|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Beave, OR
Posts: 6,288
|
Picture yourself a year from now walking into your garage and seeing a beautiful longhood 911. Are you picturing it? OK, now...do you miss the SC? No? But you have an extra warm feeling in your heart becuase your Porsche is now extra special to you, right? Problem solved.
Screw originality. These are our cars for us to have fun with. DO IT.
__________________
Doug Currently Between Porsches PART OF MY SOUL: '09 Boxster 2.9 PDK, '86 911, '76 912E, '06 Cayman S, '90 911 C4, '74 911, '78 911 Targa, '01 Boxster, '70 911T, '99 Boxster (#2), '72 911T, '88 911, '99 Boxster (#1), '84 911 Turbo Look, '73 911 Targa, '88 944 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Beave, OR
Posts: 6,288
|
Quote:
..ok, I had it pre-backdate.That's a fairly high dollar (of course high quality) backdate by TRE if I recall. But after chatting with them, one can get a much more budget friendly backdate from TRE if you didn't want to do it yourself.
__________________
Doug Currently Between Porsches PART OF MY SOUL: '09 Boxster 2.9 PDK, '86 911, '76 912E, '06 Cayman S, '90 911 C4, '74 911, '78 911 Targa, '01 Boxster, '70 911T, '99 Boxster (#2), '72 911T, '88 911, '99 Boxster (#1), '84 911 Turbo Look, '73 911 Targa, '88 944 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
Let's elevate this discussion to another level. The following 2 links talk about taking a perfectly good racing 2.1L Turbo 911 ( one of two in existence)....and transforming it *back* to one of its earlier iterations ( 2.8L RSR).
The question?...Correct to do?.....or not? ....considering..... 1.) the number of real RSR's compared to the number of real 2.1L Turbo's around, and 2.) the fact that the starting point of the 2.1L Turbo was * not* a burned-out or badly damaged example, where one could more easily choose which prior version to restore it to... but actually starting with quite a nice, old, as-raced condition 2.1L turbo. First TURBO Racer GONE 935 Pornography (Latest Gunnar Racing car) .... my comments start at #3 ( "Yep..it's the same axe. Replaced the handle three times and the head twice....but its the same axe !!..." )
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 12,025
|
We are talking about a dime a dozen 911SC here..... It is the owner's car to modify how he sees fit. So if the OP likes the early car look, I think he should do it if he has the funds to do so.
Cheers
__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep www.turn3autosport.com 997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Cayenne Turbo, Macan Turbo, 69 911, Mini R53 JCW , RADICAL SR3 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Well if I was going to spend the money, I'd backdate a middie '87 or newer cabriolet, just to get the G50...and make it my daily driver (seeing as how I already own a longhood coupe fore play). That would give me the 'look' that I prefer and at the same time it would be unique (relatively) as there were no factory longhood cabriolets. But at the end of the day ...it's your money so spend it for you not for us.
__________________
Jeremy ![]() 1971 911 Wide One 2.7 2012 911 Cabriolet 2011 Cayenne S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,277
|
R K T,
"ps... I had a real 55 Speedster, and I got tired of explaining to people that it WASN"T a fake!" Hilarious! I have a buddy who had a 59 coupe and a 58 speedster and he dealt with the same thing. We always laugh about it. ![]() And your car makes me seriously reconsider my thoughts on backdating mine. That is one beautiful car!
__________________
1983 SC - sold 2002 996 C4S - sold 1968 912 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
be here now
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: somewhere. not here.
Posts: 2,544
|
Thanks Mickey!
Three pages of advice. Like all the other threads about "should I or shouldn't I".....It really is up to you and what you want. For as many "go for it" opinions, you'll get the same number of "don't do it". It's up to you. I am lovin' my BD, happy I bought it ......but glad I let the previous owner do the grunting and sweating! another pic....OK? ![]() ![]()
__________________
Rob.... '66 911, '74 911, '85.5 944, '69 914-6, '65 356C, '01 986, '04 955S, '97 993 C2S, '55 356 OUTLAW, '98 993 Cab, '55 356 Speedster, '06 955S, '58 356A, '96 993 C4S, '87 BD 911, '95 993, '06 997S, '11 997.2S, '74 914 2.7, '15 981S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,079
|
I stewed over backdate plans for 6 months while shopping for a good short hood base car. In the end I decided to build an SC hotrod. If I was to backdate I wanted a period color which meant painting the car, then the black window trim would look out of place so that would have to go, then of course door handles, mirrors and then the labor to get every lined up right. I have seen some wonderful work on this forum and then I have seen too many backdates with turn signals and taillights that don't fit right, droopy bumpers, wonky horn grills, and bad panel fit etc. For some this may be fine (I certainly enjoyed driving my stripped out ratrod for 6 months before my project started and did not care how it looked) but from previous experience I knew at some point I would want it to look right. I did not have the skills to do the work myself and my budget would not stretch to paying someone to do the work to the standard that I would be happy with long term so it was a hotrod SC for me.
__________________
1983 Porsche 911SC - Arrow Blue lightweight '74 Carrera look http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/498568-overdue-intro-sc-hotrod-project.html |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,277
|
And I can't think of two better examples of what can be done on either side than the the two guys posting above. Both beautiful cars that I would be proud to own. So see, there is no right or wrong answer
![]() Rob, I still think that dash is genius!!!
__________________
1983 SC - sold 2002 996 C4S - sold 1968 912 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 585
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
be here now
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: somewhere. not here.
Posts: 2,544
|
Thank You Mickey!
__________________
Rob.... '66 911, '74 911, '85.5 944, '69 914-6, '65 356C, '01 986, '04 955S, '97 993 C2S, '55 356 OUTLAW, '98 993 Cab, '55 356 Speedster, '06 955S, '58 356A, '96 993 C4S, '87 BD 911, '95 993, '06 997S, '11 997.2S, '74 914 2.7, '15 981S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I say go ahead with the backdate!
I did it and am quite happy. Here are before and after pics. ![]()
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
RKT...... whether backdated or not...put a cover on that positive battery post !
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,239
|
[QUOTE=R K T;5529137]I started my lifelong Porsche addiction with a 66 911, that I bought in 67. I've been the "caretaker" of 15 different Porsches through the years since. When I sold my 993 C4S last year I really wanted another early car, but all I found was expensive "serial numbers" and cars that I wouldn't want to drive like I want to drive. I found an 87 that was BD'd by a fellow Pelican that I felt was exactly what I wanted. He had done the hard work, all that was left was the interior, and I just completed it. I've got way more in receipts than what I paid for it. It's what I wanted. AND....if anyone thinks it's a fake, I don't give a ....
before ![]() and after ![]() I donīt mean to be unfair but am I alone in thinking that what really has made the difference here is not the backdate but the Fuchs alloys and that absolutely magnificent paint job? |
||
|
|
|
|
be here now
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: somewhere. not here.
Posts: 2,544
|
Already done! Thanks
__________________
Rob.... '66 911, '74 911, '85.5 944, '69 914-6, '65 356C, '01 986, '04 955S, '97 993 C2S, '55 356 OUTLAW, '98 993 Cab, '55 356 Speedster, '06 955S, '58 356A, '96 993 C4S, '87 BD 911, '95 993, '06 997S, '11 997.2S, '74 914 2.7, '15 981S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,650
|
I've built a lightweight SC:
![]() and I've built a backdated '77: ![]() As far as projects go they both have their pros and cons. Backdating is far more involved. Just decide what YOU want to do and do it. I know I know...easier said than done! (If it helps I sold the SC to partially fund the '77 backdate project which I don't plan on selling) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
So being a Saturday the wife and I had to take advantage of the sunny weather and take the SC for a drive...
every time I looked at it I started thinking of what the car would look like backdated (or even as was posted maybe an IROC replacement) they are two totally different directions and my first instinct would be to follow my original love for older 911s. So here is the deal...I am willing to pay $7,500 (exterior only - I want to try to tackle the interior myself) for a conversion to backdate. Is that too little as if I think it would be significantly more then I will just consider buying a 912 and leaving the SC alone. I completely understand that a lot depends that how much I do myself but as said earlier most of the work would be done by a body shop. This brings me to my final annoying question... Me and 2 of my other local Porsche cohorts have been having a debate..... 1 says that it is better to not spend the money on the SC and buy another car as I will most likely have better odds of recouping my cost upon resale when compared to the satisfaction I would derive from driving an older car. The other says more vehicles...more cost for maintenance, insurance, repairs. Stick simple and consolidated...compiling my money and efforts into a top notch Porsche. Personally I lean toward the first option but definitely see the appeal of the second. I love the thought of consolidation and simplicity. At the risk of sounding indecisive....what are your thoughts on this... ...I know its another question (or two).... apologies...just want to be as sure as possible before starting the bloody endeavor. By the way - A tip of the hat to those that have performed backdates on their cars...I think one of the great fascinations of being a gear head is making a car your own. In addition, I respect those purists for staying true to the original vision of the engineers that designed these cars. Regardless of what camp you sit in...we cant argue that these cars make fantastic examples of what driving is all about. And with that my friends....I finish the bottle of Merlot and call it a night. (eagerly awaiting the responses to my above query)
__________________
1979 Porsche 911 SC 1980 Ferrari 308 GTSi 2000 Range Rover HSE 2004 Mercedes E55 AMG |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 1,277
|
You'll sort it out. I had my two toy cars (the replica speedster and mySC) and found the maintenance, upkeep, etc... of both the be a bit much for me. In my case I too wanted to simplify things so I had to make a choice and the SC won. I figured I'd take some of the money from the sale of the replica and put it into the SC to make it what I wanted. I guess I'm kinda in the same boat as you, I'm not completely sure what I want it to be yet.
__________________
1983 SC - sold 2002 996 C4S - sold 1968 912 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 585
|
You could blow your entire $7500 budget on paint alone and that's just about where a fairly decent paint job starts.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Co. Carlow, Ireland
Posts: 455
|
My preference would be to get an early car in addition to your SC. Others have said that the driving experience of an early car is different to a back-date anyway. If this is the case then having an early car in addition to your SC gives you 2 different driving experiences. You get to enjoy the difference driving experiences of both cars, choosing whatever you fancy as the moods takes you.
Also, having 2 classic cars in some ways takes a lot of pressure off the ownership of each one. If you have one car off the road whilst you do jobs on it, then you still have the other to enjoy. And if one ends up needing significant work, then there is not such an urgency to have it fixed as you still have the other car to enjoy. And finally, if you do find you significantly prefer the ownership experience of one car over the other, then you can also thinking about getting rid of whichever car isn't your favourite. If you backdate your SC you might never find out what the ownership experience of an early car is really like, and so you might never have this informed option.
__________________
Charles '84 911 3.2 |
||
|
|
|