World Peace?

[the]

Originally posted by trekkor
Is that your final answer?


KT

Yeah, but I cheated by looking at the answer sheet.

[legion]

Originally posted by trekkor
Is that your final answer?


KT

Can I use a lifeline, Reg?

[trekkor]

Originally posted by the
Yeah, but I cheated by looking at the answer sheet.

That's pretty funny.


KT

[dd74]

Originally posted by cool_chick
Until some new disease manifests itself. It's necessary to keep the balance.

Unlike for example, the lions/wildebeasts, in this case, the largest "predator" is routinely succumbed by the smallest "predator."

Sage. Very sage. Of course to me, the smallest predators are ego and ignorance.

[dd74]

Originally posted by trekkor

How about actual acomplishments.


KT

Well there is spell check software.

[kach22i]

Originally posted by trekkor
What does this mean to you and what are the obstacles to true peace for all mankind?

Do you believe it will be a reality? Is it possible? When?

Thanks



KT

When women rule the world and Testosterone in one's bloodstream is a controlled substance.

[Tobra]

Originally posted by cool_chick
World peace is unachievable. It's against the nature of the human species.

Write down the date, 4/15/07, CC and I agree.

It is in The Book Trek. There will always be poor, there will always be war, right up until the end.

[legion]

Originally posted by kach22i
When women rule the world and Testosterone in one's bloodstream is a controlled substance.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?threadid=329253

[nostatic]

Originally posted by Tobra
Write down the date, 4/15/07, CC and I agree.

It is in The Book Trek. There will always be poor, there will always be war, right up until the end.

yes, and at the end of the book, the hero saves the day and everyone lives happily ever after...

[trekkor]

correct again...
You're good.


KT

[trekkor]

Am I mistaken in my beleif that mankind in general has no hope for "world peace" in the foreseeable future?

KT

[legion]

You are correct.

We could only achieve world peace if there was only one human left alive, and even then it is not guaranteed.

[svandamme]

or by turning the planet into a nuclear wasteland where only cockroaches live.. that oughta do the trick

theoretical nihilism is brilliant stuff

[trekkor]

That is another common view.

It kinda drives home the point that people believe that mankind are not capable of governing themselves.


KT

[trekkor]

Plus, I think this is a much more interesting topic than evolution.

World conditions are front and center, concern everyone and cannot be ignored.

There is either peace or there is not. No middle ground.


KT

[Moneyguy1]

There is unrest. Unrest can exist without war. Unrest can appear as peace provided violence is not part of that unrest.

To my way of thinking, nothing is either totally one way or another. There is a practically infinite number of situations in between the extremes.

[azasadny]

Visualize whirled peas...

[cashflyer]

No world peace is possible until all societies join into a unified communal democracy.

[legion]

Originally posted by cashflyer
No world peace is possible until all societies join into a unified communal democracy.

Let's hope that never happens.

[Tervuren]

Humans have the ability to make their own choices. Even in a world wide democracy that everyone abided by, how would you have peace? What if everyone voted to kill anyone they didn't like? Depending on your point of view, it could still be world peace even if they where all killing eachother by voting on it!

Sorry, but the word world peace is rubbish to me.