Are Conservatives Crazy...? - Page 4

Westy · 03-31-2006, 12:52 PM

This is truly amazing. I visit so seldom anymore, but today I experienced an epiphamy. I think I have gas. Thom is writing posts that I would swear came from the right, Fastpat has a friend, and I actually was able to laugh while reading this thread. One thing concerns me, though. I didn't know you had to have so much education to participate in intellectual conversation. Pat, with all that (supposed) education, why do you spend all day trolling Pelican's BBS?

O0ps, now I'm in for it!!! I'm gonna get mine. I'm in twubble.

PS. be nice to me Pat, I only have one degree, and it's 28 years old.

fastpat · 03-31-2006, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Don Ro
Once one understands the root cause of a particular presentation, the motive becomes clear.A common and pure type.
*Bombast snipped*
Next case.

In other words, you'll say anything to shup me up.

Fat chance.

If you have anything to post here that's germane, please do.

Don Ro · 03-31-2006, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fastpat
In other words, you'll say anything to shup me up.

"Shup" you up? Nah....

Quote:

Originally posted by Don Ro
When you, fastpat, first began your OT posting frenzy - what?, a couple of months ago? - I would read your posts with interest.
Lately I read them for the entertainment value of watching one's pathology embarrass itself.
.
As you were.

rcecale · rcecale's Garage

Quote:

Originally posted by fastpat
If you have anything to post here that's jermaine, please do.

Why would you be interested in a post about Michael's brother?

Randy

Netspeed · 03-31-2006, 02:40 PM

rcecale.....you crack me up!! LOLOLOLO

Rodeo · 03-31-2006, 02:44 PM

You guys are exhibiting a typical "pile on" mentality, which unfortunately is not confined to 14 year old boys. I certainly don't argee with everything Pat posts, but he's a pretty clear thinker, and knows his history.

While this is entertaining in a train wreck sort of way, it would be nice if someone would actually respond to the substance of his posts, instead of attacking his style or his (supposed) mental status.

Netspeed · 03-31-2006, 02:56 PM

Most people here have tried, only to be vilified by him.

rcecale · rcecale's Garage

Quote:

Originally posted by Rodeo
You guys are exhibiting a typical "pile on" mentality, which unfortunately is not confined to 14 year old boys. I certainly don't argee with everything Pat posts, but he's a pretty clear thinker, and knows his history.

While this is entertaining in a train wreck sort of way, it would be nice if someone would actually respond to the substance of his posts, instead of attacking his style or his (supposed) mental status.

Well, now, isn't this a fine example of the pot calling the kettle black? But methinks you forgot something, Rode, ol' buddy. Surely you meant to include a paragraph in which you mention how this is "all Bush's fault."

Randy

Cdnone1 · 03-31-2006, 04:02 PM

Is the plural of germane, germaniums?
Steve

Joeaksa · 03-31-2006, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
INteresting comments about WWII, Germany vs> THe Soviet Union.

Had there not been a two fromt war and Germany were free to deploy whatever necessary on the Eastern Front, victory might have been possible save for the lack of a long-range four engine bomber. The Germans had no way to knock out the production facilities that had been moved eastward out of range of the two engine aircraft that Germany had concentrated on . The USSR was pumping out Stormovek planes and T34 tanks far faster than the Germans could destroy them and, although "inferior", there were so many that the FW 190 or the ME 109 could not stem the tade and were simply out numbered.

Its almost certain that Moscow would have fallen and that would have been a major blow. As it was the Nazi's were on the outskirts of Moscow.

Stalin was ranting and raving for FDR/Eisenhower to open a second front to divert Hitlers production from Russia. Until D-Day in 1944 it was touch and go with the Eastern Front. After 6 June it was only a matter of time, no matter what anyone says.

Joe A

Westy · 03-31-2006, 05:02 PM

Well, since Pat left me alone I'll 'pile on' Rodeo.

Dear Rodeo,,,,,,,HUH? You smokin' that funny stuff? That's as absurd a statement I've read all day.

PS. I know it's Bush's fault. Shhhhhh,,,it's our secret.

rcecale · rcecale's Garage

Westy,

You keep that up and you're bound to be labeled a "neo-con" by the resident bleeding heart! :eek" Or worse yet, a "non-sequitur"

gasp! The horrors!!!!

Randy

Moneyguy1 · 03-31-2006, 05:39 PM

So...Who do you consider the poster with the leaking ventricle?

fastpat · 03-31-2006, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joeaksa
Its almost certain that Moscow would have fallen and that would have been a major blow. As it was the Nazi's were on the outskirts of Moscow.

Stalin was ranting and raving for FDR/Eisenhower to open a second front to divert Hitlers production from Russia. Until D-Day in 1944 it was touch and go with the Eastern Front. After 6 June it was only a matter of time, no matter what anyone says.

Joe A

Since the Germans ran out of steam in the summer of 1943 on the eastern front, and Stalin finally decided to release troops and equipment he'd been withholding from combat, your theory falls a bit short old man.

The US was used solely to enable the complete overrun of Germany by the British, French, and the mercantilists in D.C..

Cdnone1 · 03-31-2006, 09:03 PM

Fastpat
In your meticulous study of world history, has the United States of America ever done anything right?
Steve

Cdnone1 · 03-31-2006, 09:07 PM

Because I mean it wasn't like we just wanted to win the war. I remember fondly listening to my Grandfather talk about how how he fought so the US could be just used by countries like FRANCE ( not that they surrendered, hey here's a though put up a little resistence before your country is over run)
Steve

yellowline · 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cdnone1
Fastpat
In your meticulous study of world history, has the United States of America ever done anything right?
Steve

He's already given away his position. That would be a big no, because we defeated precious Dixie 140 years ago, so everything we've ever done since then has been illegal, illegitimate, unconstitutional, etc.

fastpat · 04-01-2006, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cdnone1
Fastpat
In your meticulous study of world history, has the United States of America ever done anything right?
Steve

Americans have done a great deal right, the US government has done little right since 1815. It has become progressively worse every year, staged a coup d'etat in 1861-1865, and again from 1932-1945.

The US government is not America, but ruling elite in this country hope for and encourage confusion between the two.

fastpat · 04-01-2006, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cdnone1
Because I mean it wasn't like we just wanted to win the war. I remember fondly listening to my Grandfather talk about how how he fought so the US could be just used by countries like FRANCE ( not that they surrendered, hey here's a though put up a little resistence before your country is over run)
Steve

The French aren't my favorite people, largely because I don't care for their history or culture, but they did loose more than 100,000 in combat before surrendering to Germany in 1940.

fintstone · fintstone's Garage

Quote:

Originally posted by fastpat
The French aren't my favorite people, largely because I don't care for their history or culture, but they did loose more than 100,000 in combat before surrendering to Germany in 1940.

Big whoop!...Obviously many more were willing to fight and die for their country...in the other countries that did not surrender immediately...Poland, UK, US, Russia, China, etc

Freedom is not free.