You guys are pretty pathetic. I have not posted since last night and I have been referenced/slammed about 10 times since. Silly been debated so thoroughly in absentia...well at least you did a lot of trash talk/name-calling....there really was no debate/rational argument.

You remind me of the guys you drive those stock (except the big wing and loud muffler) neons who always want to race a P-car. You leave the light and after you are several miles ahead and have stopped to order at the drive in...the finally drive past and slap each other on the back to celebrate their win! LOL

Mule's posts are mostly opinion or unproveable (either way) psuedo-facts. When he strays into fact-based territory, then he runs the risk of fact checking.

Fint - where's your dedication? You gotta post morning, noon and night. :D

I haven't played in the OT area before, so Mule is new to me. :) All I've seen him do is slam a religion and its 1.4 billion followers -- almost 25% of the humans on the planet -- in a bigoted fashion. Any time he posted a "fact" to support his ignorant view, the fact was wrong.

I have no qualms belittling him for his every mistake. I will never get along with bigots.

Mule for President.

Oh wait. Sorry.

So you're saying that you're intolerant of those whos politics include tearing down a religion or race . . .type of persons ?

No, I'm saying that I do not get along with bigots. Not trying to be curt, but my statement was pretty precise. :)

But doesn't mean you the are a bigot².

:eek:

that's right! You are guilty of of being a bigot of bigots. Being that you have " no qualms belittling" that type of person.

big·ot n. One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. [French, from Old French.]


. . .and that's how OT works. ;)

Okay seriously;

we need to at LEAST take the Threat of the fight to the enemy.

We are fighting this war, not with just one arm tied behind our back . . .more like we are fighting this war with our pinky-toe.

The word is our ennemy likely has nukes.

read: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45203

plenty critical of Bush for you Bush bashers out there.

Anyone of you take-the-fight-to-whatever-enemy and nuke-'em guys care to elaborate what the British are to do, now that their terrorists have turned out to be British-born suicide bombers?

Ick. Wordplay. That's not how bigotry works. Wikipedia says: bigotry is not "intolerance," but "unreasonable intolerance". For example, some Jews may be intolerant of Nazi Anti-Semitism; that doesn't necessarily make them anti-Nazi bigots.

And calling me a bigot of bigots is wrong in other ways. I tolerate his expressing his bigoted opinions. If I had the power (god help us all) I'd never use law or force to shut him up. I don't want to eradicate him.

Is this fair in OT? Or have I gone OT in OT? :)

looks like I better boil up another pot of coffee...

I've been wasting bytes with my bickering about bigotry, so I feel I should at least respond to something relevant to the thread.

I like the idea of making our enemies our friends. Send TVs to everyone with DirecTV dishes and let them access our sitcoms and Skinemax.

:D well, I'm much more reasonably tolerant of those intolerant bigots . . .such as unreasonable intolerant folks like yourself. :p

antidisestablishmentolerantism?

Skinemax/TV IS a big part of why they hate US.

These people believe that women should be in burkas, and owned. I imagine they think we should just understand /adopt their form of owning multiple wives (if you can afford them) it keeps the poor guy doing your bidding. . .just tell them theyll get their virgins after they've blown-up themselves w/ the said enemy (US).

Eh, well. So they're a hundred years or so behind us. They'll catch up.

http://www.westbournegrammar.com/cos...mages/1600.jpg

Where's the motivation for that?

That's like saying; ah the rich. ..they'll redistribute their wealth, to catch-up with being cool about it all.

Ya know, some people are so worried about being a bigot, that they refuse to see trends, cultures, and practices of others.

Well, unless it's some cliche "bad" group. . . say the KKK? You could likely lump them together as a bad group, eh?

How 'bout drunk drivers?

. . .A culture of "do anything to protect the religion" . . ?

Island..

That kind of "parsing" and word play is beneath you. I am a rather tolerant individual, and I find some of mule's comments to be downright loathsome. Bigoted is too tame a word. Further, should one be tolerant of bigots? What logic tells you that? Should the West been more tolerant of Uncle Aldoph? I sometimes agree with your views, not this time.

I will consider posts by either side worth considering if they are thoughtful, based on logic, and proposed in a coherent and logical manner. Those that propose ethnic cleansing do not fall in the above categories.

oh c'mon "bigot²" . ..thats a bit tongue in cheek.

. .and I do find humor when ever someone says that they are intolerant of intolerance.


ya know, what I've seen here, its okay to bash, say Christians, Catholics .. ..(I may be guilty of that even) but when someone bashes Muslims out come the big ol' "IM OFFENDED for them" . . puh-lease.

If your're going to be the bigot police, you had better be consistant, else some one may be completely right in labeling you one too.;)

Or we will slide back in time, forcing women and girls to have babies against their will including cases of rape and insest.

More pictures.

http://heritage.uen.org/images/main/front3.jpg