any subliminal message, unless you are referring to the 'stratigic' placement of capital words.

BTW, the effectiveness of subliminal messaging is next to none has never been proven definitivly. (again AFAIK)

Granted that is the use of the term in the strictest sense. However with the placement of a word or an idea tthat has a designed effect on a less than conscience level is what I can do. So whatever term you would like to call it is OK with me...

BTW I am fully aware that by offering to leave the nomenclature open I am risking that some miscreant abuses my good nature.

[Geronimo '74]

Ok,
I think I don't understand the question anymore.
Only thing I see that could be considered a 'subliminal' effect is the strategic use of capital letter/words, no?

Or maybe this thread is about something else and I'm missing the point completely. (Which I sometimes am known to do... )

[tabs]

I generally use capitalized words in Bold to for emphasis. In a recent post on this thread I used the word GENERALLY to emphasize that I was generally speaking and that it was not a hard and fast rule.

The designed effect was the use of 1930's as I outlined in a previous post...That there is no forward thinking, nothing new or Progressive about ideas from the 1930's. Just the same tired old cr@p that we have heard before. So Progressives are in fact reactionaries. Which is a contradiction in terms as to how Progressives like to think of themselves as being forward looking.

[Taz's Master]

Originally Posted by tabs

U might say it is the same hapiness as cause and affect of when you can get it up, so you can stick it in and make em moan. The moaning is the validation that your affective and that makes me happy because I know am potent. Nobody wants to walk around with a limp one...


Yo soy muy macho hombre...

U would say that, not me. I might say that I'm great in bed, I come every time.

Knowledge that you are potent doesn't make you happy, but rather someone else recognizing your potency is what makes you happy.

[M.D. Holloway]

but what about a notion?

[Taz's Master]

Originally Posted by LubeMaster77

but what about a notion?

He bailed back at post 58