![]() |
Thanks, Griff. I barely understand this stuff on a good day. When I charge my system, both the high and low pressures rise together. It seems in the past when I have overcharged it, the low side pressure would go up into the 40-45 PSI range. I am not arguing, I just wish I understood.
Dave |
If it is of any help, my Retroaire system takes about 18 - 20 oz to get pressures in the range....
Dennis |
Quote:
I do have one question - this is full-on noob ignorance. To assess the low side pressure, is the blue valve turned off to negate the 70 or so lbs pressure from the 30 lb tank? |
Nathan, looking good, and yes, I would consider your pressure a bit high for the ambient conditions (I would defer to Griff for anything on that subject, however).
Bob, yes, you have to stop the flow of refrigerant from the tank/bottle to get an accurate, lowside pressure reading - the number is way different with the tap open versus closed. |
Nathan, looks like you got some cold!
Enjoy it and if it were a bit over so what, it can't be that far off optimal. IMO Even if you wanted to take some out how would you measure it? Quote:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1437768383.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1437768417.jpg |
Just did mine, low pressure was 45, high was 240....temperature at vent after a short drive was 40F. Ambient 85 degrees.
Total put in was 20 oz as per can weight, I suspect I have about 19 oz in the system what with leakage/stuff in hose etc. Dennis |
Just for the sake of comparison, and possibly added confusion :D, at about 92-95 ambient, I had 30 lowside, 220 highside and vent temp of 27-28 degrees. This was when I re-charged about two weeks ago. I got the same results when I charged in almost identical temps last summer.
|
How much did put in Ronnie?
|
George, no idea on the amount of refrigerant - I didn't weigh the tank. I've never charged any vehicle via weight/amount of refrigerant (never even look that info up), but just use the vent temp + pressures method. I'm not saying that is how it should be done, but it's always worked for me.
|
Ronnie, do you use Griff's formula for your pressures based on ambient T?
|
The problem with vent temps as a yardstick is, as you cabin cools off, the vent temp falls whether your ac is cooling it more, or less. And what if some other variable changes?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chasing a moving target, it seems to me. Absent: charge, measure, turn off A/C, wait for IAT to rise back to OAT, repeat ad infinitum... |
Quote:
And regarding the vent temp yardstick - I always try to determine what is the lowest vent temperature the system is capable of delivering (takes experimentation & experience, obviously) and try to synchronize that with the pressures I am looking for - no changing variables that way, as far as I see it, buttofcourse (that's for Bob, buttofcourse). :) Also, Griff explained to me behind the scenes why it is a good idea to record refrigerant weight/amounts added - good reference and troubleshooting data to have for future charging - so I will do that from this point forward. |
Quote:
I'll bet it's sharp as a pin. Let's see.....like a .........pin head. Kinda catchy. Ronnie is a pinhead. Yeah. Heh heh. A pinhead. |
Quote:
In order to see the coldest temps the system is capable to delivering, the cabin air has to be cooled (the evaporator's incoming air) via re-circulation mode - that does not take as long as you would think if the vehicle is in the shade and has not been pre-heat soaked when you are charging. Once the coldest possible temps are reached, (the thermostat comes in to play here), you note the pressures and verify that they are in your target range - if they are, then you can consider it a success, and if they are not, it's time to start troubleshooting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I thought you to be the expert in these matters. But, a theory, if I may... Orifice tube systems have very narrow range of refrigerant charge. With the charge just a tad low and the evaporator tends to freeze up. TXV systems, on the other hand, due to having evaporator "condition" feedback, have a much wider range of fill levels for which they will maintain control and prevent the evaporator "charge" from reaching the freeze up zone. But, as Charlie suggests, what if you ever so slowly charge the system just barely short of the charge level wherein the TXV is in its range of control? You then have successfully "simulated" an orifice tube system with a low refrigerant charge. Eureka! You now have a system with the lowest possible vent temperatures. But with a strong tendency to freeze up. But, shouldn't the thermostatic capillary control switch prevent that? Not if you calibrate it in accordance with Charlie's "seeming" parameters. I can't be certain but it appears to me that Charlie's set points for the capillary sensor thermostatic switch will put the average evaporator temperature in the sub-freezing zone. How else do you get our systems to produce sub-freezing vent outflow absent somehow over-riding BOTH control aspects..?? How do you prevent freeze ups? Pay close attention to the vent outflow air volume, or live in a very dry climate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Perhaps Charlie, by charging "just so", has figured out a method to simulate an orifice tube system. TXV outside its range of control, capillary thermostat system not capable of detecting freeze up onset. Any other theories as to how Charlie's method gets you su-freezing vent temperature my ears are wide open. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website