![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 3,336
|
Why not got 9" wheels all around on a Caarrera?
Just curious since I see so many people going with 9's in the front and 11's in the rear.
__________________
85 911 SuperSport No more looking! The jewel is mine! 89 Jeep Wrangler A jewel in the rough 2000 Grand Cherokee Family Wagon with Jewels on board |
||
![]() |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,334
|
Because there's more weight to control in the back.
__________________
Jack Olsen 1972 911 My new video about my garage. • A video from German TV about my 911 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 3,336
|
Wouldnt it be concidered an upgrade to the front though?
__________________
85 911 SuperSport No more looking! The jewel is mine! 89 Jeep Wrangler A jewel in the rough 2000 Grand Cherokee Family Wagon with Jewels on board |
||
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bigger ain't always better.
|
||
![]() |
|
Light,Nimble,Uncivilized
|
Quote:
__________________
Drago '69 Coupe R #464 |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
First the only Carrera that can fit a 9 in the front is a widybody. So that lets out most of them
Second, if you want to A/X and desire a lot of oversteer it might be a good idea Third, for street, looks are big, 9s would look odd w/o the big spacers the factory uses. They wil look odd anyway w/ the same sizex f/r fourth, for track use a 911 has oversteer at speed, this needs to be tamed, a bigger rear is a very good way to do that. all street 911s untill the '73 RS used the same size all around, as they became more powerfull the oversteer at speed became more of a problem, so all the higher power cars since '73 have used bigger wheels and tires in the back.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
It's all about balance.
60% of the weight is in the rear, you need 60% of the traction in the rear for a balanced neutral car. Obviously the car's handling is affected by weight transfer, but the point still remains. Then there's the fact that the rear fenders on a carrera are designed for wider tires and wheels than the front.............. you couldn't fit 9" on the front and if you had the same size on the front as the back it wouldn't look right or handle right. The very early cars got away with having the same size tires front and back to some extent because they were much lighter. 7's in the front is about the most you can fit, you can get 8's in the back easily, and 9's if the offset and tire size is right. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 3,336
|
Quote:
I do some track days up at willow and a couple A/X also- I understand why they use large wheels in the rear (I have seen a few spins) however I don't understand why not increase the fronts to the same size? Would this "Increase" my car's tendency to spin?
__________________
85 911 SuperSport No more looking! The jewel is mine! 89 Jeep Wrangler A jewel in the rough 2000 Grand Cherokee Family Wagon with Jewels on board |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
likes to left foot brake.
|
I had success with 9 inch wide, 23 inch tall cantilevers slicks all the way around.
Adjust sway bars to suit. Great short track set up IMHO. Lower CG, lower final drive ratio, lower lap times and greater slip angels = fun. Saved me 2 seconds a lap over Victoracers. Everyday in the rain or on big tracks, nah. ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|