|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
question, which is better and why, hollow or solid torsion bars?
I need to buy new t-bars, car has 23mm and that is too big. I will be replacing w/ 21mm. I hear that the hollow ones offer better response.
Thoughts?
__________________
-Jay '74 Mexico Blue 911 3.0 EFI (Fast and Loud) '70 914/6 Race Car (Faster and Louder) '71 73RSR tribute vintage race car 3.0 '68 SWB 911T "RENNRAT" 2.8 twin plug/915 gearbox '81 Magenta IROC clone in progress 3.6 varioram/G50 |
||
|
|
|
|
Now in 993 land ...
|
I think the advantage of the hollow ones is saving you weight. If you think about the torsion taking place, the center of the bar does not get 'twisted' much and hardly has an effect on the spring rate. The outer diameter material is where the torsion takes place. That is why you can hollow the bars in the first place. E.g. weltmeister sells a 22.5mm bar being equal to a solid 22mm. Half a mm more material on the outside for a huge bunch of material missing in the center!
I am curious on what others have to say about different response. As far as I am concerned a spring is a spring and if the rates are identical, their behaviour on the road should be identical. Cheers, George |
||
|
|
|
|
Navin Johnson
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wantagh, NY
Posts: 8,818
|
Aigel pretty much explains it, the material in the center of the bar is pretty much along for the ride, contributing little ( none in the center) to the spring rate of the bar.
Hollow bars save weight, but you pay more for them because someone has to remove the material from the center, "gun drilled" etc.. its an extra manufacturing step.
__________________
Don't feed the trolls. Don't quote the trolls ![]() http://www.southshoreperformanceny.com '69 911 GT-5 '75 914 GT-3 and others |
||
|
|
|
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,334
|
I think the only real advantage is weight savings, of course thats not only sprung weight, but also some unsprung weight, but it still amounts to weight-loss.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Waht's the weight difference?
__________________
.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: gatlinburg tn
Posts: 752
|
the transient response might be better in therory.
__________________
72 911t grey/black mine 74 914 2.0 black/ tan hers 02 g500 black/black womanproof 01 f250 psd dirty the mule 60 correct craft starflite cool 69 correct craft torino hauls butt 72 correct craft ski nautique fun 66 vw 1500s will finish someday |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Writer/DP
|
Main advantage is weight loss (the unsprung part). I'm not an engineer and cannot explain why, but the ride quality (comfort over expansion joints, etc.) is also better with hollow torsion bars over equivalent solid ones.
__________________
1972 S - Early S Registry #187 1972 T/ST - R Gruppe #51 http://randywells.com http://randywells.com/blog |
||
|
|
|