[fintstone]

Originally Posted by cockerpunk

it would be inaccurate to describe your post, without the context to what you are responding to.

ie if your post is defending a phrase or action, it does not need to contain that phrase or action as a direct quote in order for that to be your words, your point, and your post.

this is logic 101.

example:

Me: 2 + 2 = 4

you: no it doesn't!

me: so you dont think that 2 + 2 = 4?

you: i never said that, find a quote!!!!

me: i did, you said no it doesnt in reponse to my claim.

you: no you didnt! i never said that. why cant you find a quote eh?

Pretty sure my posts are clear and stand alone. You seem to be the only one that either cannot understand them or feel the need to reword them to suit your rather pathetic argument.

And no... your attempted analogy is not even remotely analogous. It is just a further attempt to make claims that I said/posted something I did not. To continue to spin to try to make anything you have posted relevant is a waste of time/bandwidth. The only accurate thing in your entire post is "2+2+4". I did not post anything in your post that you attribute to me and there is certainly no logic (on your part) involved.

Please stop making up words and attributing them to me. My position is clear (and not what you would like it to be).