![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,270
|
Engineering Question
I want to create a crush zone on a round Al tube so it crushes straight. I've seen crush zones on square tube that are created with small dents or cut-outs at each corner on the square plane.
I want to replace the bumper shocks on impact bumper cars so tube is about 12 inches long, 2 inches in diameter and I would like to use 1/8" wall thickness. I was thinking of drilling holes in a honeycomb pattern for about 3 inches. Any thoughts?
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Now in 993 land ...
|
I am no expert, but if you look at steering columns, that should give you a good idea.
This one looks like expanded metal. It also appears like it was failing. Source: Suspension Steering Column Crush Tube Cracked |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,050
|
If you mill the cut outs it could be done. Don't ask me what the pattern would look like. That would take a real engineer.
|
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,824
|
(not an engineer)
For a gradual impact zone, I'm guessing the most holes/cutout would be at the very front for light taps. Then a small section of blank. Then a section of less holes for harder hits. The big energy starts transferring there. But the real problem with that design is the first part is already broken and doesn't transfer anymore. Ok. Ignore all the above. There should probably be a few safety wires in case the whole bumper randomly falls off and starts rolling under the car due to unseen damage. Another approach would be pipe cylinders inside cylinders. A section breaks and slides inside the next. Then another section breaks. But the problem with that design is all that overlap starts to add up in weight. Back to zero. To make it feasible, a few designs should be run through a CAD program and crunch the #s. The weight losses may be negligible and the potential damage to the rest of the car immeasurable. It might work well for bumper parking, but the insurance company might not cover any greater loss.
__________________
Meanwhile other things are still happening. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North of You
Posts: 9,160
|
Why not make a tube within a tube? Slip fit and tack weld...the tacks break and the inner tube slides in...
P. Eng.
__________________
"A machine you build yourself is a vote for a different way of life. There are things you have to earn with your hands." |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
That's an interesting problem. I thought about something like that for the back of my 930 which pretty much has no bumper right now unless you count a fiberglass bumper cover with a big turbo crush zone.
I could model something and run a finite element analysis to see how it would deform but my software may not accurately represent actual crash buckling.
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Model Citizen
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Voodoo Lounge
Posts: 18,811
|
Do you even need to create a crush zone in the tube? Won't the tubes be the path of least resistance by their very aluminum nature? (Assuming you will use all of the original mounting points with similar brackets)
How about a slot (about a quarter inch wide) running the length of the tube at the bottom to create an area for the tube to expand in case of impact? Or 4 horizontal slots. I always thought an elegant solution to the bumper shock dilemma would be many pieces of thin solid aluminum rod welded together in multiple triangles. Think of stage light rigging, but on a much smaller scale. Light, strong, capable of withstanding stresses in many planes, and could also be engineered with a crush zone to save the tub. Probably too labor intensive to be practical. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,037
|
My thought is that you are over-thinking this. I see no point in creating a crush zone.
In a light impact, like in a parking lot, any crush ruins the tube. Need a new one anyway, so what have you gained? In a big wreck, the chances of the forces being in line with your tube are minimal, so your tube is likely to bend anyway. You will also need a new tube. What have you gained? JR |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,270
|
Good thoughts and questions, thanks. here is a little more detail on my thought process.
Front shocks are 4,6 oz each. Rears are 4,13 oz each, so about 19 lb total weight. My goal is a 1 lb/mount for a total 15 lb weight savings at the ends of the car. But I also want to stay as close to stock bumper dampening in light hits while not damaging the unibody in harder hits. Basically, like the shocks, I want transmit as little energy from an accident directly to the unibody in light, medium or hard hit situations. They just look heavy. ![]()
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,270
|
Quote:
Your stage light rigging would be a very cool and very light idea but probably not practical to make. I was also thinking of a series of horizontal cuts around the tube using a miter saw so they would just collapse on impact.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,270
|
Quote:
Modeling something would be great! Sending you an email.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,037
|
Okay, in anything other than the lightest of love taps, your aluminum tubes are going to fail. So, minor bumps will require replacement of the tubes. The forces transmitted to the tub will likely be less than those that would have been transmitted by the stock shocks, as they have less strength than the stock ones. It takes pretty decent hit to move those.
In a big impact, the damage to the tub won't come from forces transmitted though the tube. The forces will be high enough that the tube will fail and the bumper will soon be pushed into the tub. It's the bumper that's going to do the damage, assuming whatever hits you doesn't just go right over it and directly into your hood and fenders. Look at any 911 that's had a front impact, epecially those that are offset on one side. There's a fair bit of damage. JR |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,270
|
Failure of the tubes is a given.
Controlling the failure and how it impacts (no pun intended) the tub, is my goal.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design Last edited by Shaun 84 Targa; 07-22-2015 at 05:53 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Woodlands TX
Posts: 3,937
|
I agree the energy absorption is going to have negligible effect in the context of saving the chassis. Just regular aluminum should do what you want.
OTH if you want to make them weak enough that they cant transfer too much force to the bumpers, which could be useful for saving bumpers in parking lot incidences, you could do alternating milling pattern on either side of the tube. It would sorta turn the tube in an S shape when viewed from the top. This will ensure the tube bucles right away and will use the whole length for deformation. I are an engineer, but this isn't really my area, so grain of salt and all that
__________________
84 930 07 Exige S |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lawrenceville GA 30045
Posts: 7,377
|
If making something from scratch - start with the flexible exhaust pipe - but stretch (lengthen) it prior to attaching end plates for mounting surfaces.
__________________
Mark '83 SC Targa - since 5/5/2001 '06 911 S Aerokit - from 5/2/2016 to 11/14/2018 '11 911 S w/PDK - from 7/2/2021 to ??? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,037
|
Quote:
The point I'm trying to make is that they are largely irrelevant. JR |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,646
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Here's from a 928... Stolen from xchop's build on rennslist |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
^ ha! --not an engineered solution
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,646
|
Eh practical solution.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,270
|
Quote:
I get your point JR. It only takes one time. I simply want to plan for that one time and it's a worthwhile goal of reducing impact on the tub. And it makes for a lighter part, so that's a benefit as well.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|