![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thanks for the great story Paul/Seahawk. I remember the documentary showing Castro in a missile placement back in the '60's. A US aircraft flies over Cuba and Castro says shoot it down. I don't think this world needs this kind of action again.
How far was this ship from the Baltic Coast? I am sure if there was a Russian ship anywhere close to North America they would get the same buzz job treatment. Cooler heads prevail.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday the U.S. Navy ship that was buzzed by two Russian warplanes in the Baltic Sea this week could have opened fire under U.S. military rules of engagement.
The USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) was conducting flight operations with a Polish helicopter Monday when two Russian Su-24 attack aircraft came within 1,000 yards of the destroyer, flying just 100 feet off the ground. The following day, a Russian jet came within 30 feet of the destroyer. A U.S. defense official described the maneuvers to Fox News as a "simulated attack profile." "We condemn this kind of behavior. It is reckless. It is provocative. It is dangerous. And under the rules of engagement that could have been a shoot-down," Kerry told CNN Espanol in Miami Thursday. In all cases, a military commander has the authority to defend his or her ship, plane or other unit. The commander is expected to use his or her best judgment under the circumstances to determine whether the ship faces an imminent threat. "People need to understand that this is serious business and the United States is not going to be intimidated on the high seas," Kerry added. "We are communicating to the Russians how dangerous this is and our hope is that this will never be repeated." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cool story. I was on the Kidd. "Monkey monkey monkey!!!" |
Quote:
Nice ship. During the Persian Gulf War I flew with the Desert Ducks once a week or so but don't recall if I landed on the Kidd. |
Did you fly a cobra?
|
Quote:
Oh, the irony, this spammer is probably a rooskie. Only work available in Russia is being a spambot on U.S. forums. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Clearly they should have destroyed the airfield with cruise missiles before they left port so they wouldn't be in this situation. :rolleyes: |
|
Sometimes they aren't so good at flying close.
http://theaviationist.com/2016/04/14/that-time-a-soviet-bomber-crashed-into-the-sea-after-buzzing-a-u-s-aircraft-carrier/ <iframe width="716" height="428" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/l3bijF2--os" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
I'd really like to see what happens @ :47
Quote:
|
How many different ways does a destroyer have to shot down a threat? Plus they can track many dozens of targets and shoot multiple targets at once. When traveling with a carrier a destroyer or missile cruiser is capable of providing the air traffic control duties. They carry multiple types of missiles as well as the very nasty Phalanx CIWS. At close range the Phalanx would shred the jets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0ZAGOuaqg |
You ever run over an aluminum can with a lawnmower?
That is how I imagine a jet would look if it tangled with a Phalanx system. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website