![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Adding Lightness
![]() Any ideas on how I can get more weight off the front? I really dig the whole "rear weight bias thing". "Simplify, then add lightness." - Colin Chapman
__________________
Bondo sucks. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Magnolia State
Posts: 7,548
|
Looks pretty light as she sits
![]() 'glass/carbon fiber hood, fenders, bumpers....lightweight battery...coil over set up or hollow sways...helium in tires? Where ya going with the build?
__________________
Jim 1987 Carrera 2002 BMW 525ti 1997 Buell Cyclone cafe project 1998 Buell S1W: "Angriest motorcycle I've ever ridden." Last edited by Dueller; 12-04-2009 at 10:19 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Clever, is it the unobtanium front end or the helium filled fuel cell?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wallkill Ny
Posts: 15
|
Looks pretty light to me, it's floating in the front!
Is that a potato gun up by the ceiling? What year is your shell?
__________________
'72 RS clone in progress '56 550 Spyder replica |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,072
|
Quote:
When you build a proper lightweight your problem is certainly going to be too little weight up front, not too much. First, realize that if you remove weight equally front and rear you're actually increasing the rear weight bias. IE a remove 200 lbs front and rear from a 950 front/ 1450 rear car and rear weight bias moves from 60% to 62.5%. It's also much easier to remove weight from the front- fiberglass hood, fenders, bumper, lightweight battery, less fuel, no spare, 935 front suspension, etc. It's very tough to remove similar weight from the rear. In my experience it's tough to get good turn-in, etc with more than roughly 62% weight on the rear. My suggestion would be to pull weight where you find it but with a focus on the rear; you'll still find the distribution will move rearwards. After that if you want more rear weight bias relocate the battery to behind the seats- this alone will move the weight distribution by ~1%. Unless you have very fat rear tires, however, I'll bet you it'll handle worse... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Magnolia State
Posts: 7,548
|
Quote:
__________________
Jim 1987 Carrera 2002 BMW 525ti 1997 Buell Cyclone cafe project 1998 Buell S1W: "Angriest motorcycle I've ever ridden." Last edited by Dueller; 12-04-2009 at 11:40 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
subscribed
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You should probably get that car out of there before it falls on a stripper. Cool pole.
![]()
__________________
78’ SC 911 Targa - 3.2SS, PMO 46, M&K 2/2 1 5/8” HEADERS, 123 DIST, PORTERFIELD R4-S PADS, KR75 CAMS, REBEL RACING BUSHINGS, KONI CLASSICS |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,072
|
Quote:
My suspicion is that the bars probably wouldn't change much with weight distribution, if at all. I'd rank intended usage, tire type, power, overall weight and other suspension components all as more important variables than weight distribution with regards to T-bar size. But as I say I'm at the limit of my experience here... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 244
|
LMAO ! snbush67
sdeason1 nice photoshop skillz... Did anyone notice the missing jack stand?!?
__________________
74' Coupe 3.6 Track Car VW passat avant 4motion 1.8T CRG Kalifornia 125Rotax (Sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Magnolia State
Posts: 7,548
|
lol...we've been punk'd
![]()
__________________
Jim 1987 Carrera 2002 BMW 525ti 1997 Buell Cyclone cafe project 1998 Buell S1W: "Angriest motorcycle I've ever ridden." |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Or the VDO clock dead center of the picture?
__________________
78’ SC 911 Targa - 3.2SS, PMO 46, M&K 2/2 1 5/8” HEADERS, 123 DIST, PORTERFIELD R4-S PADS, KR75 CAMS, REBEL RACING BUSHINGS, KONI CLASSICS |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 244
|
![]() LMAO!! Just messing snbush67
__________________
74' Coupe 3.6 Track Car VW passat avant 4motion 1.8T CRG Kalifornia 125Rotax (Sold) Last edited by wax105; 12-04-2009 at 01:07 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Navin Johnson
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wantagh, NY
Posts: 8,784
|
Shot of my scales last time I set up my car.. '69 911 1846# wet
Took a bit of dialing in, but the car handles like its on rails.. no push, hint of oversteer, etc..only about 180hp now, the engines next iteration shoul be in the 210 range.. I'm sure Ill have to tweek the set up due to the increased power ![]()
__________________
Don't feed the trolls. Don't quote the trolls ![]() http://www.southshoreperformanceny.com '69 911 GT-5 '75 914 GT-3 and others |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,072
|
Quote:
It's probably getting close to 38/62 with driver? For autocross we've found we've been quicker with some ballast up front when we've gotten significantly on the far side of 62 with driver, but that's without a lot of tire stagger and with a 7:1 power to weight. It's easier to dial the same car in at the track. Good pchop. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Not Photoshop
I was trying to make sure the chassis is straight.
The rear is weighted down with sandbags and the torsion tube is acting as a fulcrum on the two jack stands. '67 911 Yes, it's a potato gun: YouTube - Pumpkin Death
__________________
Bondo sucks. |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
this would be a GREAT time to measure the torsional twist in the bare chassis
then add some structure & re-test... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
I finally got her stripped. Last time I weighed her she was #2875. Now if I could only get some lb's out of me!!!After all this work it kills me to put my fat ass in the car. see ya soon. ![]()
__________________
1980 911SC #99 track car, 993 3.6, 50 PMO's 2019 Ford F150 da dragger 2015 MB SL400 wifey DD 2008 E93 M3 DD 2007 E60 530 wifey winter beater |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|