![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Wideband sensor plug too large
Got a wideband sensor and an AFR gauge for my 84 Targa
In the process of installing the sensor wire and found that the plug is too large for the hole that's in the engine tin. Anybody else run into this and have a good solution or ideas before I start cutting the engine tin. The sensor is about 1" dia so that may be the easier way to go, just need enlarge the hole if I go that way ![]() Last edited by eflight; 05-11-2025 at 09:25 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I would try to de-pin the connector, run the wire thru and put the pins back in the same locations.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grapevine, TX
Posts: 1,106
|
You'll probably be a lot close passing the sensor through the hole as opposed to the connector. It still won't quite fit but is pretty close. On my previous 928 I filed the round hoe into a hex that matched that on the sensor. The factory grommet had a large enough lip that it still fully covers the hex shaped hole.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,750
|
I think it is best to make the hole in the tin larger.
If you do that, you may be able to buy or make a grommet for that hole if you are concerned about heat, debris or whatever.
__________________
Mike PCA Golden Gate Region Porsche Racing Club #4 BMWCCA NASA Last edited by Mahler9th; 05-11-2025 at 04:54 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Quote:
Most modern terminals lock into the connector body like this: ![]() There are many tools to de-pin connectors. Some generic, some for specific connector/terminals. A trivial task with the correct tool. This is the connector kit for a Bosch 4.9 wideband (the 4.2 wideband has the same terminals - but the connector body is deliberately different/incompatible, so you can't mix them up - as they require different controller circuits). Hard to tell what exactly the terminals are, but given the Bosch origin, I'd lean towards thinking they're some variation of TE Superseal - there's at least 3. The terminals look similar to GM/Delphi Weatherpack, but are supposedly different (Weatherpack/Superseal connector bodies don't look similar at all). ![]() These are female terminals, (and facing in the wrong orientation in the picture, the weather seals are supposed to be crimped into the wide part of the connector to seal the hole in the connector body) - Note the tang, or barb, on the right side of the terminal. You release the barb from the front with the tool, and then pull the wire back through the back of the connector housing. It may help to push the wire from the back to reduce any loading on the barb/make sure it's got room to move out of the way, "Assembly is the reverse of disassembly", as all the best manuals say, LOL. You can often feel a positive "click" as the barb locates into the body. Although the wire not pushing back through the connector body is also good enough.
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 14,253
|
Loosen the tin (or lower the engine) and run the wire between the tin and the engine seal. No need to modify the tin. Thats what I did with my 930.
Last edited by A930Rocket; 05-13-2025 at 06:43 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2025
Posts: 8
|
Just make sure to clean up the edges and maybe add a grommet to keep the wire from chafing.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 261
|
The sensor fits through the hole. The connector does not.
__________________
North Idaho CDA / Spokane area Instagram: to.performance MoTeC USA Authorized Dealer Porsche 959 Department Manager at Canepa *retired after 10 years* Website / Webstore https://www.topperformancetuning.com/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,750
|
Many or uego devices use sensors that have a built in trim resistor. If this is the case, instructions usually caution folks about altering the harness to which the sensor connector is attached. If you cut and splice in wires to extend the length of this harness, you may compromise the accuracy of the readings.
So if you feed the sensor through the tin, and there is not enough harness length to get the sensor into the bung, it may not be a good idea to lengthen that harness.
__________________
Mike PCA Golden Gate Region Porsche Racing Club #4 BMWCCA NASA |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Quote:
All the Bosch wideband sensors incorporate an internal resistor pack laser-trimmed at the factory. If you buy a Bosch wideband from MoTeC, they helpfully etch the initial value on the body of the sensor. A MoTeC allows you to perform a free air calibration to measure the current value of a not-new sensor. Which you need to do periodically to compensate for the value of the sensor varying as it ages and/or accumulates contaminates. Any system that doesn't allow you to re-calibrate the sensor doesn't seem like it would be fit for purpose to me. You can actually measure this value with a DMM between a couple of pins on the connector (1 & 6 on my 4.9), multiply by 10 and arrive at the same value as the value the MoTeC reports from the free air calibration step. Does for me, anyway. Quote:
What Bosch are actually concerned about is that owners don't solder the crimp and/or heat shrink the wire harness. The Nernst cell doesn't/can't work without a source of reference air - and in the Bosch design, no port is provided on the sensor body itself. Because they judged that it would be too vulnerable to being clogged with road crud. So, in the Bosch wideband, the ion pump pulls the reference air it needs down the strands of the wire in the harness. Many folks have expressed skepticism about this fact, despite it being called out in almost every Bosch tech document - for example, Bosch LSU 4.2 Tech Doc Y 258 K01 005-000e Mar 2001 contains this text: Quote:
Quote:
NTK also make wideband sensors - but I've no idea how they arrange for the reference air flow, as I only buy Bosch...
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Where are you installing the actual gauge? Somewhere in the cockpit? If so you do not need to go up into the engine bay. If it's a 84-89 Carrera you should route wiring along side the main engine harness that enters the cabin below the rear driver's side jump seat.
What WB02 Gauge did you purchase? More details please.
__________________
Sal 1984 911 Carrera Cab M491 (Factory Wide Body) 1975 911S Targa (SOLD) 1964 356SC (SOLD) 1987 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 Convertible |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Thanks all for the inputs
Sensor is the AEM 30-4110 No the sensor does not fit through the hole as it is. I broke out the trusty step dill and opened it up just enough to slide the sensor through the larger hole. A little RTV using the old grommet from the old O2 sensor and its done. I did run the AFR wire out the front of the engine bay and down into the grommet in the floor pan behind the drivers seat. Also ran a spare wire in case I wanted to use the O2 sensor emulation from the gauge. Getting that grommet back in place afterwards was all kinds of fun. I ran a 12V line from the fuse panel. It all got put in a mount on the center console that I printed out. New panel has a voltmeter, USB socket and switch for the antenna so I can have it stay down if just listening to the music on the thumb drive. The good news is that it all worked. The bad news is that it worked for all of about 20 seconds. I took a picture of it after I backed out of the garage. As I pulled out of the driveway it went to 3 dashed red lines and stayed that way. Turned off the car, restarted it, goes through its calibration sequence and then 3 dashed lines. Called AEM, they are sending me a test procedure to figure out whats wrong. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,750
|
As I have posted in other threads, it can be important to be careful about oxygen sensors for AEM and other products.
A bunch of us used AEMs for many years in racing apps using 110 leaded. The sensors lasted a long time for quite a few years... but then things changed. And I bought an AEM "compatible" sensor or two from Amazon and/or Ebay back in the day with poor results. I still have several AEM sensors that are like new if you want them for trouble shooting. Our "herd" switched to the Ballenger AFR 500. We always compared to an old Motec "gold standard" from back in the high days of IMSA. Again application = racing and running open loop and leaded fuel. Great company and products. I have been to the NGK/NTK silly con valley office in SJ. Great people preparing for a different future.
__________________
Mike PCA Golden Gate Region Porsche Racing Club #4 BMWCCA NASA |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Talked to the rep at AEM today. They have 3 tests to do before they can determine what's wrong with AFR system.
Did test 1. Run positive and neg wires directly from gage input wires to battery. I did that and the AFR System starts up and within 10 seconds is showing full lean. thats with the engine off. Test 2 is to see if sensor heats up, which means jacking up the car, taking off the wheel and pulling the sensor. Test 3 is gas rag for a sniff test on the sensor after test 2. Looks like lots of rain this week so it will get done when I cant do anything else |
||
![]() |
|