|
|
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
My engine seems loud
Ever since I transplanted the 3.0L in, my engine seems awfully loud. I've adjusted the valves twice, and redid the intake valves a third time, though I think I'm still hearing a bit of valve tick. But outside of that, it still sounds a bit like a big truck or something.
Have a listen - this is idle, 2000rpm, 3000rpm, 4000, then back to idle: engine - YouTube It's a 1982 US 3.0L with Weber carbs and original 1972 exhaust, though with a Bursch sport muffler that's maybe 4 or 5 years old (bought new). The distributor is from the SC, but recurved for mechanical advance and retard. Timing has been set, valves adjusted as I said, and carbs tuned last weekend.
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 7,799
|
I'll wait to see what the pelican experts have to say but to me, it sounds loud and rough (like on 5 cyl).
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
2K for idle is very high hear the valves not trying to be a a$$ but to me sounds low on oil
|
||
|
|
|
|
Burn the fire.
|
Are you sure you didn't install a 3.0L Type IV?
![]() I jest... Sure doesn't sound right. Check oil as noted above. Also pull the plugs and check the color to see if you have one or two not firing. Are your plug wires in correct order? Have you checked the mixture after switching to carbs? Made sure they are all synchronized & balanced?
__________________
[x] Working | [_] Broken: 2017 Victory Octane [x] Working | [_] Broken: 2005 Ram 1500 SLT w/5.7L Hemi "Drive it like you stole it." |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Idle is at 1000. I revved it to 2000, then 3 then 4 so you can hear the different sounds it's making.
I never thought about oil. What's the capacity for a 3.0L? What about when you factor in the 1972-only oil tank? Is the dipstick still going to be accurate?
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Plug wires are correct, double checked when I redid the intake valves last weekend. Carbs are synhced and balanced, and mixture set as per backing out the screw until the idle dips. I don't have an exhaust gas meter, so I can't check the mixture with any more detail than the screws.
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Discovery Bay, ca
Posts: 269
|
Here is what mine sounded like before I adjusted the valves and on the first start up after the install!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmVYNV01K-U&feature=youtu.be |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Oil should be "around" 13 qts I have a 81not sure on tank and dip stick but I'm sure they are close. Check with warm engine level ground and running. Should be between max and low mark on stick. Might be wrong but it really sounds low on oil.
My 2c |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
PS idle still a little high eight to eight fifty
|
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
I'm just not sure I can go with the dipstick, with the mismatched oil tank, plumbing and engine. I did check it when I changed the oil a few weeks ago, and the oil level was fine on the dipstick. 13 qts is MUCH higher than the standard 1972 capacity, which is 9-10.
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Ok I just listened to both clips again Jeff's sounds like it should yours not right. #1 check oil first things first. If goo go from there. I wouldn't push engine until you find issue
Ernie |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Will do tomorrow morning - thanks.
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Since you're using the '72 oil tank, is it possible the tank is not configured the same as the SC engine's tank, and therefore the oil pump is not correctly scavanging and pressuring correctly? I assume you have the 3.0 oil pressure sensor, do you see good oil pressure that increases with RPM?
It might help to plumb in a simple mechanical oil pressure gauge while you look at this... Chuck.H '89 TurboLookTarga, 339k miles |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Just checked the oil, and it's reading just above the high line on the dipstick. At idle, the oil level gauge is reading about 3/4. So at least by those measures the oil level is good.
But is the dipstick/gauge reliable with the engine and oil system mismatched? (I know the gauge isn't reliable at the best of times, though it always has been in the ballpark.) I don't have any additional oil cooling, just tank and hoses to/from the engine. When I last did an oil change a few weeks ago, I put about 7-8 quarts in, warmed it up, checked the level then added as necessary, which is how I've always done it, with both the 2.4L and the 3.0L. I'm using the pressure sensor that came with the 3.0L connected to my original 1972 dash gauge. I'm seeing what I believe is normal oil pressure on the gauge - low at idle, increasing with rpms to about 5-6 at 4000-4500 rpm, so just a bit more than 1 bar per 1000 rpms. FWIW, I've noticed significantly lower temperatures with the 3.0L. I used to see about 85-90 for regular driving, 100 on hot summer days, and as high as 120 on a hot day at the track. I haven't been to the track since I put the 3.0L in, but even on a hot summer day driving hard I haven't broken 85. I've always just assumed that the temp sender is sending a differently-calibrated signal to the dash gauge, and assumed the temperature was actually higher than that. I don't know if that sheds any extra light on this situation. I don't really want to overfill it then drive it around, but what's the consensus? Add another litre and see if it quiets down? 2 litres? 3?
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Ok, so my memory's not so good
. Warmed it up in the garage to check the oil level, then headed out. At 3800 rpm I was seeing 3 on the pressure gauge. At 5000 it was at 4. Those #s seem low to me, but again, they might be uncalibrated.Temp was 60, never got above that in 15 minutes on the highway, after having already warmed up in the garage. Outside temp today is 22 (72F). |
||
|
|
|
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
Quote:
Exterior noise can be increased with the older exhaust and carbs. Check this thread out on thick vs thin flange exhaust. Exhaust leaks from ALL flanges....
__________________
1981 911SC Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
Diss Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SC - (Aiken in the 'other' SC)
Posts: 5,022
|
You say that the engine is a transplant.
What kind intake and exhaust was on it before? If you went from CIS with a stock exhaust to webers with an early style dual header then it is going to be louder. Just webers can make a noise difference. Intake noise can be very loud on a car and part of the function of an air cleaner is to quiet the intake noise.
__________________
- "Speed kills! How fast do you want to go?" - anon. - "If More is better then Too Much is just right!!!" - Mad Mac Durgeloh -- Wayne - 87 Carrera coupe -> The pooch. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I have a 72 with an 81 3.0L that I built my self also. As far as the oil quantity is concerned it's the same no matter what engine is in the car. I have an oil cooler in the front fender but all that does is add oil quantity and you can't measure it anyway. The quantity in the tank reads the tank and engine volume. There is a temp sensitive valve in the line to the front cooler that doesn't open until around 190 deg F. Your oil on the stick should be around mid point between the two marks.
First the webers are noisier, I have those also. Your audio does sound like something clicking, hard to tell. Go find a childs stethoscope or even a length of garden hose and listen across the valve covers for anything ticking. That should eliminate the valve adjustment issue. However when I bought my 3.0L block it had three broken head studs so that could be an issue also if you didn't have the engine apart. Good Luck
__________________
Kent Olsen 72 911 SCT upgraded 3.0L McMinnville, Ore |
||
|
|
|
|
<insert witty title here>
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Broken head studs are a new thing to me, as it wasn't much of an issue with the 2.4s. I did have John Walker do a PPI on the engine before I bought it (seller was in Seattle) and I specifically asked him to check for broken head studs, and it was fine. Broken studs should be apparent when you remove the lower valve covers, right? i.e. pieces of stud loose or falling out. As far as I can tell inside the valve covers, everything looks fine.
__________________
Current: 1987 911 cabrio Past: 1972 911t 3.0, 1986 911, 1983 944, 1999 Boxster |
||||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
If John Walker did the PPI he probably did check the head studs, but they can be broken with nothing visual. All it takes is to put a socket on them with a light twist and if broken they will turn.
__________________
Kent Olsen 72 911 SCT upgraded 3.0L McMinnville, Ore |
||
|
|
|