![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
Hi guys,
Now that Clint has the rear spring plate bushings along with his front ones, does anybody know what the pros and cons are between RSR and ER polybronze stuff? ER seems to have been around for quite a while but I was reading about the adjusting bolt sometimes scraping the body after ER installation in the rear. Both are priced similarly (somewhat) but this winter coming up and my project list growing, I am just confused now... It used to be pretty clear, ER was the only one with a good product but these RSR products from Rebel Racing look awesome. Any input from somebody who has used both products? Also, what do you guys use for the trailing arm bushing when you do such upgrade? Thanks for any info!! David
__________________
David 1985 Black 930, K27 7006, Garretson Intercooler, Adj boost, TB: 23 - 31mm, bielstein sport shocks, ER polybronze bushings front and rear, ER monoball joints front and rear with offset camber plates, 935 X triangulated strut brace, raised spindles, racing bump steer kit 1981 Black 911sc (sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
The RSR rear bushings are so new that you will not find anyone with experience using them. I saw the first set being installed a few weeks ago. They use the same sort of bushing principle as the fronts though.
I know which I would use.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 2,497
|
I use the RSR in the front and they see track use primarily. They have performed great and they are not noisy which surprised me. My mechanic thought they were the nicest pieces he has seen in some time and will start using the RSR's when he can.
I wish the rears were around when I did my build!
__________________
'87 Carrera - 2400 lbs of Track Beast!! '88 Carrera Cab - Too nice for the track. '85 Targa - Salvage title that was not caught! |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
I'd love to see a comparison test on these two items.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,703
|
subscribed ...
I think the trailing arm goes through some twist with travel, the Rebel setup looks unable to absorb the twist, ER has some deflectable material that can take some movement. Right? Wrong? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 2,437
|
saw a set of the RSR's last week..
I am concerned about the SS part that get's JB welded in place then the material for the bushing looks to be glass filled...the glass would likely wear the SS down IMO and then what??? replace the SS part? do they sell that separate? you would have to "un-glue" it and then glue another one in place... IDK, I was wondering about them - plus thinking of making my own aluminum parts with Delrin bushings... anyone have a link to the RSR's
__________________
Ed M 86' Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
I would guess that the performance differences between the RSR and ER parts would be nearly impossible to measure. So many variables, especially in the rear suspension. The big differences will be in ease of installation, ability to be serviced, and service life.
Last edited by JP911; 10-23-2011 at 05:20 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
For those looking for the link to the RSR product, our host has the front ones and will most likely get the rear ones in a bit of time (as they just came out).
For now, here is the link to both directly from Rebel Racing Suspension1
__________________
David 1985 Black 930, K27 7006, Garretson Intercooler, Adj boost, TB: 23 - 31mm, bielstein sport shocks, ER polybronze bushings front and rear, ER monoball joints front and rear with offset camber plates, 935 X triangulated strut brace, raised spindles, racing bump steer kit 1981 Black 911sc (sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,703
|
Quote:
ER has a compliant piece and a grease fitting RR has no compliant piece (if I understand correctly) and has no grease fitting, but says will last as long as you own the car or replacement parts are available. My guess is the ER will ride with more comfort but the "more" may not be detectable, durability, hard to tell put it out there with temp. extremes, salt, dirt, sand/etc. for ten or twenty years and then see. This is the main issue IMO, but maybe for the usual customer, of this sort of thing, it is not a key issue. |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Quote:
Yes you could say it is a little crude. Certainly it makes adjusting camber and toe harder. But that is how it is designed.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Quote:
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,703
|
Quote:
Do we think the ER compliant part can be felt to be more comfortable than the RR solution? |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Paradigm Short Shifter
|
I just ordered a set of the rear ones a few days ago, and hopefully i will be doing the tear-down and rebuild of the whole car's suspension in november or december... We'll see...
I just can't wait to see the new parts, the fronts are so beautiful, these rears are gonna be awesome as well, i can feel it. Im so glad they finally came out. I've been waiting for their solution for a long time, and fortunately, my ability to totally redo the suspension was hampered and delayed enough to where i was able to hold off on going with a rear spring plate solution... michael |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,703
|
Quote:
It seems like one would want the bushing either ER or RR to be in the "neutural" or "relaxed" twist state when the plate is at or near the normal load position. Is that part of the design or install process? |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
The bushings are designed to keep the torsion tube and torsion bar co-axial. The spring plate will be twisted a little bit depending on ride height and camber/toe settings. There is no way to get every car to be in a no-twist position at static ride height. It does not even matter since every displacement out of static ride height will cause twist.
You want the torsion bar to be nice and straight.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,703
|
Quote:
Will be interesting to see how people like the RR bushings. I like the no maint. promise. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Lots of good info came out and the RSR are definitely sexy... but how about those using the Elephant Racing, any comments on how they hold up? How was the install? Do they live up to your expectations?
__________________
David 1985 Black 930, K27 7006, Garretson Intercooler, Adj boost, TB: 23 - 31mm, bielstein sport shocks, ER polybronze bushings front and rear, ER monoball joints front and rear with offset camber plates, 935 X triangulated strut brace, raised spindles, racing bump steer kit 1981 Black 911sc (sold) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
The ER Polybronze are fantastic, I have several years of racing on them and as long as they are installed properly and greased they will last a long time. No squeaks, perfectly smooth range of motion with no resistance, very little flex. Only part of my suspension I have changed are the monoball (trailing arm) bearings, a matter of replacing them every two seasons.
__________________
Gary R. |
||
![]() |
|