|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I did a small test. I sucked on the hose going to the distributor and pinched it so it was in full vacuum.
Then I took her for a test drive. I could not feel any difference in performance. Now I'm really confused and feel like I'm in the 'advanced' stages of 'retardness'. I think the only way to answer the retard/advance question is to put timing gun to work. Unfortunatly I don't have one. Next week I'll be visiting someone that does, so I'll remove the hose and suck on it at idle and see if the timing advances or retards. Tony |
||
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If your Dist. vacuum mechanism has only one inlet for a vacuum hose than it is safe to assume that it is a retard type unit. The rotor should rotate slightly clockwise if the vacuum unit is operative to retard the timing. Try checking it with a vacuum pump. It should hold without leaking down.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I had 78 SC that came with a single diaphram vacuum advance only which had absolutely no influence on the way the engine idled.
But, what did make the engine hunt at idle was setting the mixture a bit too rich like most P-wrenches like to do. Cheers, Joe |
||
|
|
|