![]() |
|
|
|
cycling has-been
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 7,238
|
Matching rear calper to a front 'S'.
Anyone know of a rear caliper that would pair well with front 'S' calipers.
Must be alloy. Bust be direct bolt-in to the 3" rear spacing. (no adapters) Must fit inside 14" Fuchs. PMB has a Brembo on it's website that fits the criteria, but I'm not sure whether their 48MM pistons would complement, or detract, from the S performance in regards to the resulting bias. Any thoughts? Thanks Bill K
__________________
73 911T MFI, 76 912E, 77 Turbo Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
48 mm is the size of the pistons in the front S calipers, so your bias will be way off.
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: napier, new zealand
Posts: 33
|
|||
![]() |
|
cycling has-been
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 7,238
|
Thanks guys.
wirihana - I did talk to PBM regarding the LWB calipers, and there are no plans for reinstatement. Story of my life. Let me know if you ever want to sell yours. Bill V, what master cylinder would you recommend with the S and stock M in the rear? Thanks again, Bill K
__________________
73 911T MFI, 76 912E, 77 Turbo Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
cycling has-been
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 7,238
|
Bill V - what m/c would you recommend for my application (S+M)?
Are you still of the opinion that the 23mm is a leg buster? Thanks Bill K
__________________
73 911T MFI, 76 912E, 77 Turbo Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
I replaced the front "M" calipers on my 72 with "SC" calipers. About a 20% increase in swept area and they bolt on. Still have "M's" in the rear. I do have drilled/slotted disc's. My car only weighs 2100 lbs so that helps and I run 205X50X15 tires.
__________________
Kent Olsen 72 911 SCT upgraded 3.0L McMinnville, Ore |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Yes, it takes a lot of leg compared to a regular 19mm m/c I think that there is a 20.6mm m/c from a VW Corrado that may also work for this application, but have never actually used one. This would be a nice compromise size. For non boosted cars w/ M front, S or either of the A's and M rear a 19 will be the best choice for most drivers most of the time. For boosted cars it's less clear. The 2 choices are 20.6 or 20.3, both work and the boost takes a lot of the pain out of using the bigger m/c. The advantage of a bigger m/c is better ability to modulate the brakes and less tendency to lock them. The disadvantage is the extra leg needed.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|