|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
How much power is 1lb of boost worth?
I recently made some changes to my setup and now it seems as though i am boosting at slightly lower levels (9 instead of 11 psi).
Does anyone know what the relationship is between 1psi and horsepower?
__________________
1987 930 1956 Chevy 3100 2009 Subaru Forester 2003 KX250 X2(I like my toys!!) |
||
|
|
|
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
Too many variables, but you can make an estimate with enough information like displacement, intercooler efficiency at both pressures, turbo efficiency at both pressures, back pressure, etc.
My guess (not knowing your set up) would be about 15 hp per lb. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
It's a stock car with ghl headers and exhaust... nothing else is changed.
Thanks for the estimate though.. gives me a general idea.
__________________
1987 930 1956 Chevy 3100 2009 Subaru Forester 2003 KX250 X2(I like my toys!!) Last edited by mark '87 930; 07-04-2006 at 01:35 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Automotive Monomaniac
|
Interesting.
So, stock 930 boost is about .8 bar (11.76 psi at sea level). My aftermarket spring brought it up to 1.0 bar (14.7 psi at sea level). That means it was good for about 45 horsepower over stock (under optimal conditions)? Too bad I chose longevity and put my stock spring back in...
__________________
2018 - Porsche 911 Carrera 7MT / 2018 - Porsche Macan 7DCT / 1993 - Cadillac Allante / 2023 - RAM TRX (on order) |
||
|
|
|
|
Detached Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
|
1 Bar=14.7 psi. So 1 lb is 1/14.7 or about 7% increase max.
__________________
Hugh |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,668
|
Actually I think it is 1 / (14.7 * 2) ~ 3.5% max.
Remember the 1 bar boost augments 1 bar atmospheric.
__________________
Chuck Moreland - elephantracing.com - vonnen.com |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
Nice catch Chuck. Is that curve/line actually linear given the design restrictions?
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
|
|
|
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
That is assuming that an engine running at atmospheric pressure (normally aspirated) is 100% volumetrically efficient.
I've turbocharged 3 different engines that started out as normally aspirated and every time I found that the best part of adding positive intake manifold pressure is the engine does not run out of breath at 5000 rpm, it continues to breath very well all the way to redline. I had a stock 2 liter type 4 in a 914 that wouldn't pull much past 5200 rpm. When I added a turbo, it pulled until the valves floated (around 6500) without a hint of falling off. My stock SC engine pulls stronger and stronger to 7000. That's when I chicken out and shift before i break something. Before the turbo it fell on it's face at 5600. In fact, I would venture to say that the first pound of pressure makes the most difference and it tapers off gradually from there. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kihei, HI - Maui
Posts: 593
|
There's an old saying in the forced induction world: "It's flow, not boost." If you've done things like add efficient headers, port/polish the intake or increased the size of the throttle body you may see boost levels drop and power go up. Essentially boost levels are back pressure. If you open up the system to flow more air, you'll see the boost level go down but the power rise
__________________
07 Audi A4 2.0T Cabriolet - Black/Black (sold) 96 993 C2 Cabriolet - Arena Red/Tan (sold) 82 911SC - 993 Turbo Cab Trib - Speed Yellow/Black (sold) 58 DKW Universal - Baby Crap Yellow/Beige (sold) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
mark '87 930
just for fun and giggles, try this calculator: http://www.csgnetwork.com/blowerhpcalc.html
__________________
Kuehl 1987 911 cab, modified https://griffiths.com/ |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 390
|
If you were not flow limited, the increase in power would be linear, because the power would be proportional to the amount of air you can fit into a cylinder, which is proportional to the pressure. At sealevel, the ratio to normally aspirated would be (14.7+1)/14.7=1.07, 7% increase, as pointed out by Hugh.
An interesting number to remember is that the energy content of a stochiometric gas/air mixture is about 20 hp/1000rpm/liter for atnospheric pressure. This doesn't take into account the Carnot (thermal) efficiency of the engine, which is approximately 1-R^-0.4, where R is the compression ratio. This is 0.6 for a compression ratio of 10:1. So ideally, you can make about 12 hp/1000rpm/liter for a normally aspirated engine. Of course, flow limitations keep the power from increaing linearly with engine speed. To the engine, it looks like atmospheric pressure drops as engine speed increases at high RPMs due to flow impedance in the intake and exhaust. Turbos help in two ways. First, they effectively increase the atmospheric pressure, and the power is proportional to this. Second, as pointed out by Mike, and maybe more important, they help you with flow limitations. Turbos usually reduce the CR to reduce stress on the engine (and maybe to prevent detonation, anyone know?), but since the you are only losing as R^-0.4, instead of linear, it is a net gain.
__________________
Scott Wilburn 1988 911 Carrera 3.4 L 1998 M3 1984 308 QV |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,477
|
Based on several dyno trips and well tuned car with well set-up breathing (exhaust flow is a big factor).
1psi = approx. 8-10hp Yasin
__________________
Ole Skool - wouldn't have it any other way |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Detached Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
|
Quote:
__________________
Hugh |
||
|
|
|
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
Here's a few turbo calculators I have played with in the past. They are good but they require accurate information input to provide accurate output.
http://www.turbofast.com.au/javacalc.html |
||
|
|
|
|
Slumlord
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,983
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
Based on some assumptions like 80% VE, 40% intercooler efficiency, 55% turbo efficiency, I get a 17hp drop going from 11 to 9 psi boost.
Of course those numbers i put in are guesses and are very conservative. With a more effcient intercooler, a more efficient turbo, and a better VE the hp per lb will go up a great deal. As an interesting side note, gonig from -1 psi (NA) to +1 psi gives an increase of 21 hp. |
||
|
|
|
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
On a car with moderate modifications, .1 bar usually equals 20 hp.
All else being equal, etc blah blah
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
|
|
|