Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 924/944/968 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-924-944-968-technical-forum/)
-   -   Component Weights (list) (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-924-944-968-technical-forum/799340-component-weights-list.html)

Volhv 03-02-2014 09:43 PM

Component Weights (list)
 
Weighed some of the components I've removed, so I'd be great to compile a list with all their weights. For those of us that are seeking to lighten the vehicle, this could prove useful.

I'll start.

(11 lbs) late NA 6 blade radiator fans + housing
(6 lbs) alternator/ac bracket
(17 lbs) late alternator
(4 lbs) rear wiper motor and arm
(19 lbs) upper rear seat
(1.5 lbs) hatch release motor

Gawernator 03-02-2014 11:01 PM

(155 lbs) Andrew - Driver

jhowell371 03-03-2014 06:55 AM

Great idea.

John_AZ 03-03-2014 07:05 AM

Recent NA swap.

Cast Iron exhaust headers ~ 20 pounds
OEM "tube" type headers ~10 pounds

9FF 03-03-2014 07:41 AM

Here's a good source for wheel weights: Porsche Rims Wheel Weight | Measurespeed

J1NX3D 03-03-2014 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John_AZ (Post 7941175)
Recent NA swap.

Cast Iron exhaust headers ~ 20 pounds
OEM "tube" type headers ~10 pounds

is this difference an early/late 944 thing?

John_AZ 03-03-2014 03:05 PM

Not that I am aware of ????

Both are factory. Fit is identical. All NA.

The light weight tube headers were OEM on my '87, I replaced with cast iron.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-924-944-968-technical-forum/798455-na-tube-exhaust-manifold-cracks.html

J_AZ

J1NX3D 03-03-2014 03:17 PM

interesting, thanks

16vCorey 03-03-2014 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J1NX3D (Post 7942145)
is this difference an early/late 944 thing?

Yep. Originally the '83-early '85 cars had cast iron manifolds, the '85.5-up had tubular. There's even a later version of the tubular that fixed the cracking issue.

flash968 03-03-2014 03:32 PM

i wonder what the difference is between that tube type and the one on the 968? they look identical in the PET. part numbers are really close too. in 10 years i've only heard of one 968 header cracking. why would they crack in the 944 but not in the 968?

v2rocket_aka944 03-03-2014 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 16vCorey (Post 7942217)
Yep. Originally the '83-early '85 cars had cast iron manifolds, the '85.5-up had tubular. There's even a later version of the tubular that fixed the cracking issue.

There was some change-over point in mid-85MY when they started using the tubular headers on early bodies...my car has them stock, along with late coolant sensor and a turbo-drain-equipped oil pan...but as a general rule yes it's early vs late.

16vCorey 03-04-2014 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by v2rocket_aka944 (Post 7942230)
There was some change-over point in mid-85MY when they started using the tubular headers on early bodies...my car has them stock, along with late coolant sensor and a turbo-drain-equipped oil pan...but as a general rule yes it's early vs late.

Right, but I think they revised them in '87 and welded them up differently, so the '85.5 and '86 are prone to crack, but the '87 (or maybe it's '88) and newer are not.

H.F.944 03-04-2014 10:37 PM

Here is another write-up, hope it could help.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1394004925.jpg

John_AZ 03-05-2014 03:23 AM

Henry, aka H.F.944,

Nice! Bookmarked.

J_AZ

sausagehacker 03-05-2014 09:00 AM

The sound deadening under the rear hatch carpet: ~10lbs?

16vCorey 03-05-2014 10:05 AM

20lbs if your hatch leaks!

Gawernator 03-16-2014 10:12 PM

lolol

Volhv 03-16-2014 10:18 PM

Anyone have a weight difference between the US vs Euro bumpers?
Hmmmm... chunky aluminum vs fiberglass. (or is it plastic?)

J1NX3D 03-17-2014 02:50 AM

they are a type of reinforced plastic. they are very light, but are quite strong. Your sunroof skin is made of similar stuff. I've had a few low impact hits on mine including a tire wall and a possum and it's done no damage except to the paint. I replaced my front bumper with an AIR 924 carrera GTS reproduction.

I forget how heavy it is but i can hold it outright in one hand with a straight arm comfortably for a good few minutes.

there is an in between aluminium bumper but Im unsure of the option code for it or why it was deemed necessary. to me its sticks out as very different from a normal RoW/euro front bumper and is similar to US bumpers.

this car lives a few hours south of me.
http://iforce.co.nz/i/qbo3et3f.nki.jpg

It sticks out more like a US bumper and it has much more pronounced bumperettes. I think they may be metal like US ones, not rubber like RoW ones. The lighting arrangement is identical to RoW bumpers but they are mounted cleanly to the bumper. On RoW bumpers they have a plastic frame that screws in over the top and the rubber bumperettes are screwed into the frames.

compare it to my cars old bumper on a similar angle
http://iforce.co.nz/i/hukfkf03.c4p.jpg

Volhv 03-17-2014 11:03 PM

Aha, I see.

That bumper on the maroon car looks identical to the US/Canada ones. Minus the bumperette and driving light.

I don't like how ridiculously square our bumpers are. The ROW ones fit much better since they taper as the go forward, and there's a cutout that matches the valance.

Our massive bumperettes are also rubber.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.