![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,823
|
Quote:
Watch this video, or at least starting at about 1:30. It's a video using a UV sensitive camera. (and it's an interesting video).
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,258
|
That's interesting but it doesn't distinguish between UVA and UVB. My understanding is glass blocks UVB but not UVA. Most UV light reaching us is UVA. And magazines in the same window are faded, so there's that.
But I'll tape my test to the outside of the window for fun.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Did you get the memo?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 32,270
|
Probably depends on the glass as well. If it's an old school single pane window with just plain glass, that won't offer much UV resistance. If it's a modern double pane glass filled window, it's going to block a lot.
__________________
‘07 Mazda RX8-8 Past: 911T, 911SC, Carrera, 951s, 955, 996s, 987s, 986s, 997s, BMW 5x, C36, C63, XJR, S8, Maserati Coupe, GT500, etc |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,258
|
Yeah, modern glass is designed to protect against UV. The glass in the building is definitely not modern.
![]()
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Control Group
|
Maybe drill a hole in it and hang it on a wire instead of tape. You want it to be there when you come back.
Magazine ink is probably not going to be very durable, WRT to photoresistance, even if most of the UV is blocked. If you look closely at those old windows, they will be a little thinner at the top than they are on the bottom, due to the glass flowing a bit.
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
![]() |
|