![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carnation, Wa
Posts: 202
|
Brakes Again
The car is a 1980 sc, which is getting slowly lighter. So far deleted aircon, wevo battery box, ditched spare, tools, and jack. Nothing too radical yet, but headed in the right direction.
So in reading Teo's thread, some people stated that they were thinking about reverting to the SC brakes... If the SC brakes are being deemed acceptable then are the Boxster monoblocks being viewed as more than a cosmetic upgrade these days? Here is my thinking: My calipers will need rebuilding the next time I do pads. Would I not do better to switch to lighter calipers, that do not transfer heat as effectively, offer more pad area, and apply pressure more evenly, while getting slightly larger rotors?
__________________
Matt West 1980 911 SC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
There are a wide variety of opinions on brakes. If you are not racing then your SC brakes may be enough. Ducting air to the fronts will help alot with keeping the calipers from leaking and keeping the fluid from boiling. What makes you think the fronts need rebuilding? My Carrera calipers on my race car have never been rebuilt and they have 5 seasons of racing and are 19 years old. I've seen lots of people have problems after rebuiding calipers with the new seals failing.
-Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
rotors are the component to concentrate on, anything that keeps rotor temps down is the goal. Some things that are steps in the right direction
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
Upgrade the calipers for show - the rotors for true stopping power and heat disapation.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: South NJ
Posts: 2,516
|
The Boxster upgrade is an upgrade in your case because it brings 24mm rotors compared to your 20mm.
You could get the same benefit by using carrera rotors and calipers, though the Boxster calipers are lighter than the carreras. What do you plan for the rear? Have you calculated bias?
__________________
Todd Doing business with leebparts? http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-used-parts-sale-wanted/555068-attn-leebparts-please-contact-me.html |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 690
|
__________________
1982 Porsche 911SC Coupe - Factory Short Shift |7:31 R&P in AL case | Toyo RA1 Tires | Corbeau TRS seats | M&K 2 in 2 out muffler |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,486
|
Carrera Brakes will let you move up to the 24mm Rotors, that is all you need
__________________
Derek Oxford PCA - Nationally Certified Instructor 2002 Boxster S ( race car) 2010 LR4 2009 GMC Sierra (Porsche Support 2011 M3 4Door |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,335
|
Here's what I doing. Hopefully it'll be enough for the thin air and hot track temps we get.
This is a relatively inexpensive upgrade over the '72 S calipers and stock 20mm rotors that I have. My biggest issue with my current brake setup is the spongy feel of the S calipers. I have a DE next week where I'll probably know for sure if I'm running out of brake with my 20mm rotors. There are two keys for my application. 1) Increase thermal reserve without a drastic increase in the weight of the brake package. There's no need to put 'bling' brakes on a lightweight car. 2) Fit in 15" wheels. The vintage racing class I'm building for allows a maximum of 15x8 rims.
__________________
- '72 911T - '81 911SC Euro |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Josh, the sponginess you feel is in all likelyhood the caliper flexing, the Carrera calipers will fix that.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
While I agree pretty much with the tech analysis already given, I think if faced with the choice of new 3.2 calipers or Boxster calipers (both over 24mm rotors) I would be sorely tempted to go Boxster. Sure its a little bling, but you do get the lighter, stiffer caliper with bigger pads. Since changing to 964 front brakes on my 3.2 the pads last close to 3 times as long. I also think the 3.2 calipers flex pretty much like the SC calipers.
There are also a number of 3.2 owners (particularly a couple of CSs) who swear that the Boxster caliper alone over std rotors has made a quantifiable difference to both measured braking distances and rotor temps. These are either serious track junkies or racers (the two CS guys anyhow). The science says otherwise but some of the anecdotal evidence is actually pretty compelling. HTH Richard |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
No one ever said that there is much difference between wide A and Boxster calipers on the 24mm rotors, the caliper may be stiffer(that is debatable as well but we'll leave that) but the extra adaptor allows for some additional flex as well. the only knock was the relative cost of the 2 duifferent setups. i.e. bang for the buck
Yes, an advantage of a bigger pad is to spread the thermal an mechanical loads over a larger area, this does reduce the mech. and thrm. point loads and extends the life of that component. At the expense of increased rotor wear(again a little) It does not and cannot increase the brake torque except to the extent that the piston area is slightly(but not much,) different Quote:
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|