|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
-cage, stripped to a massive level, reinforcements, oil cooler modifications, engine swap, seat modifications......so on...so forth I really cant break even or come ahead doing a new car. :/ |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
If it is a GT2/3 or a turbo it will bolt on to the engine. The normal 996 gearbox has a completely different bolt pattern.
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Like what?
I'm 95% done with my conversion, 3.6+g50 into a 69.
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
|
|
|
|
ALEX P
|
What more info were you after? There is a fairly comprehensive kit of parts that outlines the costs involved - Sadly it was just too much $$$ for me so I have just limped on with my tired 915 since and have been concentrating on fixing the bodywork instead.
There's a thread on here that I really like and am mulling over as a good 'cost' option to a better gearbox that the 915. I know everyone who has a nice 915 says when they're good they're really good BUT they do have their limitations and you cannot abuse/rush them without causing damage and they are very expensive on parts. Subaru Impreza gearboxes on the other hand are modern, cheap-ish and two a penny........ Subaru transmission in place of a 915 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sunny buffalo
Posts: 1,011
|
Our '87 930 has a G50 transplant by a prior owner, no idea how much, how many headaches, ... but it rocks for sure.
I like it much better than the 915 in our '75 911S |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 3,070
|
G50 is an amazing upgrade! Worth 8-10K? Shoot, probably not but I was mating mine with a monster turbo motor so I didn't have a choice. I have never looked back! I did not cut the torsion tube but I did shorten the bell housing via California Motor Sports.
__________________
'67 911S '69 911S, '70 911ST '73 911T Targa Signal Yellow '78 911SC backdate |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
My biggest questions-
1 has anyone figured out why some cars need the body cut and others don't? 2 what is the cost in today's terms? 3 with a 3.6 swap- can a 915 be built up to Handel the power long term (on a track) or is the g50 the ticket I called Patrick motorsports to see what they would charge (they carry all parts and transmissions) to drop off the car and have them do the swap and provide all parts. Respectfully they were $19,000-21,000 in and out. I can do the work myself- I more wanted a base shop price. Any ideas |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
2. depends on you skills, luck with finding parts etc, but I think you can do it for 6-7000. 3. Probably but that ain't cheap either, but a lot easier.
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
The SBH G50 will fit any G-model, but you may have to cut a little out of the torsion tube shell. Especially when installing into a non-tubo body. As I have come to understand, the turbo bodies have a little extra spacing from the tunnel to the rear motor mounts. This measurement varies a little bit from mode to model within the G model range.
I put a G50-00 SBH (-shortened 28mm) into mine (911SC), and had to cut out some materials from the tube shell, (Gained about 10mm), and move the entire engine/tranny assembly rearward by about 15mm. (I Just bent the cross member for the engine mount slightly) Be prepared for a noisier transmission though. Especially if you, like me, have the SBH together with a lightweight clutch package. Vibrations from the engine flywheel becomes very audible in the G50, especially at low revs. Also, as others have mentioned, it's pricey. Otherwise, it is a nice upgrade. If I had a stock 3.6 NA engine, I wouldn't want to install the G50. It is cheaper to strengthen and service the 915. Many people regularly use 915 on track with a 3.6 engine. But if you go with a turbo, or go near 300 and above horsepower, you may want to think about putting in the G50 for long therm dependability. I put in the G50 so I can really "abuse" the car. I would find it annoying not to be able to dump the clutch once in a while. And the shifter improvments alone is pretty nice. No more tricky shifts.
__________________
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/dto_garage.php?do=viewvehicle&vehicle_id=16659 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
We are using a race built 915 with our 3.8L engine. We have considered swapping out for a G50 but the cost just doesn't justify the swap. CMS in Lake Havasu, AZ did a rebuild and upgrade to the race built 915 that came with the race car and 3.2L engine. https://californiamotorsports.net/ We broke a pinon tooth in the 3 year old box after installing the 3.8L and that's why we took it to CMS. They replaced the R/P, 3rd gear set, syncros, sliders, misc, bell housing, LSD clutches, side plate upgraded to Turbo w/Turbo bearing - - all for $8K We also use a trans cooler for racing - simple pump and coil arrangement - but this is a race car and lives most of its life at 5-7K RPM They are very helpful if you call and talk with them - lots of Porsche transmission experience. We are very satisfied with their work. This is Sean (the CMS owner's son) and behind him on the bench is a real 935 transmission . . . Regards,
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxster S Cobalt Blue/Blk/Blk Crew Chief for Son's 1978 Porsche 911SC Original Porsche Mocha Brown 3.8L NASA race car Previous Porsches: 1958 356 Red Coupe - 1972 914 Blue -1972 911T Coupe Aubergine Last edited by Sboxin; 08-05-2016 at 11:29 AM.. Reason: correction |
||
|
|
|
|
porsher
|
Quote:
We all have different preferences, skills and equipment. For example I did not like the idea of bending the engine cross member but others are happy with that. I did not mind shaving the torsion tube, but later came to find it was not such a great decision.
__________________
86 911 Race Car, with a few 993 bits in the boiler room 79 928 Race Car 88 928 Becoming a Race Car |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Newport Beach CA
Posts: 1,873
|
Rebuild the 915 and use WEVO upgrades. Works fine. The G50 while nice is overkill.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Eng-o-neer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,108
|
Sounds like it'd be cheaper to cut out the seats and install a Cayman drivetrain...
If I could spend $10k and magically have a G50 in my '84 coupe, I would. Hell, I think that's the market difference anyway. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 3,070
|
I think everyone assumes you need to cut the torsion bar tube or remove it all together and install coil-overs.
This is not the case! Mine is done on an SC chassis. I did not cut the torsion tube. I did do the short bell housing conversion by CMS. And, with a very careful installation, it will move the engine backwards in the car by almost 3/4". I don't think there's any way around this without cutting the torsion tube. However, you can easily modify (not bend) the motor mount bar so the motor will bolt right in. It does not change the handling of the car. The axles and everything else still work just fine. $10K would be on the cheap side. 20K is the high side. Low teens is probably realistic for a DIY.
__________________
'67 911S '69 911S, '70 911ST '73 911T Targa Signal Yellow '78 911SC backdate |
||
|
|
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 5,887
|
Who wants to move the engine further back in the car? Why bother with the conversion if you are going to take this negative step to do so??
__________________
Scott Winders PCA GT3 #3 2021 & 2022 PCA GT3 National Champion 2021 & 2022 PCA West Coast Series GT3 Champion |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 3,070
|
In my case, I didn't have a choice. I had to convert to a G50 and I wasn't going to cut my torsion tube.
__________________
'67 911S '69 911S, '70 911ST '73 911T Targa Signal Yellow '78 911SC backdate |
||
|
|
|
|
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,563
|
Need a pet leprechaun to do it for that price.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
|
|
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 5,887
|
You didn't HAVE to do anything.......
__________________
Scott Winders PCA GT3 #3 2021 & 2022 PCA GT3 National Champion 2021 & 2022 PCA West Coast Series GT3 Champion |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 3,070
|
591hp said I HAD to do something. The 915 would have been a ticking time bomb
__________________
'67 911S '69 911S, '70 911ST '73 911T Targa Signal Yellow '78 911SC backdate |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I got the G50 here on pelican for 3500 and I don't think I have paid more than 1500-2000 for the rest of the parts.
It's not a short bellhousing, I cut the torsion tube instead because I have coilovers. The engine looks to be in the original position, if I choose to in the future I could shorten it and move the engine forward. Found an RS flywheel second hand, but unused. Got a free slave cylinder, free clutch plate (well not free, I've probably done something in the past to get them). Bought guide tube and bearing new. The shifter I made from a 944 one, if ut turns out as good as I think I'll post something about it. Clutching generic copper fuel line. Master cylinder, found used, made a linkage in the foot well, that I need to redesign in the future. So depends on luck and skills.... |
||
|
|
|