|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12
|
Uneven Rear Height
While am am at it, I have also noticed a driver's side sag in the rear height based on bumper measurements from the ground. It is off by 3/4". I recently installed new 140# springs from PP with the existing shocks (that are in good condition). The is no rust in the shock towers and the tires are identical. I know how to adjust the height in the front, what can I do to adjust out this 3/4" in the back?
RJS
__________________
rj smith |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Had you just done work to the car and had it jacked up? If so the rear gets all sorts of wierd. The only thing you can do is to roll it around (or better yet drive) for a bit and it should straigten things up. AFAIK there is no height adjustment to any one side of the rear of the 914, but I could be wrong.
-Chris
__________________
1973 1.7 Black, Blue, White, and Primer Looks great anyways!!! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Francisco Ca
Posts: 697
|
After I installed new springs and shocks, the rear was sitting uneven with the engine out. After the engine was put back in, it was fine. It probably just needs to settle.
__________________
1973 914 2.0 PCA Member GGRwww.pelicanparts.com/gallery/chrisreale/ www.914club.com |
||
|
|
|
|
914 Geek
|
Also, messing with the ride height adjustment in front will also affect the rear to some extent.
And make sure the springs are actually seated on the spring perches. --DD
__________________
Pelican Parts 914 Tech Support A few pics of my car: http://www.pelicanparts.com/gallery/Dave_Darling |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 438
|
Quote:
Mark S. '70 914-6 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,384
|
rather than using the bumper as your reference try the points at the wheel wells where the rocker panel covers meet. measure the two front points first. if you have a level concrete surface a carpenters framing square works great, much more accurate than a tape measure. if the problem is the front adjusters you may find the diagnal front side from the low back side is higher. these measurements can be more accurate with a full tank of fuel,spare tire in place, check the air pressure in the tires and get that correct, if you have a tire that is much different (low) it throws everything out of wack and the measurements mean nothing,start with an even field. write down the measurements, when you adjust start with 1/2 of the difference, bounce the car a couple of times and roll it back and forth a bit. this is not a 5 minute adjustment, take your time. if you want to get real nit picky have someone take the measurements while you are in the drivers seat. the question of overall balance is the key imho.
kevin Last edited by Kevin Powers; 11-24-2002 at 09:21 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
My car has always been 1/2" low on the rear drivers side. We had it up on a four point scale and it showed that corner to be off. I'm getting ready to rebuild my rear suspension and I plan to install new Bilstein shocks with adjustable perches for the springs so I will be able to corner balance the car and hopefully level out the rear.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,840
|
Drew,
before you buy your springs, you should look into the threaded coil over conversion that utilizes the 2.5 ID springs. This will give you a very precise adjustment and doesnt cost much more than buying the Welt springs. I run Eibach and H&R springs. The range for the 2.5 springs is much better than 140's or 180's. B |
||
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Brad, that's the way I was going to go. I plan to order them from Patrick Motorsports in AZ. I'm going to get the 175# 2.5" springs with new Bilsteins and perches in a package deal.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,840
|
Perfect. I use the 175's on our 4cyl cars at Thunderhill and Buttonwillow race tracks. Laguna and SearsP require a stiffer spring (200).
I use 250's and up on our sixes. B |
||
|
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Brad, I'm running a 6. I didn't want to go too stiff on the springs but maybe I'm making a mistake if I get the 175#. What would you suggest for a car that is mostly driven on the track but used for weekend road trips? I mostly run at Willow Springs. The track is more important than the street driving. Thanks for any advice.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,840
|
225's all the way. The 250's is what I run on a narrow body 3.0 9146 that sees the street once or twice a week and the track 2-3 times a month. Its very smooth on the street with the 250's and the roller bearing suspension (oh Bilsteins F+R)
I think the 225's will be a decent compromise. Our 3.0 car has everything in place, including a full cage tied in. B |
||
|
|
|
|
|
914 Geek
|
Drew, you might also consider supporting the BBS by getting your adjustable spring perch kit through Pelican.
--DD
__________________
Pelican Parts 914 Tech Support A few pics of my car: http://www.pelicanparts.com/gallery/Dave_Darling |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,840
|
Dave,
send us a link to the sales page for the perches. B |
||
|
|
|
|
914 Geek
|
They're not in the on-line catalog. (Unless they've been added since last I looked.) But that doesn't mean we don't carry them.
--DD
__________________
Pelican Parts 914 Tech Support A few pics of my car: http://www.pelicanparts.com/gallery/Dave_Darling |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 1,840
|
Ha ha.. that was my point. ChrisC informed us a few weeks back that the "racing" section hasnt been "installed" tell Don to get the on the stick.
B |
||
|
|
|