![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
|
Buying used - Best years? Worst years?
OK, so I've always wanted a 911... and after BMWs, a Volvo S60R, etc etc, I am finally in a position that I can afford to maintain a decent used 911.
Here is what I need to know - what years are the good years to buy, from a frequency of repair standpoint? What I mean by that is in my experience, every manufacturer has good years and bad - for example, the 1999 Volvo S80 was a black hole for repairs, whereas the 2005 S60R is a gem that shames Hondas. Likewise with BMWs, etc etc. If I was looking at water cooled 911s (I live in Louisiana, so I'm guessing air cooled isn't the best idea, but I'm not opposed to air cooled on principle or anything). So... what years should I look at, and which should I avoid like the plague? Edited to add - I want a manual transmission, automatic need not apply. Hardtop, no cabriolets. I like AWD quite a but BUT would be perfectly happy with 2WD. Last edited by curious sam; 06-20-2010 at 10:58 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
1989 964 Carrera 4 or Carrera 2. Good HVAC for LA, nice interior, option of 4 wheel drive. Air cooled, looks classic.
If not, then a 993 Carrera 4 or Carrera 2. Cost more than the above.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
|
I was looking at 2004 models - appears a base carrera without bells/whistles can be had in the mid 30's on eBay and autotrader.
Any particular years for the 993 if I go that route? Last edited by curious sam; 06-20-2010 at 11:38 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
There is a big difference in character between the air-cooled cars and 996/997. On this forum, everyone will recommend something air-cooled. Probably a 911SC or Carrera 3.2
You should drive a few of the models you are considering. Also, try the 996/997 Forum down the page of Pelican Parts Technical Forums. Porsche 996/997 Forum - Pelican Parts Technical BBS 993s are all pretty good. 964 vs 993, a systems analysis All models have their issues/quirks. Just find one that makes you happy to drive and do not think of this as a logical/sane investment, just a play thing. ![]()
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
|
It will be a daily driver. I'm considering an Avalon as a third vehicle for times I need a backseat/rain/etc or times the wife doesn't need an Expedition.
I fully understand buying a used 911 isn't logical or sane, but life is short and a 911 simply needs to happen. Thanks for the quick replies and guidance! Sounds like I do need to do some more research and test drives.... Last edited by curious sam; 06-20-2010 at 11:55 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 9,813
|
Quote:
1. Why do you want a 911? 2. Do you need creature comforts or full on luxury? 3. Does resale value make a difference to you? 4. What is your budget? 5. What kind of BMWs did you have?
__________________
'24 Tesla Model 3, '22 Tesla Model Y '19 Tacoma '06 Carrera, '79 930 '06 S4 Avant |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
|
1. I've always loved them. Family had them. FWIW, I don't want a boy racer set up - I want the smallest wheels possible, i.e. most tire, i.e. least likely to crack a rim.
2. I'm not opposed to creature comforts and luxury, but they aren't deal breakers. 3. Resale... good question. I'll either drive it into the ground or sell it in 3-5 years so that I can take Euro delivery of a new one. 4. My budget is flexible between $20-$40K, obviously less is better, but if the difference is made up in the lack of headaches and reapir bills - otay. 5. M3 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,239
|
Based on what you just answered I´d say a 993 C2. I´d never look at driving any car into the ground. Take care of them and they´ll take care of you thats my motto. 996´s the first of the water cooled for me have less soul unless its a turbo or GT3 and the first 996´s had engine problems. A good low mileage 993 is what you want. Get a pre purchase inspection done and if it comes up trumps then you´re in. Its the last of the air cooled beasts and maintenance is still relatively simple
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 9,813
|
Quote:
As for M3s, this is how I would compare a 911 to a M3. Personally, I had an E30 M3 and love my 911 way better! E30 M3 - 911 E36 M3 - 964 E46 M3 - 993 If you are getting a water cooled car, $40k will get you a base 997, whereas it could get you a 996 turbo with higher mileage. Come up a little more and a 996 GT3 is possible. Just drive all of them to see which you like the best.
__________________
'24 Tesla Model 3, '22 Tesla Model Y '19 Tacoma '06 Carrera, '79 930 '06 S4 Avant |
||
![]() |
|
UnRegistered User
|
Best 911---- The one you can afford.
The worst 911---- The one you want but can't afford. Good luck with your search and post pictures when you find "the one".
__________________
Bill K. "I started out with nothin and I still got most of it left...." 83 911 SC Guards Red (now gone) And I sold a bunch of parts I hadn't installed yet. |
||
![]() |
|
wannabee wannabee
|
But if you prefer watercooled over the aircooled 993's may I suggest a 997 which looks way better than a 996.
__________________
99 C4 - (let's try this once more) 07 Cayman S - sold 11/17 (not the same) 84 Carrera - sold 3/16 (geez what have I done!) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 1,340
|
I'm in Monroe and on my third air cooled 911. All good advice above, get the newest you can. Older ones like mine, I have a 1988, do require a bit of maintaining on your own so if your are not capable, knowing a good mechanic is recommended. I find the joy of owning an older 911 to be part of the experience. I actually love working on my car and it is not that much effort or that difficult. Good luck in your search.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,948
|
I humbly suggest that you log on to Amazon.com and place an order for the 8th Edition of my book, The Used 911 Story, which covers the beginning through 2005 models. You just never know what you'll discover!
__________________
Keep the Shiny Side UP! Pete Z. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Used 911 Story
Quote:
![]()
__________________
1981 Porsche 911SC, 2001 Porsche Boxster, 1963 Jaguar MK2, 2001 Jaguar XJR, 1991 Mercedes 500SL, 1973 Opel GT, 1981 Mercedes 380SLC, 1994 BMW 325ic, 1980 BMW 320is, 1983 BMW 320i, 1974 MGB, 1999 Audi A6, 1995 BMW 740iL, 1995 BMW 325iC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10
|
Get an SC any year. The motors are bullet proof.
I had one for 10 years with lots of mods. It never let me down-once! Rich |
||
![]() |
|
Grappler
|
Based on what your criteria is Sam, I would agree that the 993 is your best match.
__________________
Grappler Know Gi / No Gi 1976 RSR Backdate (Turbo 3.2) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
|
Totally agree.
__________________
Steve Weiner Rennsport Systems Portland Oregon (503) 244-0990 porsche@rennsportsystems.com www.rennsportsystems.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I've owned pretty much everything Porsche made (except a 944) since I bought my first one in 1972, so I speak with some experience...
In your situation, I'd recommend a '92-94 964 Carrera 2 or a 993, preferably a 1995 model. These cars are very reliable and have air conditioning that actually functions as air conditioning should. In Louisiana you really don't need the extra weight/complexity of 4 wheel drive. Unless you live in snow country the 2 wheel drive versions generally have better resale value. And while my favorite Porsche to drive is the '87-89 3.2 Carrera with the G50 transmission due to the more "involving" driving experience they offer, the A/C systems on these cars are horrid unless you spend thousands to upgrade them. My 3.2 is a "weekender", not a daily driver. Every 911 version since the first one has it's strong and weak areas. None of them are perfect. The later 964's are especially good value for money and are probably the most underappreciated 911 of all. Stay away from the 1990 models unless the cylinder head sealing issue has been addressed.
__________________
Jack 2007 GT3 gone but not forgotten: 1987 Carrera IROC backdate, '89 Carrera M491, '96 993, '93 964 RSA(two), '00 996, '97 Boxster, '79 911SC, '78 928, '76 924, '75 914, '74 911, '74 914, '72 911E, '72 911T/V, '71 911T, '70 911T, '66 912, '65 356C, '61 356B roadster, '60 356B |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
great info > http://www.pelicanparts.com/911/technical_specs/911_guthrie_faq.htm
__________________
'88 Carrera ![]() Last edited by bdisco; 06-21-2010 at 10:23 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
|
Gentlemen, you are a wealth of information and I thank you.
I'm looking at 993s now, but I have to ask about the 1995 cars - why are they more desirable than a 1996 or 1997? As far as AWD vs 2WD - I like the stability and peace of mind AWD allows for. I will likely take my car to a driving school or two as I'm aware that physics can and will eventually come into play with regard to where the engine is placed on those cars... I know AWD isn't a cure all for driving stupidity, but I also know my S60R feels faster than my M3 did and yet I have never even come close to feeling like I was on the edge of losing traction. Last edited by curious sam; 06-21-2010 at 10:23 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|