The photo of the attractive lady is sourced from a german paper "BILD" which is a tabloid like the SUN or the Enquirer.
Pregnancy intimate piercings genitals - What can the naked scanner really see - News - Bild.de
On the BILD web page they reference the photo source being phtotaltof1online. Only problem is that BILD apparently manipulated the image. photoaltof1online is just a picture service where you can buy many other images of people, including this lady in tons of different poses. Lo and behold, here is the regular pic of the lady that was manipulated.
F1online - stock photo agency - CD: Body in 360° (Dominique Douieb), PhotoAlto
So, conclusion is that
the image of the attractive lady is NOT from a body scanner. This is also clearly the case because her HAIR is visible in the alleged body scanner image. Hair is transparent in those machines - see the image of the less attractive lady (she is the CEO of one of the major scanner companies BTW) That lady is not bald rather than her hair is transparent to the scanner just like a wool sweater would be.
I am not a blogger or a journalist and this took only 10 minutes to figure out. Sad what's going around the interwebs these days.
George