![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi,
This question is for 951 owners. Why was it that Porsche decided on mounting the turbo on the other side of the exhaust manifold? Besides creating alot of heat under the intake manifold, adding weight, all that excess plumming would add some lag to the turbo as well. Hope that some of you could shed some light on the reason behind the use of this set-up. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: CA
Posts: 555
|
![]()
for the massive kick in the ass turbo lag ?
due to the exahust being on the opposite side of the intake. As far as I can tell the head of a 951 isn't that diffrent than the NA. They would have had to have a new head and a new everything to move it to the other side. Matt |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 2,935
|
![]()
My guess goes along with LG's. A wee bit of lag is better than the cost of designing a considerably different head. There is not much space on the passenger side. These cars were expensive in those days. Redesign would have added considerably to an already expensive vehicle.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 9
|
![]() Quote:
The downside of this is the turbo lag issue that you mentioned. But hey, at least we don't have to replace the turbos all the time like the 930 owners have to. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Charlotte NC USA
Posts: 55
|
![]()
I agree with with the previous post it was moved to keep it away from the heat. Which also enabled it to produce more HP due to the denser air.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
![]()
Quoting from Michael Cotton's Porsche 924/944 book [pages 72-73]:
"By installing the turbocharger on the left side of the engine, that is on the opposite side to the exhaust, the gas entry temperature was reduced by about 90 degrees C, and the flow of normal coolant water around the turbine housing kept temperatures down to 170 degrees C, even at full load." -MAS |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |