Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 944 Turbo and Turbo S


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
geoffbaltz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 328
Garage
To Delete or Not Delete Balance Shaft

My buddy and I are building a 3 Liter motor and still can't decide what to do with the factory balance shaft setup. We have spared no expense on this motor and will be running new JE pistons, Pauter rods, and have had extensive work done on the crank.

Everything is done and all the parts are in so we are at the stage of having the motor put together. With all of the changes to the internals of the motor, doesn't it make sense to delete the balance shaft setup?

I know Porsche designed it originally for harmonics and to counteract the stock internals. But now that the motor will be completely different on the inside, isn't the stock balance shaft setup not ideal at this point? I mean, if Porsche designed it for what they knew they were putting in the motor, aren't we now going to have a balance shaft setup that isn't ideal for the new guts?

Would appreciate some thoughts and insight.

Thanks.

__________________
Geoff Baltz - St. Louis Region PCA
Board Member/DE Chairman
PCA HPDE Instructor

Last edited by geoffbaltz; 10-19-2014 at 04:42 PM..
Old 10-19-2014, 04:12 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
gpr8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
FWIW I built my 3L using Mahle pistons and a FULLY lightened crank, Fully lightened flywheel, and KEP aluminum PP. Pauter rods etc.All reciprocating parts were balanced. IMO you need the balance shafts for a big 4 banger.
Old 10-19-2014, 05:30 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
geoffbaltz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 328
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpr8er View Post
FWIW I built my 3L using Mahle pistons and a FULLY lightened crank, Fully lightened flywheel, and KEP aluminum PP. Pauter rods etc.All reciprocating parts were balanced. IMO you need the balance shafts for a big 4 banger.
Thanks for the input. So do the balance shafts counteract the ignition of each cylinder and it doesn't matter what internals are? Is it a timing thing?
__________________
Geoff Baltz - St. Louis Region PCA
Board Member/DE Chairman
PCA HPDE Instructor
Old 10-19-2014, 05:39 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
winter-hater club member
 
nynor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: salt lake city, utah
Posts: 24,705
the balance shafts counteract, so to speak, the rotating mass of the rest of the engine to reduce vibration.
__________________
2000 Corvette - ????, 2007 Buell XB9R - Astrid, 1996 Discovery - Piglet, 2000 Forester

"COOL PRIUS!" - Nobody Ever
Old 10-19-2014, 05:51 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoffbaltz View Post
Thanks for the input. So do the balance shafts counteract the ignition of each cylinder and it doesn't matter what internals are? Is it a timing thing?
No, the 2nd-order harmonics is caused by the difference in swept-area of the crank-journal + big-end of the con-rods at the botttom of the stroke vs the top of the stroke. The area and distance moved will always be different regardless of stock vs. aftermarket parts or whether the parts are within 1gm or 0.001gm of each other. The only way to balance this difference without balance-shafts is with a flat-4 engine.

Last edited by DannoXYZ; 10-19-2014 at 08:00 PM..
Old 10-19-2014, 07:52 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
geoffbaltz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 328
Garage
Thanks Danno. Hope you are doing well. I knew one of you engineer types would chime in.



I just fix and drive these things.
__________________
Geoff Baltz - St. Louis Region PCA
Board Member/DE Chairman
PCA HPDE Instructor
Old 10-20-2014, 05:45 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 597
Garage
My thoughts...I would be inclined to put them in.
__________________
1988 944 turbo
Old 10-20-2014, 05:58 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Posts: 72
For Porsche to pay a licence fee for every set they fitted they probably explored every viable option. Fit them.
Old 10-20-2014, 08:29 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Ornery Bastard
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Sound
Posts: 2,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ View Post
The only way to balance this difference without balance-shafts is with a flat-4 engine.
And even then only if it's a boxer arrangement, and you'll still get a slight rocking couple because the "opposite" pistons are very slightly out of line with each other.

If it's a shared crankpin (180-degree V) flat-4, it won't be balanced at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_engine#Boxer_engines

For a good basic explanation of why an inline-4 needs balance shafts, check out this link: AutoZine Technical School - Engine
__________________
---------
Silver 1998 Volvo S70 T5 <- Daily (Anja)
Guards Red 1986 951 <- Seattle car (Gretchen)
White 1976 914 2.0 F.I. <- Prodigal car, traded away then brought back again (Lorelei)
Old 10-20-2014, 02:25 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
geoffbaltz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 328
Garage
AaronM



Thanks for the link. Good stuff on balance shaft setups. We are keeping them for sure. I see the light!
__________________
Geoff Baltz - St. Louis Region PCA
Board Member/DE Chairman
PCA HPDE Instructor
Old 10-20-2014, 04:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Porsche 944S Club Sport
 
guru944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NYC-Long Island, NY-USA
Posts: 990
Garage
Send a message via AIM to guru944
Thumbs up Crank Walk occurances without them..

Geoff;

By removing the balancing shafts you also increase the possibilty of crank shaft walk which would not only damage the thrust bearings but also wipe out your front crankshaft oil pump.
Any engine 2.0 or larger and spinning over 5000 rpm is prone to this.....regardless of power level. Besides they only consume 3-5hp max off the crank. Engine would eventually reach resonance and shake it self to death.... Honda, Mitsubishi, Toyota and Porsche have been uses them since 1980.
Later
__________________
Guru944
2006 955 Cayenne S Titanium Series - Marine Blue, 1987 Porsche 944S Club Sport.
1987 Buick Turbo-T Lightweight "Great White", +500HP, TA49 Turbo.
http://www.blackbirdmotorsports.com, 944/951/968, 911 and 955/957 Performance Solutions.
Thank you Lord, for your Loving Kindness, Tender Mercy, and Grace. Only You are Faithful.
Old 10-22-2014, 12:09 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF East Bay
Posts: 1,856
I remember JME recommends not removing the shafts. A lot of racecars without balance-shafts end up with cracked oil pickup tubes from the vibration. Even with the shafts, I'll lay down a brass fillet at the ends of the tube to smooth out the transitions.
Old 10-22-2014, 07:10 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
Registered
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,520
Garage
Something that I've also been considering and have come to the conclusion that we will keep running them. Had some massive vibration or harmonic issue last weekend which killed our car in the most important event this year. Very disappointing but stuff happens when you stress these motors. We do run the balance shafts on this motor but see what happens when something gets out of alignment! First the supplied dry sump pulley sheared in half. We machined a better version and replaced within hours and then the crank pulley sheared off the motor. Also created a 4" tear in a weld of the intake we made. May have all started at the rear of the car. Looking at building up a special 16v motor but we will almost certainly run balance shafts with this too.

This site is too hard to load pics on. Sorry.
__________________
Patrick

Youtube 333pg333

86 modified 951
Old 10-22-2014, 03:54 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Pete R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,331
Garage
My car had balance shaft leaks and I really wanted to delete them for simplicity. I was told that the only guys that delete them are racers who rebuild the motor every year. So leak repair it was.

__________________
1979 928 85 Euro 2v motor,S4 Brakes and suspension, 1988 951 street legal track car(sold)
Neon SRT4 track car
Old 10-22-2014, 04:51 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:28 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.