![]() |
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Travelers Rest, South Carolina
Posts: 8,795
|
Re: 8X16 Part# vs Dimensions Confusion - HELP!
Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by fastpat; 04-26-2005 at 09:29 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Pre Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Out of kindness, I suppose.
Posts: 1,826
|
Quote:
Tim |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 1,798
|
Tim:
Porsche colour, right? Thanks, J.P. |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Re: Re: 8X16 Part# vs Dimensions Confusion - HELP!
Quote:
There's a difference between the 361 wheels and the later superceding 362 wheels. I've compared 16x6, 16x7 wheels and found some differences in shape of the petals, dimensions, etc. I imagine the Fuchs company improved on their forgings over the years and thus had to update the part numbers for Porsche? Just a guess on my part. As far as the price you got? Shop around. I've seen dealers that can knock a good chunk of change (more than $100) off the price you were quoted. And that was for a 16x9 911 362 119 00 wheel. But as Bill Verburg keeps saying, Fuchs prices like these make wheels like Kinesis, Fikse, etc. look more and more like the way to go! Especially since 17 in. tires are more readily available in the size, brand one may desire.
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" Last edited by KTL; 04-27-2005 at 07:17 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Pre Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Out of kindness, I suppose.
Posts: 1,826
|
Quote:
Right. Factory painted centers, factory paint code. Tim |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I was speculating to myself that there could be differences in brake clearance on the inside, your pics of the centers seems to suggest that may be true. Prime opportunity to feed Bill's wheel database!
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
![]()
Don & KTL, excellent posts and photos! (I love this kind of stuff)
I recently digitized a 7" (for a CAD model) So, I certainly was getting into thte sublties of the design/shape. FWIW, the later seem to have gotten a bit more sophisticated, using C2 curvature (rather than the simpler C1 - simple round) on the end of the spoke. (if that means anything to anyone) I imagine that subtle change helps the tooling last a bit longer, as well as simply giving a better shape. Coo-stuff - Thanks.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Ha!
We get a guy with some metallurgy background and things really get interesting! Thanks Glenn. My "improved on their forgings" comment was simply a wild assumption. ![]()
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
I found the same thing that Bill did in that some of the backspace numbers don't jibe.....it sometimes comes down to whether ( or not) the thickness of the rim forging itself is taken into account as part of the backspace measurement.....or if its taken from some imaginary "seating surface" the tire rides-on within the rim.
I've posted similar data as Bill's on the Rennlist web site with posted credits from *where* the info came from too. It may even be reposted within this BBS. Wil
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) |
||
![]() |
|