![]() |
Quote:
Yes, I did. About 12 inches worth. I could have got away with less, but I wanted the transition to be very gradual. I could run 225/45s without problem, IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Setting aside equipment used to take alignment readings, here's tool list:
19mm sockets & wrenches - breaker bar, torque etc . . . 8mm Allen Socket for your torque wrench 12mm Allen wrench Anything missing? Thanks for link Ian. |
One thing I found to be very important is the level of the floor. It needs to be PERFECTLY level from side to side where the tires sit. I used thin pieces of plywood under my tires to shim up my floor. You need to be within 1/16" of level from side to side or your camber measurements will be off. It is surprising how uneven most slabs are.
|
Quote:
225/45/16 front, 245/45/16 rear on 8's and 9's. http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/...psa1960216.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Husky 9 in. Digital Level-THD9403 at The Home Depot |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Home Depot $40 http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1411732724.jpg Harbor Freight $22 http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1411732849.jpg |
Quote:
Wheels are 951 fuchs @ 16X8 ET23, toyo r888 tires. I have no spacers on the front, approximately 1.5 degrees neg camber (max with stock parts) , no AC lines, and rolled fenders. The above mentioned mods are definitely more than the minimum required to fit without rubbing. |
Went back to 205 / 50 front and 245 / 45 rears---guys at Tires Plus were very accommodating. Working longer than expected on AC. When done with that... am onto alignment.
|
My opinion...
I'd sell the 9's, buy a set of 7's and run 205/225 summer tires in a good brand. I think you'll find those tires to be junk. The car will drive a lot better and that's more important than how it looks sitting still, right? JR |
Quote:
|
I thought you had 8's and 9's. If you have '7's and '9's, my advice would be to swap the 9's for a set of 8's.
For me, it's less about how it looks than how it works. Larger wheels have a downside, which is weight and (usually) a higher moment of inertia. Makes the car slower... I actually run 7&8x15, which is lighter yet. JR |
Quote:
Am running 8s and 9s x 16. |
"Under C" measures front and rear. Have done a few times to ensure consistent reads.
Front http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1414002679.jpg .103" ...just shy of 1/8" total toe out. Photos of fronts taken some months ago---well before I changed them out. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1414001128.jpg Rear http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1414002707.jpg .061" ...about 1/16" total toe in. Side to side wear is best I've seen from my rears ever. Both tires are same as this. (Too high pressure.) http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1414001306.jpg Under C method is very quick but it leaves me questioning which, if a side, is to be adjusted? Or is it standard procedure to adjust both sides? Does string method tell which side to adjust? |
Quote:
Otherwise adjust to straighten the wheel. You should do camber before toe. Actually, Rideheight, cornerbalance, camber and toe are all inter related. Many good threads on this forum for DIY alignments. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website