![]() |
|
|
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,507
|
Owner financing...pros/cons, caveats?
I've just begun kicking this idea around after a tenant has expressed interest in purchasing a SFH I own outright. Of course I have to perform due dilligence, but want to see what the PPOT braintrust has to say. As in all of my dealings, I'm not looking to take advantage of anyone, desire to protect "my" interests, and continue the "income stream" while coming up with a "win-win" for both parties. I've only talked briefly with my tenant (a LEO) before the holidays, and his wife is an attorney (DANGER
![]() ps: I do NOT want to be in the LL business indefinitely...it's provided a nice hedge, but man does it suck at times! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,954
|
Why can't they get financing through a regular lender?
|
||
![]() |
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,507
|
They probably could (if not right now, then eventually if they do not have a down payment at this moment). He expressed his "interest in buying eventually", which took me by surprise, and I've just now begun to consider my options.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Well KC911 I understand what u r trying to do. Maintain control by financing the house yourself. Why not rent to own and that way you maintain title and control?
If you finance yourself what would happen if the "new owner" defaulted and how do you get your house back? As the above poster says, what is wrong with them going to the bank? Tenants are tenants for a reason. Watch out on this one. Rent to own(properly drawn up with a lawyer) or bank financing would be my choices ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
wannabee wannabee
|
Quote:
__________________
99 C4 - (let's try this once more) 07 Cayman S - sold 11/17 (not the same) 84 Carrera - sold 3/16 (geez what have I done!) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
There are a lot of BS junk fees lenders charge that owners who finance would not. Of course, you run the buyer's credit and he pays for an appraisal and flood cert., title work, etc. But there are so many junk fees with lenders that can rack up into the thousands - doc. prep, underwriting, loan origination, tax service and plenty more. I'd look at owner financing just to avoid all that BS, if possible.
__________________
2022 BMW 530i 2021 MB GLA250 2020 BMW R1250GS |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Friend of Warren
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 16,496
|
Owner financing is a win-win for the seller. Not so much for the buyer. You have to make sure that you have a priority lien on the property and that your lien is recorded. This is a secured credit loan with the credit being the house. They fail to make payments, you have them evicted and you start over. Only downside is the same as that with a renter, takes a while to get them out and they may destroy the property in the meantime.
__________________
Kurt V No more Porsches, but a revolving number of motorcycles. |
||
![]() |
|
wannabee wannabee
|
Good point. You can factor that cost into the initial down payment as an added protection.
__________________
99 C4 - (let's try this once more) 07 Cayman S - sold 11/17 (not the same) 84 Carrera - sold 3/16 (geez what have I done!) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
This is a very important step. Of course, you'll hire a lawyer to write up this contract and he'll certainly to do this step - right?
__________________
. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Under some circumstances it can be win for the buyer. Many small businesses structure their expenses to minimize reported income and taxes. The cash flow of a successful business can look abysmal on paper and banks won't touch them. A seller finance can be away around that, but the seller has to be very careful to make sure he understands the buyer's true financial situation.
__________________
. |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Years ago, my dad bought a fixer-upper in the Poconos and over the course of a year or so, turned it into a new little starter home. When he sold it, he went the owner financing route. The money he got from the new owner was what he used to help put my sister and I through college. (We also had some grants and scholarships as well, of course)
If you have a decent buyer who checks out, and just wants to save some $$, owner financing is a viable option, and gives you, the seller a significantly more amount of $$ in your pocket, if you don't mind waiting the 15-30 years to realize this income. And if the buyer defaults on the loan, it is on you to evict him. In your case, it sounds like the owner is decent, you have a history with him. If your place is kept up nicely for now, I suspect they wouldn;t vandalize the property, and will likely buy your house with little or no issues. Just my $0.42, -Z
__________________
2010 Cayman S - 12-2020 - 2014 MINI Cooper S Coupe - 05-17 - 05-21 1989 944S2 - 06-01 - 01-14 Carpe Viam. <>< |
||
![]() |
|
Now accepting US $ at par
|
Quote:
Even with a recourse mortgage the risk for the lender is most often too high for comfort. It's one thing if you're a financial institution with a large book of mortgages, where the good stuff balances out the bad (IN THEORY), but if this mortgage is your entire "book"... can you afford to lose this asset? All it takes is the buyer not bothering to pay his insurance premium, house burns down... you're done. Tread carefully! Cheers d.
__________________
1985 911 Carrera Coupe 2015 Volkswagen GTI 6-spd some motorcycles |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lake Cle Elum - Eastern WA.
Posts: 8,417
|
I'm in the same boat, have great tennants and told them I could carry the contract when they have 10% down. They indicate that could be this coming summer.
Last year we talked about a "Lease to own". I did some research and the rules have really changed on those since the bank restructuring, so check that out if it's a consideration. My tennant had his credit go bad when he financed his son's $45,000 drug rehab on credit cards.....He's been in the house 2 yrs, pays $1,550/mo rent and never been a day late. I have just 2 concerns: 1) I'd probably be selling about close to the lowest of the market price, and 2) I don't want to lock myself in low interest rates (3.7 to 4.0) for 30 yrs, so would need language to address that. An advantage for both of us is to avoid a lot of fees. I know a guy that did this, went thru a de-fault/eviction and had to put some money in the house to get it ready to sell again. He came out OK in the end, but it took awhile. G'luck
__________________
Bob S. 73.5 911T 1969 911T Coo' pay (one owner) 1960 Mercedes 190SL 1962 XKE Roadster (sold) - 13 motorcycles |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
It only takes so long because banks have so many on their books. KC would have only one and would be able to start foreclosure actions the first day he deemed necessary. Still might take a while, but not the 18 mos. you can expect to live in a house for free before the sheriff comes to evict you.
__________________
2022 BMW 530i 2021 MB GLA250 2020 BMW R1250GS |
||
![]() |
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,507
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Thank you all who have responded, even if I didn't quote you above. I'm just kicking around my options. I'd also consider selling both and generating an income stream through other means, maybe a "bond ladder" (it can be very modest, and I'm still OK), but I like the idea of having "some" control over the properties for reasons I won't go into here. Is an option to "buy back" enforcable? Once again, thanks, and keep the ideas & suggestions coming... |
||||||
![]() |
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,507
|
Quote:
Maybe just keep renting for a few years? Hmmm.... |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,923
|
The worst case senario:
Foreclosures may take years in some areas. State laws and local conditions vary. They get a waiver from a judge and make minimal payments irregularly while delaying court dates. This game goes on for a long time. In the meanwhile, they live there for free and with the utilities and taxes in your name(against the law to shut off). You eventually end up with a stack of bills, and a building trashed and missing all the appliances. The best case senario: You make the interest instead of the bank. |
||
![]() |
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,507
|
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
. |
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,923
|
The above "worst case" is an example of what happened in my Michigan condo building.
The owner had some gutter people renting the place for a while, then sold it in an owner-financing(which eventually defaulted), then went back to renting to more gutter people. Meanwhile, he stopped paying association dues for years. A judgement against him was finally made with wages garnished, but the payments were periodic and only enought to stay out of court. The legal bills just got added to his debt, even though and it was a loosing game. I think it's illegal now to turn off water(humanitarian issue), and definitely heat in Michigan(an elderly veteran died from this because of a limited balance). I'm not sure about taxes, but the city will take the property. Period. Whatever the rules on liability of utility balances, I can guarentee you that whoever ends up with the property will be left with the outstanding bills. |
||
![]() |
|