Crazy weather in the North Atlantic - +50F above 'normal' at the North Pole!

[tadink]

Not sure if anyone is tracking this - but here is a story about the crazy storm that caused the Tornados in Dallas, and is now bearing down on the UK.

Likely to be one of the strongest storms on record - with very odd repercussions for the arctic, and in particular the North Pole.

The Climate is changing lads - hang on!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/12/28/freak-storm-in-north-atlantic-may-push-temperatures-70-degrees-above-normal-at-north-pole/?postshare=8661451510077929&tid=ss_fb-bottom

[Bob Kontak]

Originally Posted by tadink

The Climate is changing lads - hang on!

Not buying that. Had icicles hanging off my nads in May, 18 months ago.

It's freaky, but one year does not make a trend.

[DanielDudley]

Originally Posted by Bob Kontak

Not buying that. Had icicles hanging off my nads in May, 18 months ago.

You should take something for that. I recommend Bourbon. It's got antifreeze in it.



Interesting link none the less.

[Don Ro]

"The Climate is changing lads - hang on!"
.
OMG.
We're all Doomed!!!
Free sex for everyone.

[Tobra]

This guy seems to think this stuff is being done in an active fashion. He makes some pretty persuasive, fairly well supported arguments.

[M.D. Holloway]

Originally Posted by Tobra

This guy seems to think this stuff is being done in an active fashion. He makes some pretty persuasive, fairly well supported arguments.

We analyze a lot of av fuel and let me tell you first hand, if someone is putting something sinister in the fuel it ain't showing up in any of our analysis. And yes, the fuel is put through a GC that will ID any organic compounds and it is put through an ICP to ID any metallic compounds.

In order to get the volume of particulate into the air would require a heck of a delivery system better than a jet engine. If I was to do it I would just burn it in a Co-Gen plant. The volumes could be hidden and the delivery would be the smoke stacks - no one would be the wiser.

[gtc]

Well you see, THEY are probably using chemistry so advanced that the metals and organic compounds are actually created in a combustion process possible only inside a turbofan engine!

Originally Posted by M.D. Holloway

We analyze a lot of av fuel and let me tell you first hand, if someone is putting something sinister in the fuel it ain't showing up in any of our analysis. And yes, the fuel is put through a GC that will ID any organic compounds and it is put through an ICP to ID any metallic compounds.

In order to get the volume of particulate into the air would require a heck of a delivery system better than a jet engine. If I was to do it I would just burn it in a Co-Gen plant. The volumes could be hidden and the delivery would be the smoke stacks - no one would be the wiser.

[Tobra]

It is not in the fuel. The idea is that they are spraying it. Problem with a stationary plant is dispersal.

[onewhippedpuppy]

Originally Posted by Tobra

This guy seems to think this stuff is being done in an active fashion. He makes some pretty persuasive, fairly well supported arguments.

From someone that works in aerospace......LOL.

[speeder]

I like it when people start talking about chemtrails. Usually it's a homeless guy with a shopping cart full of spaceship parts but whatever.

I always ask them the same question: If the government/tri-lateral committee/Martians/etc. are really running some massive conspiracy like that, why are they only informing a few people in mental hospitals and freeway ramps? Doesn't make sense.

[jyl]

Originally Posted by Tobra

This guy seems to think this stuff is being done in an active fashion. He makes some pretty persuasive, fairly well supported arguments.

Does his analysis include numbers?. What volume of whatever chemicals would have to be dispersed, what is the market cost of those chemicals and the dispersal system, etc.

I can't find the time to hunt through that whole page. A video of airplanes leaving contrails didn't really cut it.