![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
Difficulty maintaining 911TT or 911 996 from noob
Hello All,
Im trying to get into the market of a slightly used 911TT or 911 996 model and would like to know how difficult it is to work on these cars since they are rear engine. I have worked mostly japanese cars with front engines (changing pulleys, starter, radiator, suspension work, and other basic "engine out" type of work) and not really a big fan of bringing this type of car to the stealership. I would like to know two major things: 1. How difficult to maintain 911TT or 911? (do you have to drop engine on almost everything that you due to lack of access?) 2. Since im on the market, what's your pointers to look for on 996 models? thanks in advance and a great new year 2009 to all! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
You should post this in the 996/Boxter forum for more results.
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,575
|
Main difference is the fact that the 996TT motor is mechanically very different from the normally aspirated 996. The NA 996 has some very well documented issues (RMS seals, Intermediate Shaft failures, etc.) while the 996TT is a VERY reliable engine, at least for what is basically a supercar. IIRC, the 996TT is derived from the GR1 engine and is extremely robust, and also true dry sump. Prices on both are presenting some stunning bargains but I'd say, for the money, the 996TT is an absolute steal these days.
Good Luck
__________________
Buck '88 Coupe, '87 Cab, '88 535i sold, '19 GLC 300 DD Warren Hall, gone but not forgotten |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
thank you to those who replied. since i can always google the issues with these cars my main concern now is how difficult is it to maintain these cars?
I know this is an oxymoron that a very expensive car is being maintained by their owner but theres gotta be atleast some people out here that do all their "out of engine" work themselves...im not thinking of thinkering these cars to build them for the track but rather basic out of engine type of work... pls give me some input. thanks in advance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
Gary R. Last edited by GaryR; 12-30-2008 at 06:23 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
I did a quick search in the 996 forum in regard to your question. Lots of good info here.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/search.php?searchid=2976091
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
link is broke.
im beginning to think most of the 911 owners have employed private porsche mechanics. i know its an oxymoron (expensive car and maintained by the owner?) but theres gotta be someone here that fixes their own car just coz they love doing it. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pittsford, NY
Posts: 3,701
|
Quote:
Not being smart, just straight forward. ![]()
__________________
Tony G 2000 Boxster S |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
as you can see these are basic maintenance and does not require a mechanic on most cars but Id like to know if this is doable on the 996 or 996TT. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 574
|
I do all the work on my Porsche....hell thats part of why I wanted it. A new challenge.
__________________
Darren 1973 911 T MFI 2005 997 Carrera 2001 Toyota 4Runner |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
OK -
1) post in the appropriate forum. This is an air cooled forum and you're asking technical questions about water cooled cars. 2) I've been involved in a number of posts where we have discussed (debated) the relative ease with which one can maintain the water cooled cars versus the liquid cooled cars. I have extensive experience working on my air cooled car and moderate experience working on my liquid cooled car so I feel qualified to comment. We all work on our Porsches, that's the point of the Porsche technical forums, so no it doesn't seem at all odd that you would be considering working on yours. Porsches are as easy to work on as any other car, the motor is just at the other end of the garage. Get over it. In my experience the 996 was easier to work on than the 911, but even then only marginally. I had to do a partial engine drop in my 996 to change a coolant tank, and had to do a full engine drop in my buddies 911 to change a fuel line. Spark plugs, filers, MAF work etc is all done with the engine in the car. The later cars need less overall maintenance than teh eraly cars. I think the biggest difference you'll find working on a Porsche is that you spend more time *under* it as opposed to you Honda or whatever where you spend time working under the hood. It all depends on the work you're doing though. Get over to Rennlist or 6-speed on line where the water cooled guys hang out as has been suggested a number of times. That's where you'll find the info you are looking for mate. There have been 10,000 pages posted on the reliability of the 996 motors, which isn't particularly happy reading, and on the quality of the 996 in general, which for the most part is. good luck.
__________________
jasper 2002 996 - arctic silver - PSS9, H&R sways,X51 oil pan, console delete, AASCO liteweight flywheel, gbox detent, RS motor mounts, 997 shifter. Great car. past: another 2002 996 and a 1978 SC with-webers-cams-etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
when you mentioned "The later cars need less overall maintenance than teh eraly cars." ...do you mean the 996, 997, or both as compared to the 911? this is good to know. happy new yr once again |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
The 993 was particularly tricky to work on as I understand it. Two oil filters for example and one of them was *really* hard to reach. Twin plugs as well, and you know the ones near the back would have been hard to see much less reach. In the 996 - the spark plugs are changed only every 100K miles or whatever, and they're all accessible from underneath. In the 911 you have to get under the hood, and the ones near the back can be a little hard to reach but after you move stuff out of the way you can feel your way through. Another thing that impressed me about the 996 was changing the oil. In the 911 it was two drain plugs and a horizontal oil filter in the engine compartment. In the 996 it's one drain plug and a filter element in a cartridge. I changed the oil in the 996 without even jacking it up! It was lowered too. EZ peezy lemon squeezy as they say over here in the UK. Anyway - don't be afraid of the 996 for ease of maintenance....you may want to be a little afraid of the engine reliability issues however. It's all very well documented but it is also true that the problem(s) have been exaggerated on the internet. That said..my buddy's 2003 M96 motor failed catastrophically, so I know it can happen. When all is said and done I prefer the air cooled cars because they are more interesting....as you would expect from a vintage sports car. I prefer the liquid cooled cars because they perform better. When I get back into my next Porsche (I'm working overseas at the moment) I will be conflicted but will probably go for another 996 (or maybe 997 by then) because they are such excellent value. Performance wise they are spectacular...and my 911 was built to the tits so that's saying something. ![]()
__________________
jasper 2002 996 - arctic silver - PSS9, H&R sways,X51 oil pan, console delete, AASCO liteweight flywheel, gbox detent, RS motor mounts, 997 shifter. Great car. past: another 2002 996 and a 1978 SC with-webers-cams-etc. Last edited by jwetering; 01-01-2009 at 01:23 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|