![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
Registered
|
Why does my ride height look so high even though it's lower than spec
I measured my front ride height (center of wheel to center of torsion bar cap) to be ~4.75in which means my car is 0.5inch lower than even the Euro spec. Yet it looks very high as seen from the wheel well/tire gap. I have 15inch wheels and my tires are 215/60R15. Does this look normal?
![]() ![]()
__________________
81 -930 82 - Austin Mini 998 78 Mini 1275cc -totaled 83SC Euro w/77 3.0 Carerra Eng.--sold Several other daily drivers not worth mentioning... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
You got a smaller diameter wheel!!!! Most people use the 16" diameter wheels. Look at someone's car with 16" wheels and compare. Tony Last edited by boyt911sc; 10-21-2010 at 08:41 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
gduke2010
|
the 15" tires with 215/60 tires. I think 50 sires are more common. Try looking up different tire sizes on Tire Rack. You can look at how the different sizes look on your car.
|
||
![]() |
|
RETIRED
|
What is the height from the top of the wheel arch to the floor?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,179
|
50 tires would be even shorter and thus fill up the wheel well even less, making the wheel to fender gap increase.
__________________
M |
||
![]() |
|
Now in 993 land ...
|
Most people go a lot lower than that. And they may have larger diameter wheels / tires.
George |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
Here's mine at 25 rear, 25 front on 16 inch wheel, 205/55 and 245/45(yeah I know it should measure higher in front
![]() At certain angles I think it looks too high, compared to others. ![]() Then I take a pic like this and it looks pretty slick- ![]()
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
the correct way to do it is to measure from the floor to the center of the axle and from the floor to the center of the torsion bar (this is under the car and harder to do). Then subtract the 2 #s. alternately for a less precise but easier to get #, measure from the floor to the wheel arch at the axle center.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Northern Motorhead
|
Quote:
Your car is real lucky,it gets to sleep on a nice warm carpet ... lol Cheers ! Phil
__________________
Cheers Phil 89 Coupe,Black,95 3.6 engine and the list goes on ... 1983 944 SP2 race car PCA #96 |
||
![]() |
|
Keepin' it Simple...
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MO, 63141
Posts: 1,663
|
Remember the math here folks.... a 215/60R15 tire is 25.2" in diameter, which is actually BIGGER in diameter than what we are used to dealing with/seeing on SC's (stock = 205/55R16 = 24.9" diameter).
Since the OP shows a picture of the front left tire, I will assume that is corner that was measured. Unfortunately, that corner varies the most based on how the car is loaded (driver/no driver and amount of gas in the tank). It is always tricky, in my opinion, to get the right "look" with the car just sitting there AND have the numbers "in-spec"... As a footnote, something that I find interesting is that Porsche really didn't mess with the STOCK overall tire diameter much through the years. It hovers right around 25" pretty much from '65-'89. Again, in my opinion, it almost seems like they were more worried about aesthetics than performance as, on the whole, the fender archs didn't really change all that much through the years (flares excluded)... they had holes to fill and a 25" diameter circle looked best to them!? Certainly performace came into it as the tires got better and the wheel diameters could increase, but in the end they just swallowed up the 25" diameter tire with bigger wheels. Anyway, got side tracked there... my advice to the OP would be to get 1/2-5/8 of a tank of fuel onboard, have someone of similar weight sit in the driver's seat, make sure the front trunk isn't too full of junk, then measure the fender lip to the ground for a quick check. Stock Euro height would put that number somewhere around 25 to 25.5".
__________________
-Doug 1968 911R Clone; 11/07-?? (forever the project car ![]() 1978 911SC Midnight Blue Metallic Coupe; 7/05-11/09 (so long impact bumpers) 1973.5 911T Sepia Brown Coupe; 9/98-8/99 (went to a great home) 1973.5 911T Gulf Orange Targa; 5/97-11/02 (went back to Germany) Last edited by R_Builder; 10-22-2010 at 05:39 AM.. Reason: typo! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capistrano Beach, Ca.
Posts: 7,235
|
jwakil, please clarify this statement: "I measured my front ride height (center of wheel to center of torsion bar cap)" as it does not correspond to the picture you posted and it's causing confusion. Did you, in fact, measure as shown below?:
![]() I ask because if the 4.75" you mention is measured as in the photo, it is incorrect.
__________________
L.J. Recovering Porsche-holic Gave up trying to stay clean Stabilized on a Pelican I.V. drip |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
81 -930 82 - Austin Mini 998 78 Mini 1275cc -totaled 83SC Euro w/77 3.0 Carerra Eng.--sold Several other daily drivers not worth mentioning... Last edited by jwakil; 10-22-2010 at 10:29 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
I never, never found the spec measurements posted by Porsche as shown in the preceding diagrams to make sense...and I've posted on this factoid before on this board and others... never getting any satisfactory answers.
R_builder is absolutely correct...do the math... a 215/60-15 is 25.2" rolling diameter and a 205/55-16 is just under 25". Also true....from the 185/70-15 days and before...all Porsche rolling diameters for tires were about 25" (+/-). We are admonished NOT to use the 25.5" from-floor-to-top of wheel arch measurement ( front) and 25" basis-rear.... but trying to do it the supposed "right" way never made any mathematical sense using Porsche's a, b and c dimensions....wonder why? Show us lower A-arm at static ride height.....should be slightly angled-down toward ball-joints....some of us lower to get the A-arms near "parallel" to ground...but never go lower with the ball-joint-end being higher than the inboard pivot.
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) Last edited by Wil Ferch; 10-22-2010 at 01:11 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,673
|
15" wheel is stock for an SC, the 16" were optional (but almost all US cars had 16's).
Peter Zimmmerman (posts on Pelican) who wrote "The Used 911 Story" actually prefers the 15 inch wheels on the SC - much nicer ride, etc. Lower the front, another 1/2 inch or so, it's easy, and see if you like it. You may want a bump steer kit. Is the other front wheel the same? How are the rears? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
If its "too high"....then getting it "back down" will not necessarily require a bump steer kit. True enough....even factory correct ride height may beg for bump-steer correction, but it won't be bad and is usually not necessary. To the original poster, let's see lower A-arm angularity.
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
An alignment will be necessary if you lower it more than .25. Probably best to get it done if it's been a while.
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: sectors R&N, SE Pa
Posts: 3,117
|
jwakil, can you provide the actual numbers (a, and b)?
__________________
Dan '87 Targa Carrera 3.2 - Fabspeed Cat Bypass, M&K Muffler, SW Chip Venetian Blue |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Capistrano Beach, Ca.
Posts: 7,235
|
Quote:
![]() If you are trying to lower the car body (point B in diagram) relative to the center of the wheel (point A), then the gap measurement that results should be larger than the 124mm indicated, not smaller. So according to your measurements, you actually raised your car. Remember, measurement B is from the ground to the torsion bar and you want to get that measurement smaller--closer to the ground. The measurement A is from the ground to the center of the wheel hub and it does not change no matter what you do to the adjuster. Therefore the gap between A measurement and B measurement would increase . Am I missing something?
__________________
L.J. Recovering Porsche-holic Gave up trying to stay clean Stabilized on a Pelican I.V. drip Last edited by ossiblue; 10-22-2010 at 05:13 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
It looks high for being lowered to lower than Euro. I have no idea why - sorry.
My height (I think) is stock USA. My old 50 series looked like golf cart tires. ![]() My new 60 series are about 1-3/4" taller in diameter and make parking lot maneuvering much easier. ![]() There is a surprising variance in the actual heights/diameters of 205/60 and 215/60 tires between different manufacturers. Tire rack is one of the few sites which list them. You should be almost 25" diameter, but could be less than 24" from what I've seen in the charts. From memory, Hankook tires run small on some models. What brand tires are you running?
__________________
1977 911S Targa 2.7L (CIS) Silver/Black 2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe (AWD) 3.7L Black on Black 1989 modified Scat II HP Hovercraft George, Architect Last edited by kach22i; 10-22-2010 at 04:39 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Ossieblue.... The Euro height (A-B) is 108mm instead of 124mm in your drawing. (I don't know where the 124 came from, I've never seen that in any spec). If I'm at ~120mm, I'm lower than the Euro spec by ~12mm=~0.5inch.
my exact details: My dimension A = 11.75inch My dimension B = 7.0 inch A-B = 4.75inch = 120.7mm Height from ground to top of tire is ~24inch (tires are pretty worn) Height from ground to top of wheel well arch =26inch I've very confused by something else now. My tires are definitely 215/60R15s. However, when I measured the wheel rims, I got 16inch for the outer lip. Do you measure the wheel as shown by the red arrow or green arrow? If its the red then I have 15inch tires on 16inch wheels!! ![]() My bottom line is that I expected the gap between top of tire and wheel well to be less than the current 2 inches if my ride height is lower than the Euro spec. Do any of these dimensions explain why this is or is it normal. I'm not interested in going too far below spec because the steering effort becomes too much. I've already been there and done that and understand all the alignment implications and bump steer ..blah..blah..etc..etc... Would also like to know if I have 15 or 16inch wheels!?
__________________
81 -930 82 - Austin Mini 998 78 Mini 1275cc -totaled 83SC Euro w/77 3.0 Carerra Eng.--sold Several other daily drivers not worth mentioning... Last edited by jwakil; 10-22-2010 at 05:51 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|