Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,682
Huge difference in 3.0 and 3.2?

Posting this for a friend cause he's lookingI drive a 3.0 in a 911 for 5500. but have access to an 87 3.2 engine for 7500.00 so here's my question, is there a huge difference between an early 3.0 and a 3.2 engine? I've never driver a 3.2 so I can't say.

Seat of the pants feel a big difference?

Also longevity issues. What engine would you keep and why??

Also what do u think a good running 3.0 is worth? And also values of same mileage 3.2? 140k

Is it worth the cost to change engines? Thanks in advance. Mark

Old 09-18-2015, 02:30 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
wayner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: I live on the road, I just stay here sometimes...
Posts: 7,104
Ive been told the 3.o is more bulletproof. 3.2s get leaky valve seals but then I've heard of 3.0 head studs so not really sure

A 3.0 is a short stroke motor and loves to rev. A 3.2 has a long stroke crank but it has displacement and better flowing heads going for it.

I'd lee the 3.0 and put the extra money into a future rebuild for the price of that 3.2
__________________
73 RSR replica (soon for sale)
SOLD - 928 5 speed with phone dials and Pasha seats
SOLD - 914 wide body hot rod
My 73RSR build http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/893954-saving-73-crusher-again.html

Last edited by wayner; 09-18-2015 at 05:44 PM..
Old 09-18-2015, 02:34 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Cevan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Western Mass
Posts: 418
One big difference is the FI. CIS on the 3.0 vs Motronic on the 3.2.
__________________
1986 Carrera coupe - black on black
1972 CB500/4
Old 09-18-2015, 02:54 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
War Vet
 
matt930s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 4,706
Garage
It isn't worth a swap to me. The 3.2 has a bit more "punch", but not night and day...

MattR
Old 09-18-2015, 02:58 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,682
Thx for all the comments. I know it's asking for the moon but does anyone have both and can compare back to back in performance?

Do the prices seem to be low since the increase in values?

Wayner. Check your post about ss and long stroke. Is it accurate? Think u meant 3.0 is ss? Thx
Old 09-18-2015, 03:19 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,492
40 horses helps on the3.2 for seat of the pants feel.
Both are respectable with good longevity.
$7500 for a 3.2 is core value if it's complete
Bruce
Old 09-18-2015, 03:42 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,295
Garage
I've had both but not in the same car. I rebuilt both, (valve guides in the 3.2, head studs in the 3.0) the 3.2 to eurospec with 964 cams and the already eurospec 3.0 with 964 cams and SSI / sport muffler.
I prefer the revvier feel of my 3.0, although it was a euro motor so more hp to begin with, plus it has euro gearing which makes a big difference, and the euro 3.0 car feels much lighter.

either way both motors respond to some better cams and SSIs, plus a few bits of suspension jewellery but I'd Stick with the 3.0 and put the spare 2k for the mods I mentioned
Old 09-18-2015, 03:47 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Fleabit peanut monkey
 
Bob Kontak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Posts: 20,707
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt930s View Post
It isn't worth a swap to me. The 3.2 has a bit more "punch", but not night and day...
If you compare an early US 3.0 to a ROW 3.2 you are talking 50HP. 180 VS 231.

Just do some research. It is worth your time.
__________________
1981 911SC Targa
Old 09-18-2015, 03:56 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 501
The 3.2 engine can be upgraded with a Motronic chip replacement from Steve Wong; I don't think the 3.0 is compatible. With the chip and exhaust upgrade, my car makes 241 crank HP which is a fair amount more than the stock 3.0. Chip and exhaust is not much $$ in the scheme of things.
Old 09-18-2015, 05:37 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
wayner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: I live on the road, I just stay here sometimes...
Posts: 7,104
Thanks. Fixed it

Yes 3.0 is ss


Btw you can build an ss 3.2 out of a 3.0
__________________
73 RSR replica (soon for sale)
SOLD - 928 5 speed with phone dials and Pasha seats
SOLD - 914 wide body hot rod
My 73RSR build http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/893954-saving-73-crusher-again.html

Last edited by wayner; 09-19-2015 at 09:24 AM..
Old 09-18-2015, 05:43 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered
 
Tincanguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Woodinville WA
Posts: 61
Garage
Had a 78 Targa with SSIs that felt real strong. It was totaled, and replaced with a stock 88 Targa. My first reaction was, "Wow, this really feels like a slug compared to my 3.0" - partly due to the increased weight. After removing the cat, and installing a SW chip (It already had a Monty muffler) it was transformed. Dynoed out at 241 RWHP. Revs nicely as I had a light weight pressure plate and a lightened flywheel installed. SCs are nice but I wouldn't trade my Carrera for one.
__________________
1988 Carrera Targa, Guard's Red
1959 356A - long gone
1960 356B - long gone
1978 SC Targa, GP White - Accident - Totaled 2006 (T-boned by a nut on drugs)
2003 VW V6 Passat Wagon
Old 09-18-2015, 06:31 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by sm70911 View Post
I've had both but not in the same car. I rebuilt both, (valve guides in the 3.2, head studs in the 3.0) the 3.2 to eurospec with 964 cams and the already eurospec 3.0 with 964 cams and SSI / sport muffler.
I prefer the revvier feel of my 3.0, although it was a euro motor so more hp to begin with, plus it has euro gearing which makes a big difference, and the euro 3.0 car feels much lighter.

either way both motors respond to some better cams and SSIs, plus a few bits of suspension jewellery but I'd Stick with the 3.0 and put the spare 2k for the mods I mentioned
On the 964 cams... Did u lose any noticeable torque on the low end with 3.2? I'm thinking about a cam swap with 964s or a tad hotter but don't want to lose low end torque on a street car
Old 09-18-2015, 06:53 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
 
Still here
 
pmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,056
Garage
The Motronic system is a more refined and responsive system. The 3.2 runs like the modern engine it is compared to the raw nature of the 3.0 mechanical air fuel control in the CIS. The 3.0 torque seems to max out sooner at a lower rpm than the 3.2 so performance wise, the 3.2 wins IMO.

Longevity , I believe they are comparable.

Last edited by pmax; 09-19-2015 at 09:35 AM..
Old 09-18-2015, 07:48 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Registered
 
sugarwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 9,011
Garage
Best seat of the pants upgrade is knowing how to drive. Does your friend shift at 5500 ? A 3.0 shifted at 5500 and properly downshifted to never be below 4000 will blow the doors off a 3.2 that is driven like a commuter car.
__________________
1986 Bosch Icon Wipers coupe.
Old 09-18-2015, 08:06 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
non-whiner
 
mreid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Slightly right of center
Posts: 5,235
There is no replacement for displacement.

Except: better cams, a lighter car, improved exhaust, better driver, better tires, better induction, etc.
__________________
"Too much is just enough."
Old 09-19-2015, 05:22 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #15 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,043
motronic modern
CIS OLD
Old 09-19-2015, 06:53 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #16 (permalink)
gearhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,539
3.2 all day long.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee
2009 Outback XT
2008 Cayman S shop test Mule
1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000
Old 09-19-2015, 06:58 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #17 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Marietta, Ga (Atlanta)
Posts: 2,970
Many years ago, I got so fed up with the 3.0 and that piece of crap CIS system in my '80SC I had to upgrade. With all the WURs,AARs, and other junk that were required for emission regs, plus blown up air boxes, I had had it!

I found a nice 3.2 and did the swap. Loved the reliability of a no problem motor, but was quite underwhelmed by the incremental power increase. I drove it for about a year with the 3.2, and then a low mileage 3.6 fell in my lap. Eureka, I had found the holy grail! Given that I had already done most all the conversion work to a DME system, the 3.6 replacement was a piece of cake. Turned the car into a rocket!

To sum it up, the 3.2 upgrade makes for a more drivable, trouble free long term experience, but don't expect a dramatic seat of the pants difference.
That takes a 3.6!!
__________________
'80SC Widebody 3.6 transplant Anthracite "The Rocket"
Long gone but still miss them all:
'77 911 Targa, '72 BMW 3.0CS Coupe(finest car I ever had!)
'71 911T Coupe White, '70 911T Coupe Blue
'68 911 Coupe Orange, '68 911L Soft Window Targa
Old 09-19-2015, 09:22 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #18 (permalink)
Registered
 
wayner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: I live on the road, I just stay here sometimes...
Posts: 7,104
My 3.0 is on carbs with cams

I shift at 7 and above 5
Gobs of power in a light car

My fiend who drives a 72T on carbs was blown away by how much torque my 3.0 had at 2500 rpm

I suppose it is all relative

But, think of it this way:
A 3.2 has betiful large ports. T also has added displacement. There is a lot there to take advantage of from the factory vs what you would pay to massage a 3.0
__________________
73 RSR replica (soon for sale)
SOLD - 928 5 speed with phone dials and Pasha seats
SOLD - 914 wide body hot rod
My 73RSR build http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/893954-saving-73-crusher-again.html

Last edited by wayner; 09-19-2015 at 11:58 AM..
Old 09-19-2015, 09:28 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #19 (permalink)
Troll Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: on the river
Posts: 4,731
Garage
My rebuilt 3.0 has bigger pistons, different cam, euro fuel delivery...it's a rock solid, upgraded, 78SC sleeper hot rod.
My son's 88 Carrera 3.2 has been lightened, chipped and rebuilt. It will blow the living doors off my 3.0 all day long. That car is just FAST!

__________________
1978 SC Coupe, Gris Argent Metallic Silver
1988 FJ62 Blue/Gray
2020 M2 CS
Old 09-19-2015, 12:23 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #20 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:09 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.