![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,286
|
my smog check result, question
Last year my 15mph CO% was .40, not it's .62
Last year 15mph HC(PPM) was 24, now it's 38 The smog tech told me if I do tune up, it'll do it. Well, I just did plugs, cap, rotor, and oil (brad penn) is pretty new. What cause those things go higher? Unburn/incomplete gas burn, but why? Last year I was using NGK BP7ES. This time I am using NGK BPR6ES Here is my NGK BP7ES looked like when I took it out last week. ![]() Thanks.
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
|
Bad ignition wires will cause your numbers to go up.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St.Louis MO
Posts: 447
|
I believe higher CO and HC both translate to "rich" - hows your airfilter look?
__________________
1989 Carrera 3.2L in 993 bodywork |
||
![]() |
|
Free minder
|
These numbers can be easily reduced by increasing the ignition advance at idle. More advance will make it run leaner. Maybe your advance is a little too low right now.
__________________
1978 SC Targa, DC15 cams, 9.3:1 cr, backdated heat, sport exhaust https://1978sctarga.car.blog/ 2014 Cayenne platinum edition 2008 Benz C300 (wife’s) 2010 Honda Civic LX (daughter’s) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,107
|
Increased ignition advance at idle increases HC emission, about 1.4% per degree. It is the entire concept behind vacuum retard. Ignition timing has nothing to do with "rich" or "lean", these are mass A/F ratio terms based on deviation from stoich (14.7:1). Elevated HC usually indicates an ignition misfire. Elevated CO is usually a result of incorrectly rich AFR and is insensitive to ignition timing at idle.
Neither of these readings are high or out of spec, what is the issue ? Variations can be due to temperature, fuel composition, testing equipment. Timing and mixture are set by the ECU on Motronics.
__________________
Paul |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 650
|
What's the o2 numbers?
Tinker |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,286
|
At 15mph, the O2 was at 1.4, now is 1.7
regarding the air filter, I just remember I cleaned it well last year right before the smog test. This time I did take it out but it look ok so I didn't clean it. Another thing was my car idle low, I like it. Recently, I adjusted it a little higher, still a little lower than spec. Also, last year, I gapped the BP7ES at .032. This year, I gapped the BPR6ES at .036
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 294
|
I had nearly the same issue and I "cleaned" my o2 sensor and that did the trick! Just take it out and heat it up with a propane torch then dunk it in a glass of water. The expanding and contraction will break the carbon off of it, you will see bits of it in the glass. I repeated the heating and cooling about 15 times, there was a lot in the middle or inside of the sensor.
__________________
84 911 Cab 87 911 Targa 88 930 Cab M505 Slant Nose 62 356B Gone ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,286
|
How hot proximately did you heat it up? You stick it in close to the nozzle or at the end of the flame?
Thanks.
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
Just stick it into the flame and heat it up really red hot and dunk it.
__________________
84 911 Cab 87 911 Targa 88 930 Cab M505 Slant Nose 62 356B Gone ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,286
|
alright, heat heat. Thanks Seafood.
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,708
|
Why did you go with the slightly hotter plug?
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Posts: 294
|
alright, let me know what hapens.
Sean
__________________
84 911 Cab 87 911 Targa 88 930 Cab M505 Slant Nose 62 356B Gone ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,286
|
because that is most people recommended on this board. If I don't feel any different, I will go back to the BP7ES next time.
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
|
I am having emissions issues as well....
.....is there a way to test the O2 sensor without any specialty tools (other than maybe a VOM) b4 having to replace it? The Service book I have says you need a "pinout test harness", I am hoping there is a way around that.
Any input would be great. Also, Is there anywhere to go for the best price on an O2 snsor if I need one? thanks, Lee |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 650
|
Copied from a site a while back:
"Testing O2 sensors on the workbench. Use a high impedence DC voltmeter as above. Clamp the sensor in a vice, or use a plier or vice-grip to hold it. Clamp your negative voltmeter lead to the case, and the positive to the output wire. Use a propane torch set to high and the inner blue flame tip to heat the fluted or perforated area of the sensor. You should see a DC voltage of at least 0.6 within 20 seconds. If not, most likely cause is open circuit internally or lead fouling. If OK so far, remove from flame. You should see a drop to under 0.1 volt within 4 seconds. If not likely silicone fouled. If still OK, heat for two full minutes and watch for drops in voltage. Sometimes, the internal connections will open up under heat. This is the same a loose wire and is a failure. If the sensor is OK at this point, and will switch from high to low quickly as you move the flame, the sensor is good. Bear in mind that good or bad is relative, with port fuel injection needing faster information than carbureted systems. ANY O2 sensor that will generate 0.9 volts or more when heated, show 0.1 volts or less within one second of flame removal, AND pass the two minute heat test is good regardless of age. When replacing a sensor, don't miss the opportunity to use the test above on the replacement. This will calibrate your evaluation skills and save you money in the future. There is almost always *no* benefit in replacing an oxygen sensor that will pass the test in the first line of this paragraph." Tinker |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
|
O2 test
Thanks Tinker, I will give this a try this weekend and see what happens (unless I am forced to do too many "honey-do" items). I will post you results.
Lee |
||
![]() |
|