Recommended Air Flow over the front A/C condenser

[SilberUrS6]

Originally Posted by Bob Kontak

I had to, "you know", to Penny from Lost in Space. I am as old as dirt.

Wow.

Good thing that wwest doesn't have any credibility any more. If anyone actually takes his advice, they probably deserve what they get.

[Ronnie's.930]

An interesting thing about wwest; he is very fond of belittling others for mistakes/misspeaks they have made (even when that person has acknowledged said mistake), yet he is so often wrong himself (though he never acknowledges his own errors)!

[wwest]

My creditability is only at risk if you are a half-brained idiot...

[wwest]

Originally Posted by Ronnie's.930

An interesting thing about wwest; he is very fond of belittling others for mistakes/misspeaks they have made (even when that person has acknowledged said mistake), yet he is so often wrong himself (though he never acknowledges his errors)!

Has anyone yet to PROVE me to be in error...??

[brads911sc]

WWEST... should we find and post all the times you contradict your own postings?

We dont need to PROVE anything. They are your ideas. You fail to prove them. Therefore we can assume that since you refuse to prove them that you know them to be false.

Originally Posted by wwest

Has anyone yet to PROVE me to be in error...??

[Bob Kontak]

Originally Posted by wwest

Has anyone yet to PROVE me to be in error...??

Now hold on there.

I was willing to spring for a "spansion" valve and have it tested for physical closure regarding the low/high pressure equalization post shut off argument.

You have stated that we are way beyond this issue.

How about this. I buy the expansion valve, send it to our friend in Canada and he tests it after his fifty-hundred month vacation. If I am wrong, I eat the $20. If you are wrong, you send me the coin.

Edit: Or are you a chicken?

[SilberUrS6]

Originally Posted by brads911sc

WWEST... should we find and post all the times you contradict your own postings?

We dont need to PROVE anything. They are your ideas. You fail to prove them. Therefore we can assume that since you refuse to prove them that you know them to be false.

Well, there's the offering of proof, and then there's the offering of proof that wwest believes.

Like his assinine idea that the high side pressure would go to 800psi (LMAO) and that somehow a 30-degree F temp rise of the rear condenser means that the pressure goes up more than ten percent somewhere other than the condenser.

These points are obvious to everyone but wwest. So yes, PROVEN wrong. With actual math and everything. But if the rest of the world accepts the proof, and wwest does not, then it's really not proven.

Hello, circular reasoning!

[tirwin]

Quote de Ronnie's.930

An interesting thing about wwest; he is very fond of belittling others for mistakes/misspeaks they have made (even when that person has acknowledged said mistake), yet he is so often wrong himself (though he never acknowledges his errors)!

Has anyone yet to PROVE me to be in error...??

Yes. The problem is you fail to acknowledge it. And when confronted by evidence and observations from others you reject their data.

Everyone appreciates a lively debate. If you weren't such a Richard about everything by hurling insults and allegations you might find that people might actually respect your ideas. As it stands right now, it looks to me like you've dug yourself a nice little hole in the respect department.

[Bob Kontak]

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6

But if the rest of the world accepts the proof, and wwest does not, then it's really not proven.

I cannot comment on this perfectly logical statement for above stated restraints.

[sacoffee]

This reminds me of the days when I had an LS1 and the pecker size discussions went on and on ... But at least those were about performance debates. This asinine stuff is about a friggin air conditioner.

wwest is a troll .. This is his only entertainment, he enjoys this stuff and you all play into his hands.

[Bob Kontak]

Originally Posted by sacoffee

This is his only entertainment, he enjoys this stuff and you all play into his hands.

I cannot comment on this perfectly logical statement for above stated restraints.

[Ronnie's.930]

Originally Posted by wwest

Has anyone yet to PROVE me to be in error...??

Yes indeed! You made a statement in one of Reid's infomercial threads that Porsche made improvements to engine cooling with the 964 - proof was offered that your statement was false, and that in fact, the 964 gave away considerable cooling efficiency in order to reduce noise emissions (curved blade fan which Porsche determined moves much less air, and under engine, sound deadening panels which retain heat).

[Ronnie's.930]

Originally Posted by sacoffee

This reminds me of the days when I had an LS1 and the pecker size discussions went on and on ... But at least those were about performance debates. This asinine stuff is about a friggin air conditioner.

wwest is a troll .. This is his only entertainment, he enjoys this stuff and you all play into his hands.

And apparently, you have as well . . .

[friendly]

@sacoffee--I never knew what a troll was until I tried to learn about my A/C on this forum. First, I Googled the term. Then, I read wwest and KelogGes on the forum. Then I placed both of them on my "Ignore list". Then I learned what an "enabler" is by watching people feed and quote the troll.
D@MN!!!

[sacoffee]

Originally Posted by Ronnie's.930

And apparently, you have as well . . .

... the prosecution rests

[friendly]

This is so sad...

[Ronnie's.930]

Originally Posted by friendly

@sacoffee--I never knew what a troll was until I tried to learn about my A/C on this forum. First, I Googled the term. Then, I read wwest and KelogGes on the forum. Then I placed both of them on my "Ignore list". Then I learned what an "enabler" is by watching people feed and quote the troll.
D@MN!!!

So in other words, you've learned quite a bit from reading the a/c threads - good deal!

[friendly]

I have gone to Rennlist and its the same thing there. Post a legitimate question, get a troll. Pretty soon nobody follows the post.
Too many enablers and it only takes one. This is how trolls get their rocks off!
DUH!!!

[wwest]

Originally Posted by Bob Kontak

Now hold on there.

I was willing to spring for a "spansion" valve and have it tested for physical closure regarding the low/high pressure equalization post shut off argument.

You have stated that we are way beyond this issue.

How about this. I buy the expansion valve, send it to our friend in Canada and he tests it after his fifty-hundred month vacation. If I am wrong, I eat the $20. If you are wrong, you send me the coin.

Edit: Or are you a chicken?

One better, if the TXV doesn't close fully in the required conditions I'll sent you $200.00.

But...What's to prevent it from fully closing if the conditions require a full closure, say the evaporator core already being a block of ice.

[Bob Kontak]

Originally Posted by friendly

@sacoffee--I never knew what a troll was until I tried to learn about my A/C on this forum. First, I Googled the term. Then, I read wwest and KelogGes on the forum. Then I placed both of them on my "Ignore list". Then I learned what an "enabler" is by watching people feed and quote the troll.
D@MN!!!

-
You have 26 posts. One recommends putting Armor-All on engine hoses, another tells someone there are two lights in some compartment (barn find). That is your total contribution to the forum. The absolute and complete summary of your toil regarding helping fellow Porsche owners.

You want us to assume that you understand what is going thru our heads regarding some off the wall loser that pisses on and confuses people that ask legitimate questions?. Are you really certain you are ready to guide us given your investment here?