Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego, CA (La Mesa)
Posts: 574
Garage
I was looking at the Supertec website. I saw what they have to offer and I woudl like to rebuild it myself. I was thinking about buying a 3.6 and rebuilding it while my 3.0 is still runnig fine and then when done dropping it in.

I guess I'm looking for somethign with some grunt....maybe tire smoking power. The 3.0 right now is definately weak.

__________________
Currently own:
1980 911SC slantnose
1991 Honda Accord -daily driver (1991 Honda Accord #2 - just because)
2003 Acura TL Type-S (2006 Honda Odyssey w/ DVD)

Gone but missed:
1988 Mazda RX-7 Turbo II (1991 Jeep Wrangler Renegade)
1984 Jeep CJ-7 (1994 Chevy Blazer)
1987 Chevy Corvette (1996 Mustang Cobra)
1993 Jeep Wrangler (1995 Mustang GT Conv.)
2003 Ford Explorer Sport Trac (1987 BMW M6)


Future: Hopefully not too far off
Ferrari Testarossa (Lamboghini Diablo or Countach)
Detomaso Pantera
Old 11-30-2006, 05:43 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #21 (permalink)
Registered
 
phaques's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 219
Well, since some of you are getting carried away, I'd like to suggest a more non-traditional mod: installation of a General Electric T58-8F. See photo of a 2002 VW Beetle to get an idea of the potential.

Good for about 1350hp. Redlines at 26,000rpm. not sure how the smog test would go.... And, it's simple! Engine only has three gears: Cool, Big-Fire, and Afterburner!

Check out the whole photo gallery and story at http://www.ronpatrickstuff.com/

Anyway, sorry to get off track, but i couldn't resist.

Don't think I'd want to be anywhere behind this guy on the track when he shifts into "Afterburner".
__________________
Fax

1983 Porsche 911SC
Old 11-30-2006, 05:47 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #22 (permalink)
Registered
 
joetiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 1,218
Garage
Quote:
Originally posted by Lukesportsman
Joe,

You need bigger better camshafts to gain the top end charge. Stock 3.0 CIS cams are too small to exploit the PMO's for me. Remember, until you get rid of CIS pistons your still quite restricted...might think Webcam 20/21's. My 9.3:1 3.0 dyno'd at 231. You could/should also recurve the dizzy for the carbs and cams. I don't have my torque figures in hand, but not much better than yours, just more area under the curve due to more reach.

What size PMO's?



I figured I'd need a bigger cam. What size?
I don't want to give up much torque.

I have PMOs w/ 40s now. Real nice throttle response. Being at 9.3:1 now, I figure a 9.8:1 squeeze or higher would make a difference and with a Electromotive distributorless HO ignition. How high or an RPM can be run with theses larger valves?

BTW, whats a dizzy?
__________________
joe
------------------
'69 911 E Targa - aka "RoxiE"
Old 11-30-2006, 05:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #23 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego, CA (La Mesa)
Posts: 574
Garage
Maybe I should just sell the Porsche an buy a Pantera.
__________________
Currently own:
1980 911SC slantnose
1991 Honda Accord -daily driver (1991 Honda Accord #2 - just because)
2003 Acura TL Type-S (2006 Honda Odyssey w/ DVD)

Gone but missed:
1988 Mazda RX-7 Turbo II (1991 Jeep Wrangler Renegade)
1984 Jeep CJ-7 (1994 Chevy Blazer)
1987 Chevy Corvette (1996 Mustang Cobra)
1993 Jeep Wrangler (1995 Mustang GT Conv.)
2003 Ford Explorer Sport Trac (1987 BMW M6)


Future: Hopefully not too far off
Ferrari Testarossa (Lamboghini Diablo or Countach)
Detomaso Pantera
Old 11-30-2006, 05:58 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #24 (permalink)
Immature Member
 
dentist90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 4,423
Garage
I would think a conversion to a 3.2 isn't that straight forward. Because of the Motronic control you would need a module (not cheap) and the wiring harness to connect the new motor to it. I think it would be easier to try to tweak the extra 20HP or so by modifying your existing engine. A complete teardown of your 3.0 would be cheaper and less headache than the conversion.
__________________
1984 Carrera Coupe = love affair
1997 Eagle Talon Tsi = old girlfriend (RIP)
2014 Chrysler 300 AWD Hemi = family car
"Lowering the bar with every post!"
Old 11-30-2006, 06:06 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #25 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego, CA (La Mesa)
Posts: 574
Garage
I will probably pull the engine and rebuild it and add all sorts of goodies. I am going to wait until I have the time and until it needs it. I rebuilt the motor in my BMW M6 so this can't be that difficult.
__________________
Currently own:
1980 911SC slantnose
1991 Honda Accord -daily driver (1991 Honda Accord #2 - just because)
2003 Acura TL Type-S (2006 Honda Odyssey w/ DVD)

Gone but missed:
1988 Mazda RX-7 Turbo II (1991 Jeep Wrangler Renegade)
1984 Jeep CJ-7 (1994 Chevy Blazer)
1987 Chevy Corvette (1996 Mustang Cobra)
1993 Jeep Wrangler (1995 Mustang GT Conv.)
2003 Ford Explorer Sport Trac (1987 BMW M6)


Future: Hopefully not too far off
Ferrari Testarossa (Lamboghini Diablo or Countach)
Detomaso Pantera
Old 11-30-2006, 06:11 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #26 (permalink)
 
MRM MRM is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Beach, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,713
When the 3.2 was new Car and Driver did a nice story on them and said that the 1984 3.2 was a full second quicker from 0-60 than the 3.0 SC was.

I have an 84 Euro and the difference between the US version and ROW version is quite noticable.
__________________
MRM 1994 Carrera
Old 11-30-2006, 06:54 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #27 (permalink)
Huh Huh is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 279
didn't car and driver do it with a euro spec 3.2? if so did they compare it to the US 3.0 SC? or did they compare it to a euro spec 3.0?
__________________
'94 VW Jetta
'85 VW Scirocco
'81 911 SC coupe Euro
'67 VW Bug
Old 11-30-2006, 06:59 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #28 (permalink)
Registered
 
jaydubya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 946
I can't see any reason to put a $10-15k 3.6L engine into a $10-15k SC. If you want more power,

1) turbocharge your 3.0. It will cost 1/3-1/2 the money of a 3.6l transplant and give you more hp.

2) sell your SC and buy a 964. You'll get the engine plus a more capable suspension and brakes.
__________________
'82 911SC racecar
'05 WRX STi
Old 11-30-2006, 07:21 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #29 (permalink)
Detached Member
 
Hugh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
I've driven my neighbors US 84 and its noticeably slower than my 84 ROW with a Steve Wong chip, no other mods to my car.
__________________
Hugh
Old 11-30-2006, 07:29 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #30 (permalink)
JW Apostate
 
trekkor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Napa, Ca
Posts: 14,164
Anybody going to a bigger motor, I'll be interested in your 3.0...


KT
__________________
'74 914-6 2.6 SS #746
'01 Boxster
Old 11-30-2006, 07:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #31 (permalink)
Registered
 
78-911SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 1,252
Bill if a 3.2 is .2 faster than a 3.0 what is a 3.6 over a 3.0?
__________________
PJ

78 911sc Targa
70 911T
Old 11-30-2006, 08:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #32 (permalink)
 
Immature Member
 
dentist90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 4,423
Garage
Quote:
Originally posted by 78-911SC
Bill if a 3.2 is .2 faster than a 3.0 what is a 3.6 over a 3.0?
.7? No No , wait, I know this. Ummm, carry the 1, add square root of 3.6 to product of the sum of the number of cylinders... got it!

.6
__________________
1984 Carrera Coupe = love affair
1997 Eagle Talon Tsi = old girlfriend (RIP)
2014 Chrysler 300 AWD Hemi = family car
"Lowering the bar with every post!"
Old 11-30-2006, 08:43 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #33 (permalink)
UFLYICU
 
ZOA NOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 5,528
Garage
Send a message via Yahoo to ZOA NOM
Quote:
Originally posted by 81 911 SC
So if you put a 3.2 into a SC the car will be quicker since the SC is lighter than a Carerra.

Not true. 1978 SC = 1236 kg 1984 Carrera = 1210 kg

Look it up. It's a common assumption, but the Carreras are not as heavy, and they are more powerful. They look better too, IMHO
__________________
_______________________
Racer Rix Spec911 #5

prc-racing.com
Old 11-30-2006, 09:02 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #34 (permalink)
Large Registered Member
 
PatrickB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 2,807
Garage
Quote:
Originally posted by Hugh R
I've driven my neighbors US 84 and its noticeably slower than my 84 ROW with a Steve Wong chip, no other mods to my car.
Curious... Does the ROW pass smog?
__________________
'85 Carrera Coupe, Marble Grey #118 JP/R6
'93 Lexus SC400, '00 Ford F-150
'70 911T- 2.7 (SOLD)
Old 11-30-2006, 09:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #35 (permalink)
up-fixing der car(ma)
 
YTNUKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,762
Garage
Send a message via AIM to YTNUKLR
To keep it pretty simple, I would rebuild the 3.0, swap in a 3.2L crank/rods when you're in there (modified to use stock 3.0 p/c, OR use 3.2 p/c), port the heads to 39/37mm, and install 20/21 cams. CIS is easy to live with; TBITZ EFI maybe, if you want to go one more level up. That should make you 220-230 easily with stock exhaust. Better (headers, 993 exchangers) exhaust would net you even more, around 240-250...not smog legal though w/o a cat
__________________
Scott Kinder
kindersport @ gmail.com
Old 12-01-2006, 12:08 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #36 (permalink)
durn for'ner
 
livi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of Sweden
Posts: 17,090
All things considered, sounds like it would be easier to just swap the whole car for a newer model with a 3.2 or 3.6.
__________________
Markus
Resident Fluffer

Carrera '85
Old 12-01-2006, 04:57 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #37 (permalink)
Registered
 
safe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,148
Garage
Quote:
Originally posted by SlantnoseSD

I guess I'm looking for somethign with some grunt....maybe tire smoking power. The 3.0 right now is definately weak.
I heard Juan Ruiz's car is for sale. Selling D Car, Whats Wrong ?

That car has a little grunt and it might even smoke a tire or two

Ps. I don't know Juan or the price of his car.
__________________
Magnus
911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI.
911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day.
924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar.
931 -79 under total restoration.
Old 12-01-2006, 05:24 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #38 (permalink)
JBO JBO is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 758
I agree with dd74. And regarding the whole issue of more power, I felt the way you do when I first got my SC, but then I started driving it a little more aggressively (i.e. taking it a little higher in the rev range before shifting), and it really has all the power that is needed for street driving. If I'm trying to get to 50 or 60 very quickly I can do so. 1st gear off line is really the only negative. Many years ago when I was hoping up my BMW and asked my mechanic about some "upgrades" (chip, etc) he said "how often do you now floor it when accelerating?". The answer was not very often, and his response was "since you are not using the acceleration and power the car already offers, why do you need more power?". Very good question. He is a wise man and a good mechanic, though I did some of the upgrades anyway!!
Old 12-01-2006, 05:38 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #39 (permalink)
Registered
 
m325ix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 1,092
Slantnose, please loose half of your signature, who cares what jetski you had before, it takes half a page to scroll thru that nonsense.

I did this - from 3.0L SC motor to 3.2L with Cams, Lightweight Flywheel, Autothority Mass AirFlow stand alone system+ Autothority ECU chip, SSI non cat with custom muffler.
The new motor feels much stronger, it revs much happier and has more torgue. Yes, it did cost more than the 3.0L rebuild but wouldn't you want something more exciting after you spend your money?

__________________
http://www.mybuildgarage.com/author/carreraboy
Old 12-01-2006, 05:53 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #40 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:22 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.