![]() |
IMHO, if anything, the mission is tougher today. I would suspect that they would want them as big and strong and fast and tough as possible. Sorta like the NFL. The standards ought to be whatever is the best they can get out of whatever percentage they have available. Guys are much bigger and stronger than when I was that age, the standards ought to reflect that. They should be more challenging. You don't see them making taller, faster players in the NFL wear ankle weights to even things up for the lesser players.
I am pretty sure I can pass the current minimums (except the swimming) and I am old and only about 175 lbs. A monster that lives for this stuff like HH1944 is the kind of guy we need in elite combat forces. |
Well the women need to be only 65 as strong as the men since they only get paid 65 % of men's wages.
|
Forgive my ignorance, but of the original four training phases, why would you abandon "desert" when we've been at war in desert areas for a very, very long time now?
angela |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cheaper. |
Quote:
|
I wish the rangers, seals etc. would stop discriminating against skinny unfit guys like me.
|
This will be interesting to live through vicariously. My son starts 4/19 and is 4 weeks from finishing up his 5 month 2nd lieutenant BOLC school. He's spending the 3 weeks in between continuing his physical training. He just dropped off a guy he met and has become friends for his 4th attempt. Ben said about 5% make it through on time their first time through. Not sure how accurate that is. He's in great shape, fingers crossed. He may be in the first group with women in it.
On a side note, I hired a guy to do some work for me last year that had just gotten out of the infantry. He was on the shorter side and an avid weightlifter. 265 pounds when he started ranger school a few years ago. He didn't make it through. Got so dehydrated and lost so much weight after 6 weeks they put him in the hospital. He had lost over 60 pounds. His body type and muscle mass were not a good match for the physical requirements of the school. In hindsight he said he trained all wrong. Should have been building lean muscle and endurance not weightlifting constantly. |
Last I heard, graduation rate was nearly 50%....5% might be the number for selection to Regiment?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here's what RTBn says
Ranger School Statistics 60% of all Ranger School failures occur in the first 4 days (“RAP Week”): RPA, Land Nav, Footmarch, CWSA. 30% of all Ranger School failures occur due to Personal Reasons: Admin, Lack of Motivation, Special Circumstances. 10% of all Ranger School failures occur due to Academics: Patrols, Peers, Serious Observation Report, Medical Issues. Only 2.2% of all Ranger School failures are due to Patrols (Academic). Only 5% of all Ranger School failures are due to Patrols, Patrols/Peers, Patrols/Peers/Spots (Academic). 50.13% Overall Graduation Rate last 6 years (FY 06-FY 11) 37.2% Ranger Graduates Recycle at least 1x Phase of Ranger School 75% of those who complete RAP week will eventually pass the Darby Phase and move on to the Mountain Phase. Darby Recycle Rate is approximately 15%. 94% of those who start the Mountain Phase will eventually pass and move on to the Florida Phase. Mountain Recycle Rate is approximately 18%. 98% of those who start Florida Phase will eventually pass and graduate Ranger School. Florida Recycle Rate is approximately 18%. The United States Army | Fort Benning That makes a 31.2% pass rate with no recycles |
Quote:
|
Female butter bars in advanced land nav.......
|
Steve - Thank you for your service as a Ranger and an Instructor.......
|
Stats from the first Pre Ranger, the stats from the follow on Pre C's have been much worse.
- Class population: 122 total (male and female) - Female population: 25 - Number of females that met all of the physical standards: 5 - Number of females allowed to continue even though they did not meet some of the physical standards: 11 - The biggest physical discriminator: Push-up event during the RPFT; 17 of the 25 females failed the push-up event - 3 females failed the RTAC 6 mile ruck march in 90 minutes or less (Ranger school 12 mile ruck march in 3 hrs or less standard) - 83% of the females passed the Land Navigation test - Total female med drops: 8 - Total female LOM drops: 1 - Total female SOR drops: 1 You'll note that 11 females were 'allowed' to cont. even tho they did not meet the standard...that is a Chain of Command call and we know where the pressure for this 'success' comes from. It appears presently that the Army will not be able to fill the 30 female slots for the first mixed class. The females that got a go when they deserved a no go have about a snowballs chance in hell of being successful...not strong enough. Don't have the stats on the last Pre R course but I hear only one female made the cut....looks like the 'hard chargers' were in the first course. |
I don't understand why they're giving them a go when they're just going to get a no-go in the first 3 days.....unless they flex the standards there as well......it's like the Marine IOC all over again.
|
Quote:
Does not look good for that number. None of this crap meets the common sense experience test but we have to go there with this lib PC Shiite. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website